Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
* '''Comment''' Just so everyone knows, 2 3 and 4 where the original choices. But if anyone wants to include more there’s a wealth of them in the Commons. ] (]) 00:56, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
* '''Comment''' Just so everyone knows, 2 3 and 4 where the original choices. But if anyone wants to include more there’s a wealth of them in the Commons. ] (]) 00:56, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
*'''2''' seems to be the best pic. Whatever the result of this discussion, each of the pics is acceptable. ] (]) 14:47, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
*'''2''' seems to be the best pic. Whatever the result of this discussion, each of the pics is acceptable. ] (]) 14:47, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' Can we close this RfC by May 29th? As it states above, {{tq|This article will appear on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 30, 2019}}. ] (]) 18:39, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
Revision as of 18:40, 11 May 2019
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Scarlett Johansson article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
This article was copy edited by Twofingered Typist, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on October 28, 2017.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors
When discussion has ended, remove this tag and it will be removed from the list. If this page is on additional lists, they will be noted below.
Can we please change the lead image now? One from this decade, even? She looks completely different from 23 than 34. And fortunately there are many to choose from. Reasonable images include
Support 5 (or another cropped version of the original), followed by 4. I feel the the existing image isn't what people think of anymore because she looks so young there. 2 looks too sultry with her mouth open and 3 has a microphone blocking her. But I support 3 too if folks don't mind the microphone. @Trillfendi: do you mind my changes? Kolya Butternut (talk) 00:26, 5 May 2019 (UTC)Kolya Butternut (talk) 20:26, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
Support 3 - 1 is nearly a decade old, 2 is fine, 3 is fine, 4 and 5 are both blurry and imho both are awful,
I would consider 2 and 3 to be the best images however 3 is more recent hence that one being my preference. –Davey201019:45, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
I wouldn't state that "she looks completely different from 23 than 34." If it was the case that she did, we wouldn't recognize her. As seen at Talk:Scarlett Johansson/Archive 6#Request for comment on lead image, there were valid reasons given for going with the current image. And I don't see any ownership by asking us to look at this matter again. Anyway, I'd support 3 even though her face is not fully facing the camera (as in staring into the camera). If Options 4 and 5 weren't of poor quality, I'd support either of them as well. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 00:50, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
I just had to state that because on other articles there is mêlée going on practically every 2 weeks about lead images and if someone changes it and points out why the other image is bad they’re accused of “ownership”. Trillfendi (talk) 00:56, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
I think that's an incorrect (pedantic) inference of what Trillfendi meant by "completely different". In my opinion, using the words casually, I think in the current image she looks like a girl and in all of the other images she looks like a woman. I think that's more representative of who she is and what readers expect to see. Kolya Butternut (talk) 04:27, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
And I think you're unnecessarily making something out of nothing. Spillover from Talk:Woman perhaps? I know what Trillfendi meant. But if you look at the previous image discussion, you can see that I don't think that Johansson looks drastically different from then to now. She does not look so different now that she would not be recognizable to readers coming to this article and seeing the current lead image. If I thought so, I would not have supported the image. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 04:19, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Comment Just so everyone knows, 2 3 and 4 where the original choices. But if anyone wants to include more there’s a wealth of them in the Commons. Trillfendi (talk) 00:56, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
Comment Can we close this RfC by May 29th? As it states above, This article will appear on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 30, 2019. Kolya Butternut (talk) 18:39, 11 May 2019 (UTC)