Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
* is a clear BLP violation. It was a good revert, but inexplicably marked it as a "good faith" edit.
* is a clear BLP violation. It was a good revert, but inexplicably marked it as a "good faith" edit.
As I said, I only checked a few reverts and they were all bad. I would strongly suggest reading ] and familiarizing yourself with our other ] before continuing to use Twinkle. If you have any questions, please ask. Cheers! ] (]) 16:36, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
As I said, I only checked a few reverts and they were all bad. I would strongly suggest reading ] and familiarizing yourself with our other ] before continuing to use Twinkle. If you have any questions, please ask. Cheers! ] (]) 16:36, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
:+1, Marlo Jonesa is not ready for Twinkle. ] (]) 16:39, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Revision as of 16:39, 15 January 2017
This is Marlo Jonesa'stalk page, where you can send messages and comments to Marlo Jonesa.
I'm not sure you should be using Twinkle until you have a better understanding of our policies and guidelines. I just spot-checked three of your reverts and all of them were wrong in some way:
This edit was a clear good-faith improvement to the text, adding a paragraph break where appropriate, and removing both a duplicate paragraph and extraneous line break. You reverted the edit and gave the editor a second-level warning for their very first good faith edit.
This series of edits included removing unsourced text (which the editor noted as "added without citations") and an extra space. You reverted the entire series rather than the single, questionable edit to the image size.
This edit is a clear BLP violation. It was a good revert, but your revert inexplicably marked it as a "good faith" edit.
