| Revision as of 16:39, 15 January 2017 editGrandma Gatewood (talk | contribs)9 edits →Twinkle← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:50, 15 January 2017 edit undoWoodroar (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers18,998 edits →Twinkle: just saw this as wellNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| As I said, I only checked a few reverts and they were all bad. I would strongly suggest reading ] and familiarizing yourself with our other ] before continuing to use Twinkle. If you have any questions, please ask. Cheers! ] (]) 16:36, 15 January 2017 (UTC) | As I said, I only checked a few reverts and they were all bad. I would strongly suggest reading ] and familiarizing yourself with our other ] before continuing to use Twinkle. If you have any questions, please ask. Cheers! ] (]) 16:36, 15 January 2017 (UTC) | ||
| :+1, Marlo Jonesa is not ready for Twinkle. ] (]) 16:39, 15 January 2017 (UTC) | :+1, Marlo Jonesa is not ready for Twinkle. ] (]) 16:39, 15 January 2017 (UTC) | ||
| :In addition, was essentially a rewrite of the article. Sources were added, and plenty of red links and unsourced content was removed. These are clearly good faith edits. and and later . They were not in any way vandalism. ] (]) 16:49, 15 January 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:50, 15 January 2017
| This is Marlo Jonesa'stalk page, where you can send messages and comments to Marlo Jonesa. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
 | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Marlo Jonesa. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this page. You may wish to ask factual questions about Marlo Jonesa at the Reference desk. |
| This page is not a forum for general discussion about Marlo Jonesa. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this page. You may wish to ask factual questions about Marlo Jonesa at the Reference desk. |
| Skip to table of contents |
Twinkle
I'm not sure you should be using Twinkle until you have a better understanding of our policies and guidelines. I just spot-checked three of your reverts and all of them were wrong in some way:
- This edit was a clear good-faith improvement to the text, adding a paragraph break where appropriate, and removing both a duplicate paragraph and extraneous line break. You reverted the edit and gave the editor a second-level warning for their very first good faith edit.
- This series of edits included removing unsourced text (which the editor noted as "added without citations") and an extra space. You reverted the entire series rather than the single, questionable edit to the image size.
- This edit is a clear BLP violation. It was a good revert, but your revert inexplicably marked it as a "good faith" edit.
As I said, I only checked a few reverts and they were all bad. I would strongly suggest reading Misplaced Pages:Vandalism and familiarizing yourself with our other policies and guidelines before continuing to use Twinkle. If you have any questions, please ask. Cheers! Woodroar (talk) 16:36, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
- +1, Marlo Jonesa is not ready for Twinkle. Grandma Gatewood (talk) 16:39, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
- In addition, this series of edits was essentially a rewrite of the article. Sources were added, and plenty of red links and unsourced content was removed. These are clearly good faith edits. You reverted and warned the editor twice and later called the edits "vandalism". They were not in any way vandalism. Woodroar (talk) 16:49, 15 January 2017 (UTC)