Misplaced Pages

User talk:Malo: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:24, 4 March 2007 edit71.76.138.214 (talk) Replaced page with 'ur gay as hell'← Previous edit Revision as of 19:25, 4 March 2007 edit undoKunrian (talk | contribs)44 edits Undid revision 112621519 by 71.76.138.214 (talk)Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{User:Malo/talkheader}}
ur gay as hell

== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XII - February 2007 ==

The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

<small>Delivered by ] 15:44, 1 March 2007 (UTC) </small>

==Villiers_Club==
Please could you undelete Villiers_Club. It is no less notable than Bullingdon_Club or Piers_Gaveston_Society. Part of the history of Oxford. Thank you. ] 04:04, 2 March 2007 (UTC) (AdrianHealey1)
:I deleted it because there was no claim or sources as to what makes this club notable. If there exists independent sources and accounts which have covered this group, it may be deemed notable, but thus far we have nothing to go on. -- ] <small>] ]</small> 04:10, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
:The criterion seems to be whether or not the club lists notable old members, which it does have. The trouble is that I am not willing to publish their names without their permission, which they won't give, so I'm being punished for being discreet. 04:26, 2 March 2007 (UTC) (AdrianHealey1)
::Please sign your comments with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. Also even if you have the names of supposedly notable members, you must be able to verify that information based upon reliable sources, (please see ] and ] respectively). -- ] <small>] ]</small> 05:44, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

== Nazi cross ==

Hi! I noticed that you deleted the page ], which was a redirect to ]. My rationale for creating this redirect was that "swastika" is a word that can be difficult to remember and to spell, and it is quite likely that people might use "nazi cross" as a search term since the swastika has come to be associated with the Nazi movement. Knowing this, maybe you would reconsider your deletion of this redirect? ] 23:26, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
::Hello. I haven't heard anything from you on this subject, so I have recreated the redirect. If you still think it should be deleted, feel free to list it at ]. ] 23:51, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
:Sorry for the delayed response. I've been reviewing my actions and I'm not exactly certain why at the time I felt it was an inaccurate term, however I won't oppose its recreation. Sorry for the inconvenience, and thank you for bringing the matter to my attention. -- ] <small>] ]</small> 00:48, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:25, 4 March 2007

Note: Typically I respond to questions/comments right here. If you would like for me to respond on your talk page, I'd be happy to, just make a small mention of it in your message. Also please start a new topic at the bottom of the page. Don't forget to sign your message with ~~~~ Failure to sign your comments may result in their removal. Thanks for stopping by.

Fair Use Notices: I no longer upload fairuse images - If you have a notice for me regarding fair use rationales or orphan unfree images, please check the image upload logs. It is most likely that I resized an image and the previous uploader's info was deleted. Please try to notify them, I will not try keep any unfree image on wiki. Thanks.

Archive Because of their length, the previous discussions on this page have been Archived.
  1. 11 March 2005 - 29 November 2005
  2. 30 November 2005 - 20 December 2005
  3. 21 December 2005 - 18 March 2006
  4. 19 March 2006 - 30 April 2006
  5. 1 May 2006 - 18 June 2006
  6. 19 June 2006 - 30 June 2006
  7. 1 July 2006 - 5 July 2006
  8. 6 July 2006 - 26 July 2006
  9. 27 July 2006 - 8 September 2006
  10. 9 September 2006 - 15 December 2006
  11. 16 December 2006 - 28 February 2007
  12. 1 March 2007 - 6 June 2007
  13. 7 June 2007 - 7 November 2007
  14. 8 November 2007 - 31 December 2008
  15. 2009
  16. 2010

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XII - February 2007

The February 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 15:44, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Villiers_Club

Please could you undelete Villiers_Club. It is no less notable than Bullingdon_Club or Piers_Gaveston_Society. Part of the history of Oxford. Thank you. Adrianhealey1 04:04, 2 March 2007 (UTC) (AdrianHealey1)

I deleted it because there was no claim or sources as to what makes this club notable. If there exists independent sources and accounts which have covered this group, it may be deemed notable, but thus far we have nothing to go on. -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 04:10, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
The criterion seems to be whether or not the club lists notable old members, which it does have. The trouble is that I am not willing to publish their names without their permission, which they won't give, so I'm being punished for being discreet. 04:26, 2 March 2007 (UTC) (AdrianHealey1)
Please sign your comments with ~~~~. Also even if you have the names of supposedly notable members, you must be able to verify that information based upon reliable sources, (please see Misplaced Pages:Attribution and Misplaced Pages:Reliable sources respectively). -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 05:44, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Nazi cross

Hi! I noticed that you deleted the page Nazi cross, which was a redirect to Swastika. My rationale for creating this redirect was that "swastika" is a word that can be difficult to remember and to spell, and it is quite likely that people might use "nazi cross" as a search term since the swastika has come to be associated with the Nazi movement. Knowing this, maybe you would reconsider your deletion of this redirect? Byxakissaren 23:26, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Hello. I haven't heard anything from you on this subject, so I have recreated the redirect. If you still think it should be deleted, feel free to list it at Redirects for discussion. Byxakissaren 23:51, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Sorry for the delayed response. I've been reviewing my actions and I'm not exactly certain why at the time I felt it was an inaccurate term, however I won't oppose its recreation. Sorry for the inconvenience, and thank you for bringing the matter to my attention. -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 00:48, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
User talk:Malo: Difference between revisions Add topic