Misplaced Pages

Irredentism: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:41, 26 February 2005 editKahkonen (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,446 edits Irredentist disputes: Finland← Previous edit Revision as of 20:49, 6 March 2005 edit undoKoavf (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,174,994 edits Irredentist disputes: - Greater MoroccoNext edit →
Line 24: Line 24:
* In World War II, Finland lost ]. After the ], ] is revived. * In World War II, Finland lost ]. After the ], ] is revived.
* ]i claims to ] before the ] * ]i claims to ] before the ]
* ] of ] attempted to reintegrate so-called "]" from the entirety of ], ], and ]and portions of ] starting in ]. This lead to a border war with Algeria and the annexation of Western Sahara in 1976.
* ] claims to the ] (] - present) and western ] in ].


=="Triadic nexus" of irredenta conflict== =="Triadic nexus" of irredenta conflict==

Revision as of 20:49, 6 March 2005

Irredentism is claiming a right to territories belonging to another state on the grounds of common ethnicity and/or prior historical possession, actual or alleged. The word was coined in Italy from the phrase Italia irredenta ("unredeemed Italy"). This originally referred to Austro-Hungarian rule over mostly or partly Italian-inhabited territories in the northern Adriatic such as Trentino and Trieste during the 19th and early 20th century. An area subjected to an irredentist claim is therefore sometimes called an irredenta.

Irredentist disputes

Not all territorial disputes are irredentist, although they are often couched in irredentist terms to strengthen public support.

Other prominent irredentist disputes have included:

"Triadic nexus" of irredenta conflict

In his 1996 book, Nationalism Reframed, Rogers Brubaker outlined a pattern to describe a common theme of irredentist conflict, referred to as the "triadic nexus".

Irredenta conflict is a conflict between three parties: a nationalizing state, a national movement representing an ethnic minority within that state, and an external national homeland, to which that minority is construed as ethnically belonging. Brubaker's triadic nexus is a visual representation of this, granting each party a corner of the triangle. The implication is that the national minority is caught between the nationalizing state within whose borders it exists, and the external homeland to which it is seen as belonging.

See also

Irredentism: Difference between revisions Add topic