| Revision as of 18:09, 29 December 2016 editJayPe (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,264 edits →UTRS Account Request: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:09, 7 January 2017 edit undoJayPe (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,264 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''3 months''' for persistently adding ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by first reading the ], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. ] (]) 05:46, 19 December 2016 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-ucblock --> | <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''3 months''' for persistently adding ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by first reading the ], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. ] (]) 05:46, 19 December 2016 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-ucblock --> | ||
| :The reason the length of this block is so long is because you have evidently just ignored previous blocks. You have returned to the same editing pattern that led to those blocks. Please cite sources so we can ]. I will be watching your edits upon your return, if you carry on not providing sources, you may find that the next block is indefinite.--] (]) 05:50, 19 December 2016 (UTC) | :The reason the length of this block is so long is because you have evidently just ignored previous blocks. You have returned to the same editing pattern that led to those blocks. Please cite sources so we can ]. I will be watching your edits upon your return, if you carry on not providing sources, you may find that the next block is indefinite.--] (]) 05:50, 19 December 2016 (UTC) | ||
| I want to continue to contribute to the encyclopedia. I understand that the reason I got blocked was for making edits that did not provide a source. I would also like to apologize to the people that I have made offensive comments too. I easily lose my temper when I get reverted for edits that I have spent countless hours on and get warned for everyday. I understand now that those people did not want to bring me down, but to help make this a reliable site for others to use. I was always going by truth, not by ] when I edit, and while a partial sum of my edits are considered unsourced, they were never intended to disrupt anybody. I feel that I have a lot to offer to the community (most notably to music articles), and all I ask is for another chance to show that I can make useful contributions to this field of work, while doing what is asked of me. I'll also promise to not start any more arguments or edit wars with other users as they have more experience than I do on Misplaced Pages. I know my actions previously would say otherwise, but I hope you reconsider this block because I am willing to change for the better. Thank you. ] (]) 22:21, 19 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == January 2017== | |||
| * I am generally willing to consider unblocking an editor who accepts what he or she has done wrong, and seems to genuinely be willing to change. However, as I see it, there are a couple of problems with your unblock request. | |||
| {{unblock|reason= Hello, my name is JayPe. If you are reading this, I hope you hear what I have to say right now. I was blocked a few weeks ago for habitually adding unsourced content to my edits (mostly hip hop articles), and while you might see from my previous contributions in the past that I was refusing or denying those claims, I must admit that I was doing wrong for not only the community, but to myself. Looking back at the actions I made in order for me to get this block, I sincerely regret what I have done. In the past, I would lash out on other editors when they didn't agree with my edits in place, I should've realized that they have been doing this for several years and have more experience and knowledge than I currently do. If I do get unblocked, I will not continue the content I've been providing for the last couple of months, and follow the rules in place. I know I might've said this before, but I truly mean it as I've taken time off to think about what I have done, and hope to anyone that sees this that you can reconsider this block. I would also like to take a second here to apologize to ], ], ], and any other editors who I've acted upon in the past, I should know better than to lash out on you guys when you have a good reason to come onto my talk page (and that is adding unsourced content which I admit I have done). I have contributed a lot to this encyclopedia, and I want to continue that while complying to the rules in place, and not make a whole argument about it. This might be the last time I make a request for an unblock, so if this doesn't get overturned, I will accept graciously and wait till March to prove my worth, but I hope it doesn't come to that. Thanks. ] (]) 03:09, 7 January 2017 (UTC)}} | |||
| # After previous blocks you apologised and said that you would not do the same things again, as for example and , but then went ahead and did the same things again. Why should we think that this time you will do anything different? | |||
| # In your unblock request you apologise for being uncivil to other editors, and you say that you "promise to not start any more arguments or edit wars with other users". Those are a good step forward, but the reason for the block is persistently adding unsourced content, and you do not give any indication either that you understand that or that you will not do so again. Indeed, if anything you seem to try to downplay that: "a '''partial''' sum of my edits are '''considered''' unsourced" (my emphasis), and moreover you have a history of denying that you have added unsourced content when anyone who looks at your history can see that you have, as for example and . An editor who posts an unblock request which fails to address the reason for the block is unlikely to be unblocked, especially when there is a history of failing or refusing to accept the fact which went on to become the reason for the block. | |||
| * I suggest that you think about those points, and try to address them, if you are to have any chance of being unblocked. <small>''The editor who uses the pseudonym''</small> "]" (]) 13:36, 20 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ==Attempt #2== | |||
| {{unblock reviewed | 1=<span class="template-ping">@]:</span> I would gladly address the concerns you may have. I understand that my reason for my block was for my incompetence to add sources to my edits, not for my insults to other editors (which I am also sorry for). My knowledge of modern hip hop music made me think I was better than , and that I could put whatever I want when I realized now that is not the case. As you can see from my , I have contributed a lot to the music community here at Misplaced Pages, and all I ask is another chance to prove my case. I will no longer disrupt anyone with content that is unsourced, and put only what I can cite. I may have said the same thing to other editors, but being blocked for a few days now made me realize my mistakes that I have made and I sincerely regret it. I know now that there are rules set in place for me and it is my obligation to follow those rules. I do not want to end up like who had followed in same footsteps as I did. I want to continue to make useful contributions to this site, and I would never turn back if you can unblock me. Thanks. ] (]) 14:28, 20 December 2016 (UTC) | decline = Only one unblock request is needed at a time. ]] 18:35, 24 December 2016 (UTC)}} | |||
| :{{ping|JamesBWatson}} Please take a look at this. ] (]) 14:29, 20 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
| : To whoever reviews this unblock request, I also urge you to take a look at JayPe's interactions with other editors in addition to being on their third block for adding unsourced content—including , said remarks after they were removed, telling other editors to , etc. These are all just in the last couple of weeks. This is probably a child or young adult that has a lot to learn about interacting with fellow volunteers and following rules, but I don't know why we're continue to tolerate this behavior. --] ] 18:14, 20 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :{{ping|Laser brain}} I won't lie, you make some valid points Andy. I have acted towards and other editors in the past. I must admit that I haven't been on my best behavior towards others when they have warned for something as vital as sourcing your edits. But you (and anyone else who sees this) must know that I am willing to put all of this behind and become a better perso on Misplaced Pages. I made a few mistakes before because I thought my opinion was more valued than others when that is not true. I broke the rules, and I must admit to it. But just know that even if I do not get my request accepted, I apologize for everything that I have caused. Also this that you mentioned earlier was not intended to bring the message back, more so to bring my talk page back to its to before I made those comments. ] (]) 18:32, 20 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
| {{ping|SQL}} My apologies for that. But I would like to ask you to please look at my previous request and give your input on it (you can look at the second one if you feel that I didn't address certain points from the first one). Thanks ] (]) 19:14, 24 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
| {{UTRS-unblock-user|17213|Dec 29, 2016 16:09:04|closed}}--] (]) 16:09, 29 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == UTRS Account Request == | |||
| I confirm that I have requested an account on the UTRS tool. <!-- Please sign with THREE tildes (~~~), NOT four. This avoids archive bots archiving this message before your account gets approved. --> ] (]) | |||
Revision as of 03:09, 7 January 2017
Proposed deletion of 1017 vs. The World
The article 1017 vs. The World has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- See WP:TOOSOON. No evidence of notability.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:14, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Hibachi for Lunch
Is Hibachi for Lunch a mixtape or an EP?? JustDoItFettyg (talk) 16:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- @JustDoItFettyg: It was first released as a mixtape, and it is considered by many outlets that it was a mixtape so I think it's a mixtape. It was just rereleased as an EP JayPe (talk) 17:24, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of 1017 vs. The World for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1017 vs. The World is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/1017 vs. The World until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:16, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Starboy
If you want the Starboy article to be protected, you had to request for protection at the Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 10:44, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
:)
I really like what you have created bro, keep it up! BDMA Beats (talk) 15:11, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
- @BDMA Beats: Appreciate the love man. JayPe (talk) 16:14, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
6LACK
I was actually gonna undo my edit and say my bad but you made the edit before me. Sorry JustDoItFettyg (talk) 02:06, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
- @JustDoItFettyg: It's fine. BTW, Magnolia just mentioned us both on someone else's talk page, are you planning on responding? JayPe (talk) 2:12, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, after Lazer Brain's responses i will respond back. JustDoItFettyg (talk) 02:33, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
- @JustDoItFettyg: Right there with you on that. JayPe (talk) 2:54, 1 December, 2016 (UTC)
- Yo I was thinking on creating that new J. Cole album "4 Your Eyez Only". Wanna help create the page? JustDoItFettyg (talk) 21:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
- @JustDoItFettyg: I'll gladly help out with the article, but I think we should wait a day or two to do it as it might be taken down for the lack of information it has (see discussion below). JayPe (talk) 21:50, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
- I know that is why i will add information to it. I already made it 4 Your Eyez Only you can help with it too. JustDoItFettyg (talk) 21:56, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
- @JustDoItFettyg: I'll gladly help out with the article, but I think we should wait a day or two to do it as it might be taken down for the lack of information it has (see discussion below). JayPe (talk) 21:50, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
- Yo I was thinking on creating that new J. Cole album "4 Your Eyez Only". Wanna help create the page? JustDoItFettyg (talk) 21:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
- @JustDoItFettyg: Right there with you on that. JayPe (talk) 2:54, 1 December, 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, after Lazer Brain's responses i will respond back. JustDoItFettyg (talk) 02:33, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The Return of East Atlanta Santa
This article should have been created at The Return of East Atlanta Santa, which already existed as a redirect. The article is not currently notable, so I've redirected it. Please wait until there are more sources, then recreate the content at the proper namespace. I think you are aware that an article with a capital O for "of" is not correct. Please do not create alternate namespaces just because the proper redirect you did not create already exists. Ss112 04:35, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Ss112: I had more sources and information piled up, but I'll gladly wait for a better time to put it back up (probably later in the week). Some sources I read also had the capital O in Of for the title so I went with it. JayPe (talk) 4:41, 1 December, 2016 (UTC)
- Fair enough, but please recreate it later in the week at the correct namespace per MOS:CAPS. Ss112 04:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Welcome back
Hey, welcome back. JustDoItFettyg (talk) 00:32, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- @JustDoItFettyg: I realized now that the points I made earlier were uncalled for (and I got pissed off just like this editor), and I should cite my edit's from now on like you said. Feels good to be back. JayPe (talk) 00:41, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- Glad to have you back, just be careful with your edits and cite your sources. :) JustDoItFettyg (talk) 02:28, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Why WP:V is important
Welcome back Jaype. I know you might find it tedious to source edits, but let's have a look at your this edit. Here, I have absolutely no idea which one is correct - your version or the version prior to it. Now consider this scenario. You have put in a lot of hard work to add the content (but neglected to add sources). Another editor comes along and changes the name of the producers. Since none of you have provided any citations, I have no idea whose version to trust. I might as well remove all the unsourced data just so that readers do not get to read factually incorrect information. What does this achieve ultimately though? You put in so much time and effort to add the info - and it is removed because it is unsourced. However, if you had put in citations, I would have been able to quickly verify the content and restore the correct info. What I want you to understand is that WP:V is compulsory. Edits must be sourced. I don't want you to be blocked because you are a productive editor and do great content work otherwise. Why don't you just put in sources? --Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:16, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Lemongirl942: I was in a rush when I made this edit here, so my bad for that. I found all of my information from here, and I will add the missing information at a later time. Since you are here though, I want to apologize for telling you to "get a life" a couple weeks back. You have been very kind to me since I've came back and I feel bad for what I said earlier. I will continue to cite my sources in my edits from now on. JayPe (talk) 3:29, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
ANI
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:02, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
December 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Misplaced Pages, as you did at GTTM: Goin Thru the Motions. Magnolia677 (talk) 01:27, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 5 albert square (talk) 05:46, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
- The reason the length of this block is so long is because you have evidently just ignored previous blocks. You have returned to the same editing pattern that led to those blocks. Please cite sources so we can verify your edits. I will be watching your edits upon your return, if you carry on not providing sources, you may find that the next block is indefinite.--5 albert square (talk) 05:50, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
January 2017
JayPe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello, my name is JayPe. If you are reading this, I hope you hear what I have to say right now. I was blocked a few weeks ago for habitually adding unsourced content to my edits (mostly hip hop articles), and while you might see from my previous contributions in the past that I was refusing or denying those claims, I must admit that I was doing wrong for not only the community, but to myself. Looking back at the actions I made in order for me to get this block, I sincerely regret what I have done. In the past, I would lash out on other editors when they didn't agree with my edits in place, I should've realized that they have been doing this for several years and have more experience and knowledge than I currently do. If I do get unblocked, I will not continue the content I've been providing for the last couple of months, and follow the rules in place. I know I might've said this before, but I truly mean it as I've taken time off to think about what I have done, and hope to anyone that sees this that you can reconsider this block. I would also like to take a second here to apologize to Magnolia677, Lemongirl942, Laser brain, and any other editors who I've acted upon in the past, I should know better than to lash out on you guys when you have a good reason to come onto my talk page (and that is adding unsourced content which I admit I have done). I have contributed a lot to this encyclopedia, and I want to continue that while complying to the rules in place, and not make a whole argument about it. This might be the last time I make a request for an unblock, so if this doesn't get overturned, I will accept graciously and wait till March to prove my worth, but I hope it doesn't come to that. Thanks. JayPe (talk) 03:09, 7 January 2017 (UTC)Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Hello, my name is JayPe. If you are reading this, I hope you hear what I have to say right now. I was blocked a few weeks ago for habitually adding unsourced content to my edits (mostly hip hop articles), and while you might see from my previous contributions in the past that I was refusing or denying those claims, I must admit that I was doing wrong for not only the community, but to myself. Looking back at the actions I made in order for me to get this block, I sincerely regret what I have done. In the past, I would lash out on other editors when they didn't agree with my edits in place, I should've realized that they have been doing this for several years and have more experience and knowledge than I currently do. If I do get unblocked, I will not continue the content I've been providing for the last couple of months, and follow the rules in place. I know I might've said this before, but I truly mean it as I've taken time off to think about what I have done, and hope to anyone that sees this that you can reconsider this block. I would also like to take a second here to apologize to ], ], ], and any other editors who I've acted upon in the past, I should know better than to lash out on you guys when you have a good reason to come onto my talk page (and that is adding unsourced content which I admit I have done). I have contributed a lot to this encyclopedia, and I want to continue that while complying to the rules in place, and not make a whole argument about it. This might be the last time I make a request for an unblock, so if this doesn't get overturned, I will accept graciously and wait till March to prove my worth, but I hope it doesn't come to that. Thanks. ] (]) 03:09, 7 January 2017 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello, my name is JayPe. If you are reading this, I hope you hear what I have to say right now. I was blocked a few weeks ago for habitually adding unsourced content to my edits (mostly hip hop articles), and while you might see from my previous contributions in the past that I was refusing or denying those claims, I must admit that I was doing wrong for not only the community, but to myself. Looking back at the actions I made in order for me to get this block, I sincerely regret what I have done. In the past, I would lash out on other editors when they didn't agree with my edits in place, I should've realized that they have been doing this for several years and have more experience and knowledge than I currently do. If I do get unblocked, I will not continue the content I've been providing for the last couple of months, and follow the rules in place. I know I might've said this before, but I truly mean it as I've taken time off to think about what I have done, and hope to anyone that sees this that you can reconsider this block. I would also like to take a second here to apologize to ], ], ], and any other editors who I've acted upon in the past, I should know better than to lash out on you guys when you have a good reason to come onto my talk page (and that is adding unsourced content which I admit I have done). I have contributed a lot to this encyclopedia, and I want to continue that while complying to the rules in place, and not make a whole argument about it. This might be the last time I make a request for an unblock, so if this doesn't get overturned, I will accept graciously and wait till March to prove my worth, but I hope it doesn't come to that. Thanks. ] (]) 03:09, 7 January 2017 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello, my name is JayPe. If you are reading this, I hope you hear what I have to say right now. I was blocked a few weeks ago for habitually adding unsourced content to my edits (mostly hip hop articles), and while you might see from my previous contributions in the past that I was refusing or denying those claims, I must admit that I was doing wrong for not only the community, but to myself. Looking back at the actions I made in order for me to get this block, I sincerely regret what I have done. In the past, I would lash out on other editors when they didn't agree with my edits in place, I should've realized that they have been doing this for several years and have more experience and knowledge than I currently do. If I do get unblocked, I will not continue the content I've been providing for the last couple of months, and follow the rules in place. I know I might've said this before, but I truly mean it as I've taken time off to think about what I have done, and hope to anyone that sees this that you can reconsider this block. I would also like to take a second here to apologize to ], ], ], and any other editors who I've acted upon in the past, I should know better than to lash out on you guys when you have a good reason to come onto my talk page (and that is adding unsourced content which I admit I have done). I have contributed a lot to this encyclopedia, and I want to continue that while complying to the rules in place, and not make a whole argument about it. This might be the last time I make a request for an unblock, so if this doesn't get overturned, I will accept graciously and wait till March to prove my worth, but I hope it doesn't come to that. Thanks. ] (]) 03:09, 7 January 2017 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}