| Revision as of 18:51, 25 January 2021 editCasprings (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,762 editsNo edit summaryTag: 2017 wikitext editor← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:52, 25 January 2021 edit undoCasprings (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,762 editsNo edit summaryTag: 2017 wikitext editorNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| |- bgcolor="#fafeff" | |- bgcolor="#fafeff" | ||
| | | | | ||
| '''Reasons to use the verb "attack."''' | |||
| '''1.''' Attack meets ] better than any other verb. Using a ] search and only looking at the '''titles''', one can see that writers use the term attack in WP:RS news sources more than other words. One note on methodology, I think only searching in the title is the best means to understand what WP:RS are naming the event. | '''1.''' Attack meets ] better than any other verb. Using a ] search and only looking at the '''titles''', one can see that writers use the term attack in WP:RS news sources more than other words. One note on methodology, I think only searching in the title is the best means to understand what WP:RS are naming the event. | ||
Revision as of 18:52, 25 January 2021
|
Reasons to use the verb "attack." 1. Attack meets Misplaced Pages:COMMONNAME better than any other verb. Using a google news search and only looking at the titles, one can see that writers use the term attack in WP:RS news sources more than other words. One note on methodology, I think only searching in the title is the best means to understand what WP:RS are naming the event. · attack is used 193,000 times · Riot used 67,700 times, · insurrection used 15,400 times · storming used 6,340 times. 2. Attack is inherently a neutral word but captures the significance of the event. Attacks can be negative or positive, depending on the circumstances—for example, the Attack on Pearl Harbor versus Art Attack. In sum, attack best meets WP:NPV. Reasons not to use "storm." 1. As the results show, storm is a terrible choice for Misplaced Pages:COMMONNAME. 2. Storm is not the right choice for WP:NPV. First, I would note the connection of the word storm to QAnon. Second, I would note the links the participants made between the event and Storming of the Bastille. For example, a quote from the New York Times, here. It's like the Storming of the Bastille as recreated by the cast of National Lampoon's Animal House. These photos will outlive us all — Ben Sixsmith Given the historical circumstances, the word storm maximizes seeing the events in a positive light. Reasons to no include the year 1. Misplaced Pages:NOYEAR applies here. As the event is closer to Chernobyl disaster as far as a historical event. As the policy says, "Some articles do not need a year for disambiguation when, in historical perspective, the event is easily described without it." Using a year is a judgment call, but I suggest the year is not needed. |