Misplaced Pages

User talk:Ihardlythinkso: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:52, 4 January 2018 editIhardlythinkso (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers75,486 edits Undid revision 818567711 by SMcCandlish (talk) fuck off← Previous edit Revision as of 08:59, 4 January 2018 edit undoIhardlythinkso (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers75,486 edits Undid revision 818562793 by SMcCandlish (talk)Next edit →
Line 72: Line 72:
I remember you wished me ] way back in 2013; popping back in five years later to wish you the same, and my talk page is always open should you want to collaborate on any more chess variant articles. ^_^ ] (]) 14:59, 31 December 2017 (UTC) I remember you wished me ] way back in 2013; popping back in five years later to wish you the same, and my talk page is always open should you want to collaborate on any more chess variant articles. ^_^ ] (]) 14:59, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
:Thx, & ditto. ;) --] (]) 15:11, 31 December 2017 (UTC) :Thx, & ditto. ;) --] (]) 15:11, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

== ] notice ==

{{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.''

'''Please carefully read this information:'''

The ] has authorised ] to be used for pages regarding the English Misplaced Pages ] and ], a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is ].

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert -->
This is in reference to this pair of edits , , which instead of becoming more moderated and thoughtful, turned even more strident, accusatory, and ]-casting about my motives. Most of if makes no sense at all; as I've already explained , these strange and baseless hypotheses about me are quite literally not even possible.

PS: You might want to review your Malleus Fatuorum quote at the top of your talk page. The few times I can recall you flying off the handle in this manner, it's always over style nit-picks. <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family:'Trebuchet MS'"> — ] ] ] &gt;<sup>ʌ</sup>ⱷ҅<sub>ᴥ</sub>ⱷ<sup>ʌ</sup>&lt; </span> 07:35, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:59, 4 January 2018


    This user has joined the Eric Corbett initiative to boycott editing articles on Mondays until things change. (You can join too!)
    But Monday morning,
    Monday morning couldn't guarantee
    That Monday evening,
    You would still be here with me
    "Monday, Monday", The Mamas & the Papas, 1966



    “ I was thinking yesterday, in all my life, I have never been so harassed, wantonly smeared, blatantly lied about or otherwise trashed as I've been on this website. Not even nearly. ”
    — Gwen Gale (talk) 00:58, 23 December 2011 (UTC)


    “ The way to avoid 'incivility' is to avoid the triggers for it. ”
    —  Malleus Fatuorum 13:57, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
    • "I'll also emplore my fellow editors not to engage in behavior that can be viewed as taunting or otherwise encouraging the continuation of this editor's behavior along these lines. Toddst1 (talk) 19:08, 25 January 2012 (UTC)"
    • "I think it's best if you leave them alone, as difficult as that may be. That's what I've done, pretty much--I just stay out of their way. Drmies (talk) 19:01, 11 March 2014 (UTC)"
      Thank you, Toddst1 and Drmies. (One of the most considerate things admins have ever done for me!) Sincere, Ihardlythinkso (talk) 20:38, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
    "Fellow workers of INTJs often feel as if the INTJ can see right through them, and often believe that the INTJ finds them wanting. This tendency of people to feel transparent in the presence of the INTJ often results in relationships which have psychological distance. Thus colleagues find the INTJ apparently unemotional and, at times, cold and dispassionate. Because of their tendency to drive others as hard as they do themselves, INTJs often seem demanding and difficult to satisfy. INTJs are high achievers in school and on the job. On the job, they take the goals of an institution seriously and continually strive to respond to these goals. They make dedicated, loyal employees whose loyalties are directed toward the system, rather than toward individuals within the system."
    Keirsey, David; Bates, Marilyn (1984). Please Understand Me: Character & Temperament Types (Fifth ed.). Prometheus Nemesis Book Company. p. 182. ISBN 0-9606954-0-0.
    Userboxes
    vn-13This user talk page has been vandalized 13 times.
    This user tries to do the right thing. If he makes a mistake, please let him know.
    This user does not understand mean people. Please be nice.
    Donald TrumpThis user supports the presidency of Donald Trump.
    INTJThis user has an INTJ
    Myers–Briggs Type Indicator
    This user has nibbled
    The Donut of DOOM
    FREE PENYULAP


    Restore comment

    "Any dirtball can file at ANI against any editor for any reason. Any dirtball can file at Arbcom against any editor for any reason. Any dirtball admin (and it's not like they don't exist) can block any reg editor (interesting they don't block other admins, or have I missed that?) for any superficial or plain made-up reason. So all the inuendos, if they are present in even the slightest degree, "if this comes to ANI/Arbcom/block again, boy-oh-boy Joe, you better see to it that it doesn't happen, 'cause that'll be the last straw, we have limited patience to see this go by our eyes anymore, don't say you haven't been warned", is really ... (I'll quit now, do I really have to describe what's wrong?). --IHTS (talk) 18:23, 4 November 2017 (UTC)" --IHTS (talk) 05:05, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

    New Page Reviewing

    Hello, Ihardlythinkso.

    I've seen you editing recently and you seem knowledgeable about Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines.
    Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines; currently Misplaced Pages needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere 09:05, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

    Nice work on McDonnell Gambit

    Cheers, --joe decker 00:48, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

    Thx! ;) --IHTS (talk) 00:57, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

    Happy New Year!

    I remember you wished me a happy (if belated) new year way back in 2013; popping back in five years later to wish you the same, and my talk page is always open should you want to collaborate on any more chess variant articles. ^_^ Double sharp (talk) 14:59, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

    Thx, & ditto. ;) --IHTS (talk) 15:11, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
    Category:
    User talk:Ihardlythinkso: Difference between revisions Add topic