Revision as of 04:34, 11 January 2005 editInShaneee (talk | contribs)15,956 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:51, 11 January 2005 edit undoGtrmp (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users25,952 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*'''Delete''' -- Definite '''copyvio'''. Remove the lyrics and it is a sub-sub-sub-stub. ] 04:25, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' -- Definite '''copyvio'''. Remove the lyrics and it is a sub-sub-sub-stub. ] 04:25, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC) | ||
*'''Delete''' It would be a bad trend to let this stand. --] 04:34, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' It would be a bad trend to let this stand. --] 04:34, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC) | ||
*'''Redirect''' to the relevant album. -] 04:51, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:51, 11 January 2005
Hey jealousy
Lyrics are not an article, and I doubt the song would be sufficiently notable to merit it's own article anyway. Also possibly a copyvio, though opinions differ on this. --fvw* 01:44, 2005 Jan 11 (UTC)
- Delete. Although I think it's a notable song - and hella catchy - it risks copyvio and the lyrics alone don't deserve their own page. All you need to do is mention the song on the band's page under "Hits" or "Singles". I'd say that's enough. LockeShocke 01:46, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)
- Hey, delete! —tregoweth 02:14, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, Misplaced Pages is not a lyrics database, possible copyright violation. Megan1967 03:56, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, copyvio, not an article. Wyss 04:22, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete -- Definite copyvio. Remove the lyrics and it is a sub-sub-sub-stub. DCEdwards1966 04:25, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete It would be a bad trend to let this stand. --InShaneee 04:34, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to the relevant album. -Sean Curtin 04:51, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)