Talk:Amy Biehl: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 06:13, 20 April 2022 editDavid Eppstein (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators227,055 edits →Content dispute: r← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:38, 20 April 2022 edit undoJune Parker (talk \| contribs)361 edits →Content dispute Next edit →
Line 54:		Line 54:
	::If we do that, you get to have "Anti-white slur" in the article more properly laid out according to the source. ] (]) 03:45, 20 April 2022 (UTC)		::If we do that, you get to have "Anti-white slur" in the article more properly laid out according to the source. ] (]) 03:45, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
	:::Again, you are imposing YOUR OPINIONS that "One Settler! One Bullet!" is not an anti-white slur. I'm not even going to try to argue with you about whether that opinion is accurate because to do so would miss the point. The source we have for this event explicitly states otherwise. On Misplaced Pages we go by what published reliable sources have to say, not our own opinions. —] (]) 06:13, 20 April 2022 (UTC)		:::Again, you are imposing YOUR OPINIONS that "One Settler! One Bullet!" is not an anti-white slur. I'm not even going to try to argue with you about whether that opinion is accurate because to do so would miss the point. The source we have for this event explicitly states otherwise. On Misplaced Pages we go by what published reliable sources have to say, not our own opinions. —] (]) 06:13, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
			::::You are the one misrepresenting a source to appeal to your white genocide fantasy, your "Big scary muscular black dude invasion" fantasy. If you insist on being intellectually dishonest and breaking the rules, I can't help you. Have the day you deserve. ] (]) 19:38, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:38, 20 April 2022

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Education Low‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

[REDACTED]

South Africa Mid‑importance

[REDACTED]	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

United States Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.

United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article was nominated for deletion on 29 April 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

whereabouts of the murderers

I just read in an article that the murderers became rape suspects after their release. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2000/02/28/60II/main165933.shtml —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.19.109.52 (talk) 15:54, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Stuff:

"Three convicted of murdering Stanford graduate Amy Biehl." Stanford University. October 25, 1994.

WhisperToMe (talk) 07:30, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

sources

We're not using stormfront, racialist papers, and similar junk as sources here. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 13:35, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Amy Biehl. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.info.gov.za/speeches/1998/98729_0w0699810056.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:48, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Amy Biehl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716161441/http://southafrica.usembassy.gov/news100825ct.html to http://southafrica.usembassy.gov/news100825ct.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:31, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Content dispute

@David Eppstein: Please talk to me here instead of the edit section now, I understand I haven't contacted you until your third revert so I'm making an effort now.

Please explain to me what you mean by "reintroducing old broken deadlinks for article references", as I haven't introduced a single reference in the article. And secondly please explain why you are so insistant on labelling an anti-imperialist slogan as an "Anti-white" slogan? The slogan "One Settler One Bullet" is anti-imperialist in nature and only indicates the murder was commited because the men assumed Biehl to be responsible for colonization, not because she was white. Excluding the quote and attempting to label it as anti-white when it is not is dishonest to the sources we are using. June Parker (talk) 21:01, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

One of my edits changed a broken link to the LA Times article to a working link. You undid that and reintroduced the broken link. I am insistent on calling it an "anti-white" slogan because that is what our sources call it. We need to rely on published reliable sources, not on your personal opinion on whether the intended meaning of that slogan is socioeconomic rather than racist (as if it could only be one or the other). —David Eppstein (talk) 01:00, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

@David Eppstein: Thanks for letting me know, I'll be sure to avoid altering links on accident in the future. But I don't see why you would accuse me of doing it on purpose as if I were attempting to damage the article. Also, like I said, the source you pointed out later specifies the "Slur" as "One Settler! One Bullet!" which is (1) a slogan, not a slur, and (2), not anti-white, but anti imperialist. This is not my personal definition, it's an opinion held by people who do not have a grudge against black Africans for despising exploitation, or white Africans for exploiting. It's the neutral viewpoint. I'm more concerned about why you view "We don't like being hunted down by colonizers" as "I hate white people" since you want to bring personal opinions into it.

To boot, per WP:CITELEAD, this information does not exist in the body of the article, so keeping it in the lead without support isn't that proper for an article. However I'll relent and say the opinion that the chants directed at the murder victim were racist is valid. LA times is the only source that (According to you) claims the slogan is a slur, so if you're right it would be more appropriote to add something like "The killers chanted One Settler One Bullet, which was dubbed by LA times as an Anti-White slur in context" in the Death section

If we do that, you get to have "Anti-white slur" in the article more properly laid out according to the source. June Parker (talk) 03:45, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Again, you are imposing YOUR OPINIONS that "One Settler! One Bullet!" is not an anti-white slur. I'm not even going to try to argue with you about whether that opinion is accurate because to do so would miss the point. The source we have for this event explicitly states otherwise. On Misplaced Pages we go by what published reliable sources have to say, not our own opinions. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:13, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

You are the one misrepresenting a source to appeal to your white genocide fantasy, your "Big scary muscular black dude invasion" fantasy. If you insist on being intellectually dishonest and breaking the rules, I can't help you. Have the day you deserve. June Parker (talk) 19:38, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Categories: