| Revision as of 13:39, 29 July 2020 editPraxidicae (talk | contribs)Edit filter helpers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers169,003 edits Warning: Three-revert rule on Ashish A. Chanchlani. (TW)← Previous edit |
Revision as of 03:17, 30 July 2020 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,385,862 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User_talk:DMySon/Archives/2020. (BOT)Tags: Replaced Manual revertNext edit → |
| Line 13: |
Line 13: |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
== July 2020 == |
|
|
] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 13:39, 29 July 2020 (UTC) |
|
