Revision as of 02:06, 10 December 2020 editPrimeBOT (talk | contribs)Bots2,079,652 editsm →top: Task 24: replacement of a template following a TFDTag: AWB← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:52, 12 April 2021 edit undoHueMan1 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers82,882 edits →Proposed merge of COVID-19 testing controversy in the Philippines into Philippine government response to the COVID-19 pandemic: new sectionTag: TwinkleNext edit → | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
{{WikiProject Viruses|class=C|importance=Low}} | {{WikiProject Viruses|class=C|importance=Low}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Proposed merge of ] into ] == | |||
This should be summarised at and merged with ] since the controversy didn't age well: this happened for a very short time and the Philippines managed to maximise its testing capacity. The PhilHealth controversy is far more notable than this one. —<span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Tw Cen MT;color:black">] (] <small>•</small> ])</span> 01:52, 12 April 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:52, 12 April 2021
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Philippine government response to the COVID-19 pandemic article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
|topic=
not specified. Available options:
Material from COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines was split to Philippine government response to the COVID-19 pandemic on 23 July 2020. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. The former page's talk page can be accessed at Talk:COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines. |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Proposed merge of COVID-19 testing controversy in the Philippines into Philippine government response to the COVID-19 pandemic
This should be summarised at and merged with Philippine government response to the COVID-19 pandemic since the controversy didn't age well: this happened for a very short time and the Philippines managed to maximise its testing capacity. The PhilHealth controversy is far more notable than this one. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 01:52, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Categories:- Misplaced Pages articles under general sanctions
- All unassessed articles
- C-Class COVID-19 articles
- Low-importance COVID-19 articles
- WikiProject COVID-19 articles
- C-Class Disaster management articles
- Low-importance Disaster management articles
- C-Class medicine articles
- Low-importance medicine articles
- C-Class pulmonology articles
- Unknown-importance pulmonology articles
- Pulmonology task force articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages
- C-Class Philippine-related articles
- Mid-importance Philippine-related articles
- WikiProject Philippines articles
- C-Class virus articles
- Low-importance virus articles
- WikiProject Viruses articles