| Revision as of 21:21, 4 March 2007 editDaddy Kindsoul (talk | contribs)19,776 edits oops missed one for archive← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:45, 4 March 2007 edit undoMarskell (talk | contribs)22,422 edits Explicit warningNext edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| '''Note''' - Automated bots are not welcome on my talkpage, I consider edits by bots to be ] and will be deleted. Any other form of spamming will be automatically removed from the page too. | '''Note''' - Automated bots are not welcome on my talkpage, I consider edits by bots to be ] and will be deleted. Any other form of spamming will be automatically removed from the page too. | ||
| == Explicit warning == | |||
| Deathrocker, you have immediately archived warnings I have sent you as a disinterested admin. They '''were''' warnings. I've tried to be even-handed in writing them and I find your archiving unhelpful as it's against practice to remove warnings. It can all still be viewed in the history, but I re-post because I want it to be clear: you have been warned by me about a 3RR violation, and about the consequences of enflaming disputes, particularly considering a previous Arb case. This editor has not suggested you were only responsible for baiting, but did advice you against baiting. | |||
| To be explicit: | |||
| * If you archive this post in short order (ie., before it can be shown that you've moved on from your recent disputes), I will take it to the ] and let people decide there. (Not as a punative thing—simply because, if my warnings are going to be shuffled off a take page in minutes, I'll make a point of having other admins look at them.) | |||
| * If it wasn't clear, I will block you for a week if I notice, from now on, you're violating ArbComm rulings regarding your editing. ] 21:45, 4 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:45, 4 March 2007
You have new messages (last change).
| ||
|
Old messages will be archived once read, thanks.
Note - Automated bots are not welcome on my talkpage, I consider edits by bots to be spam and will be deleted. Any other form of spamming will be automatically removed from the page too.
Explicit warning
Deathrocker, you have immediately archived warnings I have sent you as a disinterested admin. They were warnings. I've tried to be even-handed in writing them and I find your archiving unhelpful as it's against practice to remove warnings. It can all still be viewed in the history, but I re-post because I want it to be clear: you have been warned by me about a 3RR violation, and about the consequences of enflaming disputes, particularly considering a previous Arb case. This editor has not suggested you were only responsible for baiting, but did advice you against baiting.
To be explicit:
- If you archive this post in short order (ie., before it can be shown that you've moved on from your recent disputes), I will take it to the Administrators Noticeboard and let people decide there. (Not as a punative thing—simply because, if my warnings are going to be shuffled off a take page in minutes, I'll make a point of having other admins look at them.)
- If it wasn't clear, I will block you for a week if I notice, from now on, you're violating ArbComm rulings regarding your editing. Marskell 21:45, 4 March 2007 (UTC)