Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
Bee|contribs]])</sup> 20:41, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Bee|contribs]])</sup> 20:41, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Shut up and mind you own business to idiot, your going to be blocked for breaking the 3RR on the Brett Favre page along with PSUMark2006, you were not fixing vandalism, so that requires a suspension and you better quit bothering me, starwars1955
{{RPA}} your going to be blocked for breaking the 3RR on the Brett Favre page along with PSUMark2006, you were not fixing vandalism, so that requires a suspension and you better quit bothering me, starwars1955
Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}| as you did at ]}}, you will be ] for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. <!-- Template:Npa3 --> ] 23:49, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}| as you did at ]}}, you will be ] for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. <!-- Template:Npa3 --> ] 23:49, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Revision as of 23:50, 28 December 2006
Thank you for experimenting with Misplaced Pages. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Jaranda03:15, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
I'm a[REDACTED] user and we are voting not to include the currently on pace stuff on this page, it's very unnessary because what Brett is on pace to do, isn't what he will do.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Starwars1955 (talk • contribs)
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Brett Favre. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.
PsyMar07:31, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
I want you to check and see who posted the playoff stats, I typed all that and who included most of the records and milestones stats, those were me to, I built this site and quit telling me I'm deleting these people's stuff, they did't build this site, I did, I have a right to edit incorrect info and what Brett Favre is on pace to do is not his correct stats, and I may Edit.
I also placed a warning on the other person's page for adding it back repeatedly -- both of you are responsible for the edit war. Sort it out in the talk page. Also, please try to remember to use edit summaries.
PsyMar07:43, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
I will do that and I'm glad you have written me, it's a back and forth war about the current pace after the stats on the bottom, I wish you would allow me to edit it, it doesn't belong, what Brett is on pace to do is not what he will do and it's totally unnessary and I've gotten complaint emails, but everytime I edit it, it's gets put back on by the other person, right now it's voted 1-1 to remove it, but it shouldn't be there, Thanks, starwars1955
Why are you siding with them and protecting there addition to the current pace that doesn't belong there, they added that and your protecting that, this does fall under wikipedias NOR policy. Starwars1955
Blocked
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.
No I won't so shut up king bee, I did no wrong so shut up or you'll be reported — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starwars1955 (talk • contribs)
Yes, you did. I'm referring to this edit here. Your edit summary is unnecessarily volatile. Also, please don't tell me to shut up, because that sounds like a personal attack. Lastly, please remember to sign your posts on talk pages using 4 tildes, like this ~~~~. Thank you. --King Bee19:41, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Yes, please stop. It's against talk page guidelines. You're free to archive the page if you like, but not to blank. --King Bee21:06, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Would you both shut up, you don't run wikipedia, especially a stupid kid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starwars1955 (talk • contribs)
Yes, it's true, I do not run wikipedia. However, neither do you; neither does any one person. We are a community, and it's hard to be a community when people make personal attacks and blank pages. So please, refrain from blanking your talk page, and refrain from making personal attacks. --King Bee21:11, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Starwars1955, please try to be civil. Before making such a reply again please read through the article on personal attacks, especially the section labeled consequences, particularly the part that states "Users have been banned for repeatedly engaging in personal attacks. Abusive edit summaries are particularly ill-regarded." Thank you for your attention in this matter. I have good faith that you really only desire to help improve WP. If we all start behaving with less hostility towards one another we may be able to accomplish something. Adam Weeden21:19, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Adam is right about this situation, the whole reason here is to improve wikipedia, he seems like a level headed person, but king bee and aviper2k7 is being very immature with there comments trying to provoke others[REDACTED] members, I not going to get into confrontation with you king bee and aviper2k7, so you can stop trying, your just upset because your current pace had to be removed, well I'm sorry you want to break wikipedias NOR and NOT policys, but even adam said it can't be on there, so I'm not answering king bee and aviper2k7 comments anymore, I'm not getting kicked off here for this, like adam says it's all about improving wikipedia, and everybody should act mature and civil, everybody over 18 should know better than to bicker like this, I agree with you adam weeden and thanks for your imput, I won't be answering uncivil comments from aviper2k7 and king bee from here on out, starwars1955— Preceding unsigned comment added by starwars1955 (talk • contribs)
I have not left any uncivil comments on your talk page. Please do not say that I have, this sounds like a personal attack. Furthermore, I was not involved in the discussion you had with AdamWeeden and aviper2k7, so I don't know what you're talking about. Lastly, please remember to sign your posts on talk pages using 4 tildes, like this ~~~~. Thank you. --King Bee21:34, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
In all honesty I do not care about the current pace issue, I just want you to stop being such a terrible Wikipedian and stop attacking people. After all, you were the one who called us all idiots. And please sign your posts with four tidles.++aviper2k7++ 21:37, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for disrupting Misplaced Pages by making personal attacks. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. (aeropagitica)21:35, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Ok, I've not made any personal attacks here and I've been ganned up on by king bee and aviper2k7, king bee has just told aviper2k7 he doesn't deserved to be blocked for doing the same thing to me that I've just been suspended for, when I'm not even been attacking anyone, aviper2k7 just attacked me in the brett favre discussion page with his last post, please suspend him aeropagitica or what you just suspended me for, you had no right to suspend me, my last post was not an attack and specifically said I won't be answering provokes by king bee and aviper2k7, and king bee just told aviper2k7 in aviper2k7's discussion page that he's not wrong fot attacking me, but king bee is warning me, this isn't right and they should both be suspended for there actions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starwars1955 (talk • contribs)
No, at User talk:Aviper2k7, I have left a friendly warning on his page reminding him to remain calm and refrain from personal attacks, just like I did with you; the first time. After you persisted in making personal attacks, that is when I began using warning templates. Again, please remember to sign your posts on talk pages using 4 tildes, like this ~~~~. Thank you. --King Bee21:47, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
It doesn't matter, I just got on here to remove the current pace crap, it was a violation of wikipedia's NOR and NOt policy's and adam weeden and aviper2k7 are stupid idiots point blank, look at the excuse adam weeden just gave in the discussion area under citation, brett favre and dan marino are the top 2 in points scored by a quarterback, that's passing and rushing TDS and the games by quarterback stats are right, earl morrall and bland don't have more games at quarterback than the other three, they are mostly from kicking and punting, and kicking points don't count with points by a quarterback, they are separate, people at the dan marino page don't remove good stats and bicker, they just provide the info and let it go, aviper2k7 and adam weeden are stupid idiots and are ruing the brett favre page with there stupidity. George blanda has 2,002 points by kicking, that is separate to points by quarterback, which dan marino holds the record and favre is following and the marino[REDACTED] is not wrong. Morten andersen is the all time nfl scorer with kicking, dan marino most nfl points by quarterback, that's rushing and passing TDs, I don't want to be on this page, just wanted to get the current pace stuff off, you people need to stick to a topic you know about, starwars1955 — Preceding unsigned comment added by starwars1955 (talk • contribs)
Continuing to make personal attacks won't help the fact that you are blocked. Please refrain from doing so. Also, please do not make edits like this one. This is considered vandalism. Thank you. --King Bee22:13, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Goodbye wikipedia, hope you get you stuff straight, because all the stuff in the records and milestones is correct information, hope it stays one there, it makes the page unique, starwars1955 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starwars1955 (talk • contribs)
Sign your posts on talk pages
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --King Bee22:13, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from blanking your talk page. Feel free to archive it, but don't blank it. By the way 3RR doesn't apply to those who are reverting vandalism, so User:1568 will not be blocked for reverting your vandalism to your talk page. Thank you. –King Bee13:55, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you blank a page, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. –King Bee
Bee|contribs]]) 20:41, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
(Personal attack removed) your going to be blocked for breaking the 3RR on the Brett Favre page along with PSUMark2006, you were not fixing vandalism, so that requires a suspension and you better quit bothering me, starwars1955
Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. Heimstern Läufer23:49, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
User talk:Starwars1955: Difference between revisions
Add topic
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --King Bee 22:13, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
