Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 14:14, 30 December 2022

• WP:AN/3
• WP:AN3
• WP:AN/EW
• WP:ANEW
• WP:AN/3RR

This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

• See this guide for instructions on creating diffs for this report.
• If you see that a user may be about to violate the three-revert rule, consider warning them by placing {{subst:uw-3rr}} on their user talk page.

You must notify any user you have reported.

You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.

You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Additional notes

• When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
• The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
• Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
• Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.

Definition of edit warring

Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)

Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Twinkle's ARV can be used on the user's page to more easily report their behavior, including automatic handling of diffs.

User:107.190.33.254 reported by User:VQuakr (Result: Semiprotected one year under BLPDS)

Page: December 15, 2022 Twitter suspensions (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: 107.190.33.254 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 23:33, 27 December 2022 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on December 15, 2022 Twitter suspensions."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

1. Talk:December 15, 2022 Twitter suspensions#unconstructive / combative edit-warring

Comments: User conveniently left out the part where I reverted this edit of mine upon realising it looked like edit-warring.

1. 1. 23:33, 27 December 2022‎ Undid revision 1129961512 by 107.190.33.254 (talk)
   2. 23:32, 27 December 2022 (UTC) "Undid revision 1129961335 by VQuakr (talk) Please remove the bits that bother you instead of such a widespread revert, thanks!"
   3. 23:33, 27 December 2022 (UTC) "Undid revision 1129961512 by 107.190.33.254 (talk)"

I make a lot of edits since I am on my phone and it's fiddly to make one large edit. If the user had told me that this behaviour was problematic, we could've discussed, next time please contact me and discuss the issue instead of immediately going to the noticeboard, cheers!

Also, user notified me # 23:33, 27 December 2022 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on December 15, 2022 Twitter suspensions." and then refused to explain himself any further, simply jumping the gun on going to the noticeboard

@VQuakr: Thank you for reporting this. I have tried to resolve things on the IP user's talk page, on the article talk page, and have requested page protection specifically due to the combative edits from 107.190.33.254. They are not working to build consensus, this is becoming extremely tiresome to deal with. Thank you for your help. Cheers! 98.155.8.5 (talk) 23:56, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

I genuinely believed we were just having a somewhat tense, but interesting, back and forth, with each of us reverting and modifying what the other did, I'd like to point out that while this did mean combative editing, this IS how consensus is built, and running off to noticeboards is not constructive editing by any means, cheers

! 107.190.33.254 (talk) 00:01, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Group 11 is literally a single edit which, to my knowledge, I have not changed since 107.190.33.254 (talk) 00:17, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

I'll acknowledge that some of those do show me reverting other people's edits, but I've stopped editing the page to show those were spur of the moment mistakes 107.190.33.254 (talk) 00:37, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

You've stopped editing the page because it's now protected. :)

At least you can't edit-war on this page anymore, but I think your behavior still warrants a block. Cheers! 98.155.8.5 (talk) 01:15, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

I wasn't edit-warring to start with, and I think your bad faith behaviour should still warrant a block, cheers! 107.190.33.254 (talk) 17:01, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

• Result: Page semiprotected one year by User:ToBeFree under WP:BLPDS. EdJohnston (talk) 02:00, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

User:Gjonesagain reported by User:Andrevan (Result: Blocked)

Page: Russia investigation origins counter-narrative (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: Gjonesagain (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 00:14, 28 December 2022 (UTC) "Undid revision 1129966541 by Shoerack (talk)"
2. 00:07, 28 December 2022 (UTC) "/* Mueller investigation and "complete and total exoneration" */ This section is not relevant. This section was labeled as a "talking point" for the Mueller Special Counsel investigation and should be added to that article, not this one."
3. 23:50, 27 December 2022 (UTC) "/* Mueller investigation and "complete and total exoneration" */ Removing as not relevant to this article"
4. (on similar but different page)

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 23:53, 27 December 2022 (UTC) "General note: Removal of content, blanking."
2. 00:00, 28 December 2022 (UTC) "/* December 2022 */ Reply"
3. 00:29, 28 December 2022 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring."

Comments: 3 reverts and another revert on a different page after warning. Responded to my warnings by templating back with disruptive edit warning. WP:SPA here to bowlderize the Mueller report page. Andre🚐 02:59, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 31 hours Not a violation of the brightline 3RR (only 3 reverts in 24 hrs), but still disruptive and sanctionable. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 06:24, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

User:AhmetYu reported by User:Bon courage (Result: Indefinitely blocked)

Page: Martin Kulldorff (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: AhmetYu (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 15:15, 28 December 2022 (UTC) "Undid revision 1130071280 by MrOllie (talk) There is no consensus, see Talk for details. Peer-reviewed scientific source is necessary for NPOV if "False" shall be kept."
2. 07:28, 28 December 2022 (UTC) "Undid revision 1130023545 by Bon courage (talk) Consensus on that talk is irrelevant to the argument that the mentioned source is not peer-reviewed research but just an opinion. There is a more graving consensus about that source on Misplaced Pages demonstrating it does not deliver a peer-reviewed publication with respect to WP:MEDRS"
3. 07:20, 28 December 2022 (UTC) "Remove "False" because source scientifically not reliable. The context requires peer-reviewed research as reference for calling it "False""
4. 07:17, 28 December 2022 (UTC) "Undid revision 1129963627 by Firefangledfeathers (talk) Quoting some random author doesn't make it more scientific, a peer-review is required here to claim it being false, talking about random authors opinions won't suffice. Sciencebasedmedicine.org is not a peer-reviewed publication with respect to WP:MEDRS, see WP:SBM . Why would one insist on calling it "False", let the reader decide it if you can't deliver proves"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 07:21, 28 December 2022 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

1. 07:33, 28 December 2022 (UTC) "/* False? */ Reply"

Comments:

After invoking Hitler on the Talk page, with this edit the editor is now at 5RR. Bon courage (talk) 16:00, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

• Indefinitely blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:32, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

User:A.Musketeer reported by User:AMomen88 (Result: Stale)

Page: Sheikh Hasina (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: A.Musketeer (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. "Where are the facts in your edit?"
2. "get consensus for your problematic edit"
3. "use talk page to get consensus, opinion pieces are not facts"

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

Comments:

The user has engaged in a relentless edit war, reverting me edits on more than three occasions within a 24 hour period- a clear violation of the 3RR. The user has constantly reinserted material which biases the lead and skews the neutrality of the article.  —AMomen88 (talk) 00:28, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Comment - Listing your own diff as mine to make it four when there is no violation of 3RR by me is probably the most dishonest conduct I have seen in[REDACTED] so far. This user has been constantly trying to remove content which are critical to the subject despite multiple editors continuously and patiently trying to make him understand his faults. He has just returned from his second block over edit warring on this article and this report appears to be just another of his disruptions. A.Musketeer (talk) 01:09, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

• Stale Bbb23 (talk) 00:51, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

User:156.214.112.44 reported by User:R Prazeres (Result: Declined; parties discussing on talk page)

Page: Khan el-Khalili (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: 156.214.112.44 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 19:08, 29 December 2022 (UTC) "I didn't do anything wrong, you are the one harassing me and removing well-sourced info. We need an administrator here."
2. 18:49, 29 December 2022 (UTC) "The page isn't owned by anyone, I am providing a source here. This is clearing against Misplaced Pages rules regarding removing well-sourced content."
3. 18:36, 29 December 2022 (UTC) "It's a local bazaar, nothing wrong with my edit. And yes it witnessed so many changes in purpose than present day hence why the word first."

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 19:01, 29 December 2022 (UTC) "/* December 2022 edit-warring */ new section"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

1. 19:11, 29 December 2022 (UTC) "/* Edit-warring in lead */ new section"

Comments:

Edit-warring over wording in the lead. (Note: I linked the talk page comment addressing their edits, but they resumed edit-warring while I was writing it so it's kind of moot, I'm reporting this before hitting 3RR.) R Prazeres (talk) 19:14, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Kindly I am the one who provided source to my edit, and my edit was undone with just threats and without any reasons given witin the edit-summary, only threats. Also I am the one who asked for an administrator to interfere, and when they did, the user removed 331dot's warning to make it appear like I am the only warned one which is very manipulative. 156.214.112.44 (talk) 20:08, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

You were given brief reasons for the revert from the start in the edit summary, as is normal practice. If you wanted me to explain more you could have asked me directly on my talk page or the article talk page, where I'd happily respond. When you reinstated your edit you were given very clear warnings and instructions here and here. You choose to ignore them and continue edit-warring. No "threats" were made; the whole point of warning you is to give you the chance to stop your disruptive behaviour before this needs to be reported. If you refrain from further edit-warring and take future disagreements to the talk page first, then ideally no further action needs to be taken on this IP. R Prazeres (talk) 22:20, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

• @156.214.112.44 and R Prazeres: the way I see it, you're both edit warring... Since you seem to be talking now, my hope is that this can be resolved without needing blocks. Can you both please agree to take this to the article's talk page and follow WP:DISPUTE, without further reverts? Salvio 22:40, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

  Getting the problem to move to the talk page instead of the editing history is exactly why I came here, so yes, of course. Thanks for your help. R Prazeres (talk) 23:14, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Declined Editors took it to the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 05:12, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

User:VideoGamerKing reported by User:MrOllie (Result: Blocked 48 hours)

Page: Avengers (comics) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: VideoGamerKing (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 00:54, 30 December 2022 (UTV) "I can do this all day."
2. 00:11, 30 December 2022 (UTC) "Can whoever is replacing my list with the one with the Hulk kindly stop? He's not on the team and with mine I cover more bases than potentially miss any current members."
3. 23:36, 29 December 2022 (UTC) "Whoever keeps undoing my list please stop. All of the members that I am featuring are a part of the Avengers team in All-Out Avengers and Secret Invasion Vol 2, which, as far as we know, take place in Earth-616. I am basing this list on heroes that where prominently featured in those issues alongside the other members because that's the comic confirming that they're a part of the team at that moment. So please stop undoing my list."
4. 22:09, 29 December 2022 (UTC) ""
5. 21:56, 29 December 2022 (UTC) ""
6. 19:31, 29 December 2022 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 22:15, 29 December 2022 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

1. 00:10, 30 December 2022 (UTC) "/* Infobox character list */ new section"

Comments:

This user doesn't seem to have ever used a talk page, though they have recently found edit summaries - though there is no indication they are reading anyone else's summaries. MrOllie (talk) 00:15, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

The user in question is still edit-warring Jacob Wilkerson (talk) 02:06, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Blocked – for a period of 48 hours Daniel Case (talk) 05:17, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

User:Agmonsnir reported by User:86.190.146.190 (Result: Semi-protected)

Page: Co-cathedral (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Agmonsnir (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. "Revert previous to spam by potential trol"
2. "Revert - an anonymous troll that took most the article off...."

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

Comments:

The user has reverted four times in a short space of time, with nonsensical edit summaries which include personal attacks. A little dig into their editing history suggests that they are motivated primarily by a dislike of anonymous editors (see for example "Might be correct, but not when coming from anonymous who cannot be a part of a discussion") 86.190.146.190 (talk) 10:20, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Indeed, an anonymous user that takes off 17,663 characters, most of the work that was invested in the article by many, is a potential troll. He made no detailed explanation for this deletion, except "Removed unencyclopaedic material. Writing out in prose data which has no real encyclopaedic value and should be tabulated if it did, really is a waste of time". If this is done by a registered entity, the correct way to make such a change is to open a discussion about the article, and be open to potential other thoughts. Agmonsnir (talk) 10:56, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

As I see it, this article has a massive problem which is likely best resolved by healthy application of WP:TNT. Almost the entire thing is in violation of WP:OR. BrigadierG (talk) 14:14, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

• The article has been semi-protected for one week by Lord Roem.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:14, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

User:86.174.76.28 reported by User:BrigadierG (Result: )

Page: Peter Maxwell Davies (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: 86.174.76.28 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 14:08, 30 December 2022 (UTC) "Undid revision 1130507413 by BrigadierG (talk) you do that if you think there is something here of any value"
2. 14:00, 30 December 2022 (UTC) "Undid revision 1130501607 by Tommi1986 (talk) do not lie. if you disagree with my edit, you are obliged to say why."
3. 12:37, 30 December 2022 (UTC) "Undid revision 1130495874 by Tommi1986 (talk) do not lie. if you disagree with my edit, you are obliged to say why."

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 14:07, 30 December 2022 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

• Misplaced Pages noticeboards
• Misplaced Pages edit warring