Line 1:
{{pp-move|small=yes}}{{pp-semi-indef}}
{{shortcut|WP:Legality of Israeli settlements}}
*This Inconvention 2012has furtherbeen discussionsuperseded tookby placediscussion , with clarification .▼
{{cot|Previous consensus}}
== Settlement illegality text ==
Through a long process ], the following text has established consensus:
*'''The international community considers Israeli settlements in (the Golan Heights/the West Bank/East Jerusalem) illegal under international law, but the Israeli government disputes this.'''
==Guidance and further discussion==
* Guidance on use from the original discussion at ]:
**From LHvU: "there is agreement of the use of the wording in articles both of multi section length, and single section/stub standard"▼
**According to LHvU's clarification: "I found that there was consensus for the wording per proposal 2, and for it to be included in the opening paragraph(s) of multi section articles, where it may be expanded per WP:LEDE in the article body, and to be used without further expansion in stub or very short articles."▼
**According to LHvU at Arbitration enforcement: "Only in some articles, those which had a brief introduction and then a body of one or two sections, was there disagreement on ''how'' it was to be incorporated - but not ''if''.▼
**From T. Canens at Arbitration Enforcement: "As the objection has been made clear, I expect Nableezy <ref>added by Carwil, who drafted these notes</ref> to either conform their future edits to the consensus wording as determined by LHvU, or obtain consensus for their new version."▼
===Guidance===
▲* In 2012 further discussion took place , with clarification .
We also have the following guidance on its use.
▲**From LHvU: "there is agreement of the use of the wording in articles both of multi section length, and single section/stub standard"
▲**According to LHvU's clarification: "I found that there was consensus for the wording per proposal 2, and for it to be included in the opening paragraph(s) of multi section articles, where it may be expanded per WP:LEDE in the article body, and to be used without further expansion in stub or very short articles."
▲**According to LHvU at Arbitration enforcement: "Only in some articles, those which had a brief introduction and then a body of one or two sections, was there disagreement on ''how'' it was to be incorporated - but not ''if''.
▲**From T. Canens at Arbitration Enforcement: "As the objection has been made clear, I expect Nableezy <ref>added by Carwil, who drafted these notes</ref> to either conform their future edits to the consensus wording as determined by LHvU, or obtain consensus for their new version."
==Notes==
{{reflist}}
{{cob}}
|