| Revision as of 03:13, 3 February 2007 editQuackGuru (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users79,978 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:14, 3 February 2007 edit undoQuackGuru (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users79,978 edits →New Ideas DiscussionNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| == New Ideas Discussion == | == New Ideas Discussion == | ||
| Not really. Misplaced Pages is pretty informal. I'd recommend posting it to your userspace and then ask someone to take a look and see what they think. --]<sup>]</sup> 02:17, 3 February 2007 (UTC) | Not really. Misplaced Pages is pretty informal. I'd recommend posting it to your userspace and then ask someone to take a look and see what they think. --]<sup>]</sup> 02:17, 3 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == ] Discussion == | |||
Revision as of 03:14, 3 February 2007
Quack Talk: DiscussionHello, and Welcome to the Misplaced Pages, QuackGuru! Thanks for creating the "List of articles related to quackery" article. Here are a few perfunctory tips to hasten your acculturation into the Misplaced Pages experience:
And some odds and ends: Cite your sources, Civility, Conflict resolution, How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Pages needing attention, Peer review, Policy Library, Verifiability, Village pump, and Wikiquette; also, you can sign your name on any page by typing four tildes: ~~~~. Best of luck, QuackGuru, and most importantly, have fun! Ombudsman 20:34, 31 December 2006 (UTC) Thank You. --QuackGuru 23:44, 2 February 2007 (UTC) New Ideas DiscussionNot really. Misplaced Pages is pretty informal. I'd recommend posting it to your userspace and then ask someone to take a look and see what they think. --Woohookitty 02:17, 3 February 2007 (UTC) List of pseudosciences and pseudoscientific concepts Discussion |