| Revision as of 17:01, 10 January 2007 editVeinor (talk | contribs)19,743 edits remove personal site per WP:EL← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:42, 10 January 2007 edit undoTheGreatScott (talk | contribs)51 edits Removed defamatory material, personal sites and articles posted without permission from author(s). TgSNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| A '''Levitron''' is a device consisting of a ] that floats mid-air above a base unit by means of ] stabilized ] . The name '''Levitron''' is ] by Creative Gifts, Inc. | |||
| The '''Levitron''' is a commercial toy designed to produce and display the phenomenon known as “spin-stabilized magnetic levitation”. Consisting essentially of a permanent magnetic top and base plate, ring or alternate geometric configuration, the toy’s construction is relatively simple; nevertheless, the theory underlying the Levitron’s operation is considerable and remains incomplete, while parameters of functionability – the rate of top rotation, top weighting, etc… – are generally considered somewhat stringent. Employing principles of the magnetic field and gyroscopic stabilization, the Levitron induces levitation in its top through a series of interactive steps as described under “Operation”. Because the levitated top’s stabilizing rotation undergoes natural, gradual diminishment, unless spin-sustaining measures are employed, the levitation interval generally will not exceed four minutes. | |||
| == Operation == | == Operation == | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| Lee O. Heflinger, S. L. Ridgway|format=HTML}}</ref> (see: ]) | Lee O. Heflinger, S. L. Ridgway|format=HTML}}</ref> (see: ]) | ||
| == Trademark Litigation history == | |||
| == History == | |||
| '''Levitron''' was the source of trademark litigation in United States District Court of New Mexico. Creative Gifts, Inc., the owner of the Levitron trademark, brought suit against Michael and Karen Sherlock and their company UFO, alleging infringement and seeking a permanent injunction. The district court, Judge LeRoy C. Hansen, held that the mark was infringed, and rejected all of the Sherlocks' defenses and counterclaims. | |||
| The first spin-stabilized magnetic levitation device was invented in the late 1970's by Roy Harrigan, who patented the device in 1983. An alternate device incorporating notable design advantages (including a flat adjustable base that obviated Harrigan's method of manipulating washers to make oft-needed adjustments to the weight of the top) was independently invented by Joseph Chieffo in 1984 (Ref. "The Hidden History of the Levitron - The Other Real Inventor", 5/30/1999). This device was narrowly commercialized in kit form in 1988. Employing principles discovered, developed and materialized by Harrigan and Chieffo, entrepreneur William Hones introduced a third device in the mid-1990's. In 1995, Hones secured a patent for the device, the popular toy now known as the Levitron. | |||
| It is important to note that the circumstances surrounding the evolution, patenting and trademarking of this last device have been the source of enduring controversy. Two articles examining the Levitron's history - "The Hidden History of the Levitron" by Mike and Karen Sherlock, and "An Amazing Invention and a Patent Failure" by Rod Driver - present considerable evidence challenging William Hones' status as the inventor of the Levitron while providing substantial grounds for establishing Roy Harrigan and Joseph Chieffo as the inventors of the first spin-stabilized permanent magnetic levitation devices, commonly referred to as "levitrons". | |||
| On appeal to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, the Levitron mark was enforced in favor of its owner. ''Creative Gifts, Inc. v. UFO,'' 235 F.3d 540 (10th Cir. 2000)(New Mexico). Specifically, the court affirmed the district court (1) that the term 'Levitron' is ''not'' a ] term, and that the specific categories of evidence proffered by the Sherlocks in support of their claim, including internet sites purporting to demonstrate generic use, failed; (2) that the district court's assignment of the levitron.com domain originally procured by the Sherlocks to Creative was proper; (3) that no theory of ] could be asserted against Creative by the Sherlocks; and (4) that no "naked license" of the Levitron mark had been granted by Creative. All 23 of the counterclaims made by the Sherlocks were rejected. The court affirmed a permanent injunction against the Sherlocks. | |||
| ==References== | ==References== | ||
| Line 22: | Line 23: | ||
| * | * | ||
| * | * | ||
| * | |||
| * , by Rod Driver, Providence Journal Sept 1999 | * , by Rod Driver, Providence Journal Sept 1999 | ||
| ] | ] | ||
Revision as of 17:42, 10 January 2007
A Levitron is a device consisting of a spinning top that floats mid-air above a base unit by means of spin stabilized magnetic levitation . The name Levitron is trademarked by Creative Gifts, Inc.
Operation
Making the Levitron levitate is not trivial, and the procedure can be difficult to learn. First, a plastic plate is placed on top of the magnetic base and the top is spun on the plate. Then the plate is lifted by hand until, if all the conditions are right, the top rises above it to the equilibrium point. If the top is too heavy, it will never rise above the plate, and if the top is too light, it will fly off in a random direction. For this reason, washers of various masses are included in the kit that can be placed on the spindle of the top to adjust its weight. The spin rate of the top must also fall within a narrow range around 25 rotations per second. Since it can be difficult to spin the top fast enough by hand, Creative Gifts makes a battery-powered, handheld device to spin the top with an electric motor. After a few minutes, the top falls when air friction slows it below the critical speed.
Physics
Earnshaw's theorem does not allow for a static configuration of permanent magnets to stably levitate another permanent magnet or materials that are paramagnetic or ferromagnetic against gravity. This theorem does not apply to the Levitron (a magnetic top), however, because the non-static nature of the spinning top acts as a gyroscope to prevent the magnetic field of the top from aligning itself in the same direction as that of the magnetic base (ie: via the top flipping). This gyroscopic property combined with the top's precession allows it to respond dynamically to the direction of the local toroidally shaped field of its base magnet and remain levitating in a force minima at a central point in space above the base. (see: Magnetic levitation)
Trademark Litigation history
Levitron was the source of trademark litigation in United States District Court of New Mexico. Creative Gifts, Inc., the owner of the Levitron trademark, brought suit against Michael and Karen Sherlock and their company UFO, alleging infringement and seeking a permanent injunction. The district court, Judge LeRoy C. Hansen, held that the mark was infringed, and rejected all of the Sherlocks' defenses and counterclaims.
On appeal to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, the Levitron mark was enforced in favor of its owner. Creative Gifts, Inc. v. UFO, 235 F.3d 540 (10th Cir. 2000)(New Mexico). Specifically, the court affirmed the district court (1) that the term 'Levitron' is not a generic term, and that the specific categories of evidence proffered by the Sherlocks in support of their claim, including internet sites purporting to demonstrate generic use, failed; (2) that the district court's assignment of the levitron.com domain originally procured by the Sherlocks to Creative was proper; (3) that no theory of promissory estoppel could be asserted against Creative by the Sherlocks; and (4) that no "naked license" of the Levitron mark had been granted by Creative. All 23 of the counterclaims made by the Sherlocks were rejected. The court affirmed a permanent injunction against the Sherlocks.
References
- Martin D. Simon, UCLA Department of Physics,
Lee O. Heflinger, S. L. Ridgway (1997). "Spin stabilized magnetic levitation" (HTML). American Journal of Physics. Retrieved 2006-12-06.
{{cite web}}: line feed character in|author=at position 46 (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
External links
- Levitron Home Page
- The Levitron®, an adiabatic trap for spins, Dr. Michael Berry,
- Wholesaler of items bearing the registered trademark
- Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals Decision
- Online-Simulation of the Levitron (Java-Applet)
- Amazing Invention and a Patent Failure , by Rod Driver, Providence Journal Sept 1999