Talk:Mike Murdock: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 13:34, 30 January 2018 editInternetArchiveBot (talk \| contribs)Bots, Pending changes reviewers5,388,307 edits Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.6.2)← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:42, 4 July 2019 edit undoBkatcher (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users27,989 editsm →Prosperity Preacher Bashers Next edit →
Line 30:		Line 30:
	It is not fair to take out the history of Murdock's ministry and replace it with criticism of his preaching style. I replaced his history...and took out much of the negative criticism. <span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 17:03, 12 September 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->		It is not fair to take out the history of Murdock's ministry and replace it with criticism of his preaching style. I replaced his history...and took out much of the negative criticism. <span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 17:03, 12 September 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

	It's also not fair to remove legitimate critisism and replace it with a glowing report from his PR agent. ] (]) 17:07, 12 September 2008 (UTC)		It's also not fair to remove legitimate critisism and replace it with a glowing report from his PR agent. ] (]) 17:07, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

	If there is so much controversy and criticism surrounding this person, why is it unfair to include at least a reference to it here? It's a fact that a great many people have difficulty rationalizing or understanding the true motivation of this person. Fact is not slander. I feel strongly that a reference needs to be made of the overwhelming negative perception surrounding this person. To leave that out is denying a truth and a fact.] (]) 23:14, 14 February 2010 (UTC)		If there is so much controversy and criticism surrounding this person, why is it unfair to include at least a reference to it here? It's a fact that a great many people have difficulty rationalizing or understanding the true motivation of this person. Fact is not slander. I feel strongly that a reference needs to be made of the overwhelming negative perception surrounding this person. To leave that out is denying a truth and a fact.] (]) 23:14, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:42, 4 July 2019

Biography Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

United States: Texas Start‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

This article was nominated for deletion on April 7, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. An archived record of this discussion can be found here.

cleanup

If this survives afd it needs a cleanup for tone so it reads more like an encyclopedia article and is more WP:NPOV. Also links section needs to be wikified and redundencies removed.--Isotope23 05:11, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Daredevil alias

This name was once used as an alias by the comics character Daredevil (Marvel Comics). A disambiguation page may be neccesary.-Toptomcat 15:01, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Mike-Murdock.jpg

Image:Mike-Murdock.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Misplaced Pages article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Prosperity Preacher Bashers

It is not fair to take out the history of Murdock's ministry and replace it with criticism of his preaching style. I replaced his history...and took out much of the negative criticism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.142.49.18 (talk) 17:03, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

It's also not fair to remove legitimate critisism and replace it with a glowing report from his PR agent. Bkatcher (talk) 17:07, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

If there is so much controversy and criticism surrounding this person, why is it unfair to include at least a reference to it here? It's a fact that a great many people have difficulty rationalizing or understanding the true motivation of this person. Fact is not slander. I feel strongly that a reference needs to be made of the overwhelming negative perception surrounding this person. To leave that out is denying a truth and a fact.67.167.110.28 (talk) 23:14, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Negative perception? Perhaps it comes from Mike stooping lower than any mud-swimming evangelist. He'll offer angel protection for your son or daughter in Iraq for a seed donation. This guy is the money man. He'll extract it from the seriously desperate and dumb. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.106.87.15 (talk) 18:06, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Sow your seed of only $1000 and God will dissmiss your bankruptcy. Don't hold onto that seed. It must be sown. God needs your money to answer your prayers. God is running a grift and using Murdock as his puppet.71.218.234.188 (talk) 16:49, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

And there's also THIS. http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/02/28/shady-trump-supporting-pastor-gave-a-sex-scandal-plagued-nigerian-pastor-cash-and-a-rolls-royce.html

Of course, I knew exactly what kind of man he is the moment I saw him on tv - you have to be a real idiot (which many religious people seem to be) to fall for such a blatant scammer!

97.107.47.142 (talk) 08:32, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

No information about his life

The article lacks Mike Murdock's life history. (example: Is he married? Does he have any children?)

Also we are lacking his book history and music history.

That information has been added now. Apajj89 (talk) 20:36, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Cleanup

Article has several issues with bias / POV. A complaint was made to BLPN. I am cleaning up as best I can. A few notes:

Thieves (book) is an unlikely (and improper) source for a portion of Thieves (book) being published as an article.
The affair(s) must be prefaced by "alleged."
I removed some things that did not make sense as written

--Nouniquenames (talk) 03:40, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Bias and opinion sources

I would like to see this page brought back up to the standards of Misplaced Pages. A lot of the sources on this page are hit blogs or opinion pieces taken from the trinity foundation. I feel the article is in great need of a cleanup Pjlancer (talk) 04:28, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mike Murdock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:34, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Categories: