| Revision as of 23:50, 9 September 2006 editBasawala (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers7,900 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:51, 9 September 2006 edit undoBasawala (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers7,900 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| <div style="clear: both"></div>{{{1|] }}}'''You have been temporarily ] from editing for vandalism of Misplaced Pages.''' Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Misplaced Pages are considered ]. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. <!-- Template:Test5 --> - ] 22:23, 9 September 2006 (UTC) | <div style="clear: both"></div>{{{1|] }}}'''You have been temporarily ] from editing for vandalism of Misplaced Pages.''' Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Misplaced Pages are considered ]. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. <!-- Template:Test5 --> - ] 22:23, 9 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| : This user's edits do not seem to count as vandalism under ], they are more like POV bold edits. ] ] 23:50, 9 September 2006 (UTC) | : This user's edits do not seem to count as vandalism under ], they are more like POV bold edits. (But I'm not saying this user should not be block, because of the 3RR)] ] 23:50, 9 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 23:51, 9 September 2006
Thank you for experimenting with Misplaced Pages. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.nids(♂) 21:46, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
You have committed 3RR violation on several articles
Bajrang Dal and Eurabia, in addition to vandalism.
- If you persist, you will be reported and blocked. This is my last official warning.
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.
Hkelkar 21:51, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Do not remove warnings
Please stop. If you continue to remove legitimate warning messages from your talk page, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Khukri 21:53, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
I do not know what your previous warnings were for.
This is your last warning. Removing legitimate warnings from your talk page is considered to be disruption. You will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages and your talk page will be protected from editing if you do it again. Khukri 21:56, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Bajrang Dal
- This article:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1971372.cms
- Does not explicitly accuse BD, but both BD and Lashkar, and it does not mention any modus operandii. So still vandalism I'm afraid.Hkelkar 21:56, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Do not remove warnings or you WILL be blocked from editing further.
This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Eurabia, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Sagaciousuk 22:04, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Misplaced Pages. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Misplaced Pages are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. - Bobet 22:23, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
- This user's edits do not seem to count as vandalism under WP:VAND, they are more like POV bold edits. (But I'm not saying this user should not be block, because of the 3RR)Mar de Sin 23:50, 9 September 2006 (UTC)