Hysterical realism: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 08:47, 11 February 2007 editSmackBot (talk \| contribs)3,734,324 editsm Date/fix maintenance tags← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:16, 8 March 2007 edit undoBoating Helvetia (talk \| contribs)1 edit removing Christopher Wunderlee's vanity self-promotionNext edit →
Line 3:		Line 3:
	The term ''hysterical realism'' was coined by ] in an essay on ]'s '']'', titled "The Smallness of the 'Big' Novel: Human, All Too Inhuman", which appeared in the July 24, 2000 issue of '']'' and was later reprinted in Wood's 2004 book, ''The Irresponsible Self: On Laughter and the Novel''. Wood uses the term to denote the contemporary conception of the "big, ambitious novel" that pursues "vitality at all costs" and consequently "knows a thousand things but does not know a single human being." He decried the genre as an attempt to "turn fiction into social theory," and an attempt to tell us "how the world works rather than how somebody felt about something." Wood points to ] and ] as the forefathers of the genre, which survives in writers like ] and ]. In response, ] described ''hysterical realism'' as a "painfully accurate term for the sort of overblown, manic prose to be found in novels like my own '']''..." Wood's line of argument echoes many common criticisms of ] art as a whole. In particular Wood's attacks on Delillo and Pynchon clearly echo the similar criticisms that ] and other critics lodged against them a generation earlier.		The term ''hysterical realism'' was coined by ] in an essay on ]'s '']'', titled "The Smallness of the 'Big' Novel: Human, All Too Inhuman", which appeared in the July 24, 2000 issue of '']'' and was later reprinted in Wood's 2004 book, ''The Irresponsible Self: On Laughter and the Novel''. Wood uses the term to denote the contemporary conception of the "big, ambitious novel" that pursues "vitality at all costs" and consequently "knows a thousand things but does not know a single human being." He decried the genre as an attempt to "turn fiction into social theory," and an attempt to tell us "how the world works rather than how somebody felt about something." Wood points to ] and ] as the forefathers of the genre, which survives in writers like ] and ]. In response, ] described ''hysterical realism'' as a "painfully accurate term for the sort of overblown, manic prose to be found in novels like my own '']''..." Wood's line of argument echoes many common criticisms of ] art as a whole. In particular Wood's attacks on Delillo and Pynchon clearly echo the similar criticisms that ] and other critics lodged against them a generation earlier.

	The "hysterical" prose style is often mated to "realistic", almost journalistic, effects, such as Pynchon's depiction of 18th century ]s in '']'', ]'s treatment of ] in '']''~~, ]'s exploration of the mission to the moon in ]~~, or Robert Clark Young's treatment of the arcana of ] life in '']''. This extravagant treatment of everyday events can be found in the work of earlier authors, such as ]'s '']'', ]'s ] novels, and ]'s '']'' and '']''. Even earlier precursors include '']'' by ], often cited as the first ] novel,{{Fact\|date=February 2007}} and '']'' by ]. A less "hysterical" version of such a juxtaposition of essay and narrative passages can be found in the work of ].		The "hysterical" prose style is often mated to "realistic", almost journalistic, effects, such as Pynchon's depiction of 18th century ]s in '']'', ]'s treatment of ] in '']'', or Robert Clark Young's treatment of the arcana of ] life in '']''. This extravagant treatment of everyday events can be found in the work of earlier authors, such as ]'s '']'', ]'s ] novels, and ]'s '']'' and '']''. Even earlier precursors include '']'' by ], often cited as the first ] novel,{{Fact\|date=February 2007}} and '']'' by ]. A less "hysterical" version of such a juxtaposition of essay and narrative passages can be found in the work of ].

	It is interesting to note, additionally, that hysterical realism resembles an older, more established literary tradition: the classic Russian novel. The works of ], ] and ], as well as others, are long epic books about a large ensemble of characters. The prose in these novels is rich and thick, going into extreme detail about all manner of things.		It is interesting to note, additionally, that hysterical realism resembles an older, more established literary tradition: the classic Russian novel. The works of ], ] and ], as well as others, are long epic books about a large ensemble of characters. The prose in these novels is rich and thick, going into extreme detail about all manner of things.

Revision as of 20:16, 8 March 2007

Hysterical realism, also called recherché postmodernism or maximalism, is a literary genre typified by a strong contrast between elaborately absurd prose, plotting, or characterization and careful detailed investigations of real specific social phenomena.

The term hysterical realism was coined by James Wood in an essay on Zadie Smith's White Teeth, titled "The Smallness of the 'Big' Novel: Human, All Too Inhuman", which appeared in the July 24, 2000 issue of The New Republic and was later reprinted in Wood's 2004 book, The Irresponsible Self: On Laughter and the Novel. Wood uses the term to denote the contemporary conception of the "big, ambitious novel" that pursues "vitality at all costs" and consequently "knows a thousand things but does not know a single human being." He decried the genre as an attempt to "turn fiction into social theory," and an attempt to tell us "how the world works rather than how somebody felt about something." Wood points to Don DeLillo and Thomas Pynchon as the forefathers of the genre, which survives in writers like David Foster Wallace and Salman Rushdie. In response, Zadie Smith described hysterical realism as a "painfully accurate term for the sort of overblown, manic prose to be found in novels like my own White Teeth..." Wood's line of argument echoes many common criticisms of postmodernist art as a whole. In particular Wood's attacks on Delillo and Pynchon clearly echo the similar criticisms that Gore Vidal and other critics lodged against them a generation earlier.

The "hysterical" prose style is often mated to "realistic", almost journalistic, effects, such as Pynchon's depiction of 18th century land surveys in Mason & Dixon, Don DeLillo's treatment of Lee Harvey Oswald in Libra, or Robert Clark Young's treatment of the arcana of U.S. Navy life in One of the Guys. This extravagant treatment of everyday events can be found in the work of earlier authors, such as Mikhail Bulgakov's The Master and Margarita, Mervyn Peake's Gormenghast novels, and Herman Melville's The Confidence-Man and Moby-Dick. Even earlier precursors include Tristram Shandy by Laurence Sterne, often cited as the first postmodernist novel, and The Anatomy of Melancholy by Robert Burton. A less "hysterical" version of such a juxtaposition of essay and narrative passages can be found in the work of Milan Kundera.

It is interesting to note, additionally, that hysterical realism resembles an older, more established literary tradition: the classic Russian novel. The works of Tolstoy, Dostoyevsky and Solzhenitsyn, as well as others, are long epic books about a large ensemble of characters. The prose in these novels is rich and thick, going into extreme detail about all manner of things.

Hysterical realist authors

External links

Categories:

Misplaced Pages