| Revision as of 05:37, 12 November 2016 editVujkovica brdo (talk | contribs)374 edits Undid revision 749027821 by David Eppstein Responded and removed warnings← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:29, 14 November 2016 edit undoArthur Rubin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers130,168 edits 3 RNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| In this particular case, the only criterion that might possibly apply is ]. However, the ] article does not qualify for speedy deletion under A7 either, and if you CSD tag it A7, that would be declined as well. CSD A7 only applies to articles that make no credible claim to importance, which is much lower bar than notability or reliability or verifiability of sources. Given the dispute at this article's talk page, the only viable option, if you want this article deleted, is to list it for ], following the instructions given there. 11:07, 12 September 2016 (UTC) | In this particular case, the only criterion that might possibly apply is ]. However, the ] article does not qualify for speedy deletion under A7 either, and if you CSD tag it A7, that would be declined as well. CSD A7 only applies to articles that make no credible claim to importance, which is much lower bar than notability or reliability or verifiability of sources. Given the dispute at this article's talk page, the only viable option, if you want this article deleted, is to list it for ], following the instructions given there. 11:07, 12 September 2016 (UTC) | ||
| :Thank you for your opinion and the instructions.--] (]) 16:56, 12 September 2016 (UTC) | :Thank you for your opinion and the instructions.--] (]) 16:56, 12 September 2016 (UTC) | ||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> — ] ] 08:28, 14 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:29, 14 November 2016
Discuss all encyclopaedia issues on the article's talk page.
Martin Sekulić
Please do not reinsert a speedy deletion tag for this article. Your speedy deletion nomination has already been reviewed and declined. Note that in your nomination you did not specify a valid WP:CDS criterion for deletion. You provided a verbal explanation, whereas a speedy deletion nomination must contain a reference to a specific WP:CSD criterion such as G1, G3, A7, etc. In this particular case, the only criterion that might possibly apply is WP:A7. However, the Martin Sekulić article does not qualify for speedy deletion under A7 either, and if you CSD tag it A7, that would be declined as well. CSD A7 only applies to articles that make no credible claim to importance, which is much lower bar than notability or reliability or verifiability of sources. Given the dispute at this article's talk page, the only viable option, if you want this article deleted, is to list it for WP:AfD, following the instructions given there. 11:07, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you for your opinion and the instructions.--Vujkovica brdo (talk) 16:56, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Stevo Todorčević shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 08:28, 14 November 2016 (UTC)