Revision as of 12:23, 7 July 2018 editBbb23 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators271,626 edits →07 July 2018: cu results, close← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:31, 7 July 2018 edit undoIvanvector (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Administrators52,362 edits →07 July 2018: reNext edit → | ||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
*{{decline}}: most recent confirmed socks are stale. Will take a look at behaviour. ] (<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub>) 12:17, 7 July 2018 (UTC) | *{{decline}}: most recent confirmed socks are stale. Will take a look at behaviour. ] (<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub>) 12:17, 7 July 2018 (UTC) | ||
:*{{re|Ivanvector}} I was already checking when you declined. 2Joules is very {{likely}} to {{user2|Elektricity}}. {{bnt}}. Closing.--] (]) 12:23, 7 July 2018 (UTC) | :*{{re|Ivanvector}} I was already checking when you declined. 2Joules is very {{likely}} to {{user2|Elektricity}}. {{bnt}}. Closing.--] (]) 12:23, 7 July 2018 (UTC) | ||
:::{{re|Bbb23}} thanks, I was just about to come back here to say there were possible behavioural connections along with some differences in technical data that I have access to, and was going to call inconclusive without checkuser. So thanks for filling in that gap. ] (<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub>) 12:31, 7 July 2018 (UTC) | |||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> | ----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
Revision as of 12:31, 7 July 2018
FreeatlastChitchat
FreeatlastChitchat (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/FreeatlastChitchat/Archive.
07 July 2018
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
Suspected sockpuppets
- 2Joules (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
With this edit, the editor has completely revealed his feuds and friendships with the editors in question and his status of relationship with each of these editors is same as that of FreeatlastChitchat. Claims that "only editor who have accepted thier T-ban and continued editing for[REDACTED] in good faith is SheriffIsInTown", obviously because SheriffIsInTown was the only editor to support FreeatlastChitchat after he was topic banned.
Previous sock was blocked on 6 March, and this account was created on 7 March.
For such a new user, he has been sharing every trait with FreeatlastChitchat from occasionally reporting users to WP:COIN, WP:UAA, WP:AIV.
On Aafia Siddiqui, both accounts have made mention of "Al-Qaeda" on the MOS:BEGINNING (first sentence of the article), while making a new paragraph that the person "was born in Pakistan" on lead, and later on both would edit war to restore the mention of "Al-Qaeda" on lead.
His pattern of commenting on others reports on WP:ARE is same:-
Tries to maintain that he avoids India-Pakistan conflict while deeply engaging himself in the subject:-
- "My statement is as follows. I have no interaction . The Indo-Pak conflict spilling over onto[REDACTED] makes sense".
Has no understanding of WP:COPYVIO:-
- "Please provide a link to any comparison tool like copyscape, that shows that this is a copyright violation"
- "Which parts are copy vio? Point out ont he talk page. I do not see any copy vio issues"
More of same writing style, and using same sentences:
On ARE, he wants "short fortnightly ban for Adamgerber80 should be placed" given the previous sock (Elektricity) had feuds with Adamgerber80.
@NeilN: who participated in the previous SPI. Lorstaking (talk) 11:25, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Clerk declined: most recent confirmed socks are stale. Will take a look at behaviour. Ivanvector (/Edits) 12:17, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Ivanvector: I was already checking when you declined. 2Joules is very Likely to Elektricity (talk · contribs · count). Blocked and tagged. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:23, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Bbb23: thanks, I was just about to come back here to say there were possible behavioural connections along with some differences in technical data that I have access to, and was going to call inconclusive without checkuser. So thanks for filling in that gap. Ivanvector (/Edits) 12:31, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Categories: