| Revision as of 18:37, 27 September 2006 view sourceMorton devonshire (talk | contribs)6,576 edits →Further to my previous comments: the Arbcom was rightfully denied← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:53, 27 September 2006 view source Shortfuse (talk | contribs)326 editsm →Further to my previous comments: - Arbcom not denied... yet.Next edit → | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
| And you cannot refuse to take part in an Arbcom case. You need to tsake it seriously.--] 11:51, 27 September 2006 (UTC) | And you cannot refuse to take part in an Arbcom case. You need to tsake it seriously.--] 11:51, 27 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :Thank you for your comment, but your a little late to the ballgame. I've made my peace with Tyrenius, and have made the changes to my user and subpages that were requested. Moreover, the Arbcom was denied. ] 18:37, 27 September 2006 (UTC) | :Thank you for your comment, but your a little late to the ballgame. I've made my peace with Tyrenius, and have made the changes to my user and subpages that were requested. Moreover, the Arbcom was denied. ] 18:37, 27 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ::You don’t appear to have understood the ArbCom rules very well. I would suggest that you re-read them again, because you're not out of the woods yet. It takes FOUR arbitrators to deny or accept the case, and if it gets four accept votes, it will be accepted regardless of who or how many voted deny previous to that. Granted, that’s unlikely now because I have seen that in most cases when the first one votes to not accept, the rest generally follow suit. | |||
| ::Finally, you need to stop archiving your talk page when there are still open issues on it. Its uncivil and will reflect poorly on you if you continue to do so. --] 18:53, 27 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:53, 27 September 2006
| Please leave a new message. |
| File:Mao-tiananmen-portrait.jpg | This user is a member of the Counter-Propaganda Unit |
Discussion Conventions
- Please post new messages at the bottom of the page to prevent confusion.
- Please sign your comments. Type
~~~~after your text or use the edit toolbar. - Please use section headings to separate conversation topics.
- Caveat: Please keep in mind that I don't necessarily agree with the thoughts expressed by others on this page.
 Archives |
|---|
Further to my previous comments
I see that you have archived my previous message and have not acted on any of it. This is not in your own best interests. I am quite impartial as to the content dispute, and am solely interested in maintaining Misplaced Pages. You cannot be seen as a credible participant in the content dispute while you have this page in its present form. It would be a good idea to withdraw your remark here.
And you cannot refuse to take part in an Arbcom case. You need to tsake it seriously.--Runcorn 11:51, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comment, but your a little late to the ballgame. I've made my peace with Tyrenius, and have made the changes to my user and subpages that were requested. Moreover, the Arbcom was denied. Morton devonshire 18:37, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- You don’t appear to have understood the ArbCom rules very well. I would suggest that you re-read them again, because you're not out of the woods yet. It takes FOUR arbitrators to deny or accept the case, and if it gets four accept votes, it will be accepted regardless of who or how many voted deny previous to that. Granted, that’s unlikely now because I have seen that in most cases when the first one votes to not accept, the rest generally follow suit.
- Finally, you need to stop archiving your talk page when there are still open issues on it. Its uncivil and will reflect poorly on you if you continue to do so. --Shortfuse 18:53, 27 September 2006 (UTC)