| Revision as of 09:07, 1 August 2016 editVolunteer Marek (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers94,173 edits →WP:AE: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:12, 1 August 2016 edit undoAnomieBOT (talk | contribs)Bots6,589,454 editsm Substing templates: {{3RR}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info.Next edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| == 1RR == | == 1RR == | ||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| {{3RR|Donald Trump}} | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> | |||
| The article is under a 1RR restriction. You have now made 3 reverts in just a couple of minutes. Please self-revert.] (]) 08:16, 1 August 2016 (UTC) | The article is under a 1RR restriction. You have now made 3 reverts in just a couple of minutes. Please self-revert.] (]) 08:16, 1 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 09:12, 1 August 2016
|
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
1RR
Your recent editing history at Donald Trump shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
The article is under a 1RR restriction. You have now made 3 reverts in just a couple of minutes. Please self-revert.Volunteer Marek (talk) 08:16, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
- Hang on. If I "self-revert", wouldn't that get me in some sort of trouble?! You can't just add blogs as RS's just because you think you know what a RS is. You have no business passing off your edits in the Trump realm as unbiased. It's a joke. Doc talk 08:19, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
- Self-reverts fall under WP:3RRNO, but, I don't think that was the point you were trying to get across. Mr rnddude (talk) 08:48, 1 August 2016 (UTC)