| Revision as of 01:04, 17 November 2015 editMega Z090 (talk | contribs)521 edits Undid revision 690887250 by Crash Underride (talk) removed baiting again - once more and WP:CIVIL will be invoked← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:45, 17 November 2015 edit undoCrash Underride (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers33,037 edits →Guts: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| ::::::It's not that simple, sir. If it were, people would game the system. Can't have that. But I'm not about to call you on it. Just counting. ] ] 09:34, ], ] (UTC) | ::::::It's not that simple, sir. If it were, people would game the system. Can't have that. But I'm not about to call you on it. Just counting. ] ] 09:34, ], ] (UTC) | ||
| ::::::: It is that simple. That's why there is a back up rule called Edit Warring to cover for it. And you and Crash were edit warring as a team. But I'm not about to call you on it. Just watching. ] (]) 03:43, 12 November 2015 (UTC) | ::::::: It is that simple. That's why there is a back up rule called Edit Warring to cover for it. And you and Crash were edit warring as a team. But I'm not about to call you on it. Just watching. ] (]) 03:43, 12 November 2015 (UTC) | ||
| == Guts == | |||
| You have guts. They're misplaced, but you have them. The fact that you've been around less than a year and are threatening people left and right with policies is ballsy. Also, for the last time. I wasn't baiting you. I made a factual point and you're pissy about it so you undid my edit so it would appear it never happened. You didn't get your way so you're tucking your tail between your legs and running like a little kid. ''']]]''' 12:45, 17 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:45, 17 November 2015
Your revert on the NXT Women's Championship talk page
Your edit here was inappropriate. There was no consensus and the discussion was not closed. There is no harm in bringing a relisting to something that had only one !vote at the time. The was only closed after you reverted my relist and then added your !vote to this article. As such you edit has been reverted, the item has been relisted for additional discussion and consensus. Tiggerjay (talk) 17:20, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Mega Z090. Please don't blank comments by other users or whole discussions. If you disagree with what someone has done, say relisting a discussion, talk to them about it on their talk page, don't just remove their comments – that sort of thing will inevitably lead which get us nowhere. Likewise, don't blank full requested move (RM) discussions. If you disagree with the discussion being reopened (fair enough), discuss it with someone – the editor in question, the closing admin, one of the noticeboards, all are more productive than simply blanking. Additionally, old RM discussions are always kept for posterity – if someone else is thinking about moving the article they can see it has already been discussed before and the reasoning that people had. Feel free to ask me if you have any questions about this or the RM process as a whole. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 12:48, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Tisk tisk tisk
You do realize you just violated the 3RR rule right? Crash Underride 06:18, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- Uh Uh I'm on three now. Go to the talk page if you don't want to be reported for edit warring. Mega Z090 (talk) 06:19, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- I was on the talk page already. Crash Underride 06:22, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- The talk page of the article where the issue is, not the other talk page. Mega Z090 (talk) 06:24, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- Now you're at four. InedibleHulk (talk) 00:12, November 11, 2015 (UTC)
- No I'm not. the first of the previous three was more than 24 hours ago. Check. I'm on three now in 24 hours. If I edit again within five hours then I'll be at four. Mega Z090 (talk) 01:47, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- It's not that simple, sir. If it were, people would game the system. Can't have that. But I'm not about to call you on it. Just counting. InedibleHulk (talk) 09:34, November 11, 2015 (UTC)
- It is that simple. That's why there is a back up rule called Edit Warring to cover for it. And you and Crash were edit warring as a team. But I'm not about to call you on it. Just watching. Mega Z090 (talk) 03:43, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- It's not that simple, sir. If it were, people would game the system. Can't have that. But I'm not about to call you on it. Just counting. InedibleHulk (talk) 09:34, November 11, 2015 (UTC)
- No I'm not. the first of the previous three was more than 24 hours ago. Check. I'm on three now in 24 hours. If I edit again within five hours then I'll be at four. Mega Z090 (talk) 01:47, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- Now you're at four. InedibleHulk (talk) 00:12, November 11, 2015 (UTC)
- The talk page of the article where the issue is, not the other talk page. Mega Z090 (talk) 06:24, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- I was on the talk page already. Crash Underride 06:22, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
Guts
You have guts. They're misplaced, but you have them. The fact that you've been around less than a year and are threatening people left and right with policies is ballsy. Also, for the last time. I wasn't baiting you. I made a factual point and you're pissy about it so you undid my edit so it would appear it never happened. You didn't get your way so you're tucking your tail between your legs and running like a little kid. Crash Underride 12:45, 17 November 2015 (UTC)