| Revision as of 23:17, 17 April 2021 editSandyGeorgia (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors279,123 edits →Anna Laetitia Barbauld: re← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:40, 17 April 2021 edit undoSlimVirgin (talk | contribs)172,064 edits replyNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| *Could someone add citation tags to the uncited text? I can only see one at the moment. Also, where can I find what caused "other editors pointed out that this article had earned for Misplaced Pages a spot in the journal literature, saying it spread inaccuracies, since corrected"? ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 22:45, 17 April 2021 (UTC) | *Could someone add citation tags to the uncited text? I can only see one at the moment. Also, where can I find what caused "other editors pointed out that this article had earned for Misplaced Pages a spot in the journal literature, saying it spread inaccuracies, since corrected"? ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 22:45, 17 April 2021 (UTC) | ||
| *: {{u|SlimVirgin}} I believe that Victoria has addressed most of the cn and or tags; I don’t believe any more tagging is needed. Victoria deleted the mention of Misplaced Pages from the article, but you can see it still on the talk page in the Press mentions box. ] (]) 23:17, 17 April 2021 (UTC) | *: {{u|SlimVirgin}} I believe that Victoria has addressed most of the cn and or tags; I don’t believe any more tagging is needed. Victoria deleted the mention of Misplaced Pages from the article, but you can see it still on the talk page in the Press mentions box. ] (]) 23:17, 17 April 2021 (UTC) | ||
| *::I can only see one page of the source, where it seems to say that the WP article reflects what was generally believed at some point. I can't see the next page. is the version that was promoted. Does it deal with that issue poorly? ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 23:40, 17 April 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:40, 17 April 2021
Anna Laetitia Barbauld
Anna Laetitia Barbauld (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Notified: Carbon Caryatid, Bmcln1, Iridescent, WP England, WP Bio, WP Children's literature, WP Poetry, WP Women's History, WP Women writers, 2021-02-28
This is a 2007 FAR whose main editor is deceased. When noticed for a FAR at the end of February, the article had uncited text and original research. I asked other editors if they had the sources to begin repair, but found no one able to take on the task. Subsequently, other editors pointed out that this article had earned for Misplaced Pages a spot in the journal literature, saying it spread inaccuracies, since corrected. A new editor fixed some of them, but the article still has uncited text, original research, and now missing page numbers. Salvaging this requires access to a number of sources to sort out original research from citable text, and get the page numbers correct. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:01, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
- This statement in the third para of the lead is lacking context: “Barbauld's reputation was further damaged when many of the Romantic poets ... “ The lead could benefit from expansion. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 05:35, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Move to FARC, improved, but still has uncited text, original research, and the lead has not been corrected. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:08, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Move to FARC There were improvements to the lede, but no progress towards citation needed and original research concerns. Z1720 (talk) 15:21, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Victoriaearle: I see you've been working on this; do you feel the issues raised are things you would be able to address? Nikkimaria (talk) 02:42, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Nikkimaria, it's a bit early to tell. Because the Hemingway articles need tending right now, (thanks for your help in that regard!), I've been around more than I'd like and I started idly picking at it. One important issue has been resolved in the body (not the lead yet), but I'm not sure how invested I am, whether it's possible to resolve the other issues w/out access to the literature, or how much citation/accessiblity, etc. work needs to be done. To be honest I'm on the fence as to whether it should just be delisted, or to put in the work for a decent salvage job. Is it okay if I report back in a few days after assessing a bit more? Victoria (tk) 20:08, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- Sure, see what you think. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:34, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- Whatever happens, thanks for trying. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:29, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Nikkimaria, it's a bit early to tell. Because the Hemingway articles need tending right now, (thanks for your help in that regard!), I've been around more than I'd like and I started idly picking at it. One important issue has been resolved in the body (not the lead yet), but I'm not sure how invested I am, whether it's possible to resolve the other issues w/out access to the literature, or how much citation/accessiblity, etc. work needs to be done. To be honest I'm on the fence as to whether it should just be delisted, or to put in the work for a decent salvage job. Is it okay if I report back in a few days after assessing a bit more? Victoria (tk) 20:08, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- Could someone add citation tags to the uncited text? I can only see one at the moment. Also, where can I find what caused "other editors pointed out that this article had earned for Misplaced Pages a spot in the journal literature, saying it spread inaccuracies, since corrected"? SarahSV 22:45, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- SlimVirgin I believe that Victoria has addressed most of the cn and or tags; I don’t believe any more tagging is needed. Victoria deleted the mention of Misplaced Pages from the article, but you can see it still on the talk page in the Press mentions box. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:17, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- I can only see one page of the source, where it seems to say that the WP article reflects what was generally believed at some point. I can't see the next page. This is the version that was promoted. Does it deal with that issue poorly? SarahSV 23:40, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- SlimVirgin I believe that Victoria has addressed most of the cn and or tags; I don’t believe any more tagging is needed. Victoria deleted the mention of Misplaced Pages from the article, but you can see it still on the talk page in the Press mentions box. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:17, 17 April 2021 (UTC)