| Revision as of 02:29, 3 December 2018 editMichael in oc (talk | contribs)28 edits →December 2018← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:29, 3 December 2018 edit undoMichael in oc (talk | contribs)28 edits →December 2018Next edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| ==December 2018== | ==December 2018== | ||
| ] Please stop your ]. If you continue to violate Misplaced Pages's ] by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at ], you may be ]. <!-- Template:uw-npov3 --> ] (]) 20:08, 1 December 2018 (UTC) | ] Please stop your ]. If you continue to violate Misplaced Pages's ] by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at ], you may be ]. <!-- Template:uw-npov3 --> ] (]) 20:08, 1 December 2018 (UTC) | ||
| Note to 'Beyond My Ken'--the very presentation of this page is not a NPOV nor is it encyclopedic. What you call "disruptive editing" is simply my attempt to balance the article toward those things that are verifiable. Previous editors, potentially including yourself, have falsely placed the Harpy's Weekly illustration from November 20, 1869 as an example of something espousing "American Nationalism" rather than American Exceptionalism, a concept that by contrast is well founded. When you use the word "thus" in an encyclopedia article as you did, it stretches all credulity that you are an adherent of NPOV policy, much less a legitimate advocate for it.] (]) 02:29, 3 December 2018 (UTC) | Note to 'Beyond My Ken'--the very presentation of this page is not a NPOV nor is it encyclopedic. What you call "disruptive editing" is simply my attempt to balance the article toward those things that are verifiable. Previous editors, potentially including yourself, have falsely placed the Harpy's Weekly illustration from November 20, 1869 as an example of something espousing "American Nationalism" rather than American Exceptionalism, a concept that by contrast is well founded. When you use the word "thus" in an encyclopedia article as you did, it stretches all credulity that you are an adherent of NPOV policy, much less a legitimate advocate for it.] (]) 02:29, 3 December 2018 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 02:29, 3 December 2018
October 2018
Hello, I'm Beyond My Ken. Misplaced Pages is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to American nationalism seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:08, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
November 2018
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Misplaced Pages articles, as you did to American nationalism. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:08, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
December 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at American nationalism, you may be blocked from editing. Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:08, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
Note to 'Beyond My Ken'--the very presentation of this page is not a NPOV nor is it encyclopedic. What you call "disruptive editing" is simply my attempt to balance the article toward those things that are verifiable. Previous editors, potentially including yourself, have falsely placed the Harpy's Weekly illustration from November 20, 1869 as an example of something espousing "American Nationalism" rather than American Exceptionalism, a concept that by contrast is well founded. When you use the word "thus" in an encyclopedia article as you did, it stretches all credulity that you are an adherent of NPOV policy, much less a legitimate advocate for it.Michael in oc (talk) 02:29, 3 December 2018 (UTC)