Misplaced Pages

Talk:Thor (film): Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:28, 14 May 2017 editTenebrae (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users155,424 edits edit-warring anon IP← Previous edit Revision as of 00:49, 13 December 2017 edit undo137.147.12.221 (talk) →DismabiguationNext edit →
Line 59: Line 59:
:: is a source, though it doesn't mention it as the Tesseract. Will see if I can find one that mentions it as such. Also, I would be in agreement, with using a note, as on the CA:TFA article. Also, tread lightly if you Google "Tesseract thor ending", as that has stuff about the DARK WORLD endings. - ] (]) 22:16, 4 November 2013 (UTC) :: is a source, though it doesn't mention it as the Tesseract. Will see if I can find one that mentions it as such. Also, I would be in agreement, with using a note, as on the CA:TFA article. Also, tread lightly if you Google "Tesseract thor ending", as that has stuff about the DARK WORLD endings. - ] (]) 22:16, 4 November 2013 (UTC)


== Dismabiguation == == Disambiguation ==


There have been two attempts to add a disambiguation header for ] to this article, referring to a 24 year old satellite that was renamed Thor 1 21 years ago and was scuttered 11 years ago. The article for that series of satellites is already disambiguated, the redirect Thor 1 has 18 views in the last 30 days. The satellite article as a whole has 1000 views in the last thirty days and the film article has 193,927 views in the last thirty days. Not only is it a redirect that few, to barely any, people are using, but they're clearly not using it to find the satellite. ] ] / Comment on '']'s FA nom! 22:28, 2 March 2014 (UTC) There have been two attempts to add a disambiguation header for ] to this article, referring to a 24 year old satellite that was renamed Thor 1 21 years ago and was scuttered 11 years ago. The article for that series of satellites is already disambiguated, the redirect Thor 1 has 18 views in the last 30 days. The satellite article as a whole has 1000 views in the last thirty days and the film article has 193,927 views in the last thirty days. Not only is it a redirect that few, to barely any, people are using, but they're clearly not using it to find the satellite. ] ] / Comment on '']'s FA nom! 22:28, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:49, 13 December 2017

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Thor (film) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 2 months 

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Thor (film) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 2 months 
Good articleThor (film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starThor (film) is part of the Marvel Cinematic Universe films series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Misplaced Pages community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 27, 2011Good article nomineeListed
April 5, 2015Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You KnowA fact from this article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 27, 2010.The text of the entry was: Did you know
  • ... that Thor, scheduled for release in 2011, was envisioned and pitched to 20th Century Fox as early as 1990?
Current status: Good article
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconFilm: Comic book / American
WikiProject icon
  • Film portal
    • This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
    Taskforce icon
    		This article is supported by the Comic book films task force.
    Taskforce icon
    		This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
    Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
    WikiProject iconComics: Marvel / Films Low‑importance
    WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Misplaced Pages. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics
    LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
    Related work groups:
    / 
    Taskforce icon
    		This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.
    Taskforce icon
    		This article is supported by Comic book films work group.

    Cosmic Cube

    Not linking to the Captain America movie in accordance to wiki:EGG is kind of understandable. But prohibiting linking to the Cosmic Cube#Film is not. When someone clicks a link labeled 'mysterious object' they don't expect to be taken to a page explaining the plot device of 'mysterious objects' and their history over the past few thousand years. They expect to be taken to a page about what that object is. MatrixM (talk) 21:31, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

    First sorry, I didn't see that you had already started a discussion. At any rate its best to determine consensus here before boldly changing the article. But back to the topic, the object is never identified within the plot of this film. So without referencing an outside source it is WP:OR, nevermind WP:EGG. I would not be opposed to adding a note, like the one in the CA:TFA article if we have a reference, which I am sure we could find.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:42, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
    Here is a source, though it doesn't mention it as the Tesseract. Will see if I can find one that mentions it as such. Also, I would be in agreement, with using a note, as on the CA:TFA article. Also, tread lightly if you Google "Tesseract thor ending", as that has stuff about the DARK WORLD endings. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 22:16, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

    Disambiguation

    There have been two attempts to add a disambiguation header for Thor 1 to this article, referring to a 24 year old satellite that was renamed Thor 1 21 years ago and was scuttered 11 years ago. The article for that series of satellites is already disambiguated, the redirect Thor 1 has 18 views in the last 30 days. The satellite article as a whole has 1000 views in the last thirty days and the film article has 193,927 views in the last thirty days. Not only is it a redirect that few, to barely any, people are using, but they're clearly not using it to find the satellite. DWB (talk) / Comment on Dishonored's FA nom! 22:28, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

    Thor 1 is now a disambiguation page. Disambiguation helps readers find the article they are looking for, regardless of the popularity of particular pages. Cnilep (talk) 06:03, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
    I think it was just the fact that, wrongly or not, Thor 1 was redirected here, but a hatnote should not have been needed here because the page is already disambiguated sufficiently. It appears the error was in redirecting Thor 1 here, which it seems you fixed Cnilep. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 06:26, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
    This page was not already disambiguated sufficiently from "Thor 1" when "Thor 1" redirected here. That is had a qualifier to disambiguate it from "Thor" made no difference; it was the primary topic for the ambiguous title "Thor 1". If a reader were looking for the satellite under "Thor 1", they would have had no path to get to the article they sought. It does not matter how few those readers are. Now that this article is no longer the primary topic for the ambiguous title "Thor 1", the hatnote is no longer needed, true. -- JHunterJ (talk) 14:54, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
    Agree, "Thor 1" should never have been redirected here in the first place. It doesn't likely that a person search searching for this film would actually type "Thor 1", unlike Thor 2, which Thor: The Dark World was actually called for a period of time and is still called colloquially.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 15:22, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
    Was the alternative plan to add a hatnote to every Thor sequel to disambiguate them from satellites? Yes the visitation frequency of the redirect does matter, because noone was using it, so it wasn't a problem that needed solving. DWB (talk) / Comment on Dishonored's FA nom! 18:25, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
    The plan (no alternative) remains to disambiguate ambiguous titles on Misplaced Pages, through hatnotes and disambiguation pages. No, the visitation frequency does not matter. Topics on Misplaced Pages for ambiguous titles that do not merit navigability are called "deleted articles". -- JHunterJ (talk) 22:05, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

    Does anybody think this is an ensemble cast?

    It has Chris Hemsworth, Natalie Portman, Anthony Hopkins, Idris Elba, Tom Hiddleston, Stellan Skarsgård, and Kat Dennings in it. Eurocus47 (talk) 00:21, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

    External links modified

    Hello fellow Wikipedians,

    I have just modified 136 external links on Thor (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

    When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

    This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

    • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
    • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

    Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:59, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

    Edit warring anon IP

    Three editors have now reverted today's edit-warring anon IP. I have left a message at his talk page regarding his three reverts, one more of which will result in 3RR vio. --Tenebrae (talk) 17:27, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

    Categories:
    Talk:Thor (film): Difference between revisions Add topic