| Revision as of 17:13, 24 February 2022 editNo Great Shaker (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers61,970 edits +1← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:46, 3 March 2022 edit undoFlybd5 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users583 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
| | minthreadstoarchive = 1 | | minthreadstoarchive = 1 | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == Your reversion of edits on ] == | |||
| Please stop blindly reverting my edits to ]. I have provided citations to support what I wrote in the section on 1938. These are not my opinions, but those of historians as well as the subject addressed in the changes. If you know of opposing viewpoints, then either add them to the section or discuss them in the talk page. You should avoid starting edit wars. ] (]) 19:46, 3 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ] == | == Your ] nomination of ] == | ||
Revision as of 19:46, 3 March 2022
 | This user is busy doing a thousand things and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
| This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:No_Great_Shaker. |
| This is No Great Shaker's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 10 days  |
Your reversion of edits on ]
Please stop blindly reverting my edits to A total and unmitigated defeat. I have provided citations to support what I wrote in the section on 1938. These are not my opinions, but those of historians as well as the subject addressed in the changes. If you know of opposing viewpoints, then either add them to the section or discuss them in the talk page. You should avoid starting edit wars. Flybd5 (talk) 19:46, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1772 English cricket season
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1772 English cricket season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Guettarda -- Guettarda (talk) 17:00, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1772 English cricket season
The article 1772 English cricket season you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1772 English cricket season for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Guettarda -- Guettarda (talk) 00:00, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1772 English cricket season
The article 1772 English cricket season you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:1772 English cricket season for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Guettarda -- Guettarda (talk) 14:01, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Congratulations on getting this to GA! JH (talk page) 14:43, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Hello again, JH, and thank you. I had some great help and it got there in the end. I'm learning a lot from these articles. Will pick up some more before long. Hope you are well and all the best. No Great Shaker (talk) 17:00, 24 February 2022 (UTC)