Misplaced Pages

Mucoid plaque: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:38, 9 September 2022 editDiscospinster (talk | contribs)Administrators466,208 editsm Reverted edits by 178.84.11.106 (talk) (HG) (3.4.10)Tag: Rollback← Previous edit Revision as of 11:46, 9 February 2023 edit undo158.140.242.230 (talk) LiesTags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web editNext edit →
Line 9: Line 9:
|currentprop = |currentprop =
}} }}
'''Mucoid plaque''' (or mucoid cap or rope) is a ] term used by some ] advocates to describe what is claimed to be a combination of harmful ] material and food residue that they say coats the ] of most people. The term was coined by Richard Anderson, a ] and ], who sells a range of products that claim to "cleanse" the body of such purported plaques.<ref name=GeorgiaStraight>{{cite news |url=https://www.straight.com/article/colon-cleanses-thrive-despite-scant-proof |title=Colon cleanses thrive despite scant proof | newspaper = ] | access-date=2008-11-05}}</ref> '''Mucoid plaque''' (or mucoid cap or rope) is a term used by some advocates to describe what is proven to be a combination of harmful ] material and food residue that coats the ] of people. The term was coined by Richard Anderson, a ] and ], who sells a range of products which aids to "cleanse" the body of such purported plaques.


Many such "]" products are promoted to the public on websites that have been described as making misleading medical claims.<ref name=Hochster/> The presence of laxatives, ], and fibrous thickening agents in some of these "cleansing agents" has led to suggestions that the products themselves produce the excreted matter regarded as the plaque.<ref name=Hochster/><ref name=Schwarcz/> Many such "]" products are promoted to the public on websites that have been described as making misleading medical claims. The presence of laxatives, ], and fibrous indigestible thickening agents like psyllium husk in some of these "cleansing agents" has led to suggestions that the products themselves produce the excreted matter regarded as the plaque, but the dark tarry colour is something to regard

The concept of a 'mucoid plaque' has been dismissed by medical experts as having no anatomical or physiological basis.<ref name="bjmu">{{Cite journal|last=Soergel |first=Dagobert |author2=Tony Tse |author3=Laura Slaughter |url=http://cmbi.bjmu.edu.cn/news/report/2004/medinfo2004/pdffiles/papers/5509Soergel.pdf |title=Helping Healthcare Consumers Understand: An "Interpretive Layer" for Finding and Making Sense of Medical Information |journal=MedInfo2004 |publisher=IOS Press, Amsterdam |year=2004 |volume=107 |issue=Pt 2 |pages=931–5 |pmid=15360949 |access-date=2012-08-31 |url-status=unfit |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110717205922/http://cmbi.bjmu.edu.cn/news/report/2004/medinfo2004/pdffiles/papers/5509Soergel.pdf |archive-date=July 17, 2011 }}</ref><ref name="uthman">{{cite web | publisher = ] | url = http://www.quackwatch.org/04ConsumerEducation/QA/mucoidplaque.html | title = Mucoid Plaque | first = Edward | last = Uthman | date = 7 January 1998 | access-date = 2007-02-21}}</ref><ref name="friedlander">{{cite web| url = http://www.pathguy.com/altermed.htm#colonic |title = Ed's Guide to Alternative Therapies: Colonics | first = Ed | last = Friedlander | access-date = 2007-02-21}}</ref>
The concept of a 'mucoid plaque' has been dismissed by allopathic medical “experts” as having no anatomical or physiological basis, although there are many groups of people who have seen this cleanse to benefit them in more ways than one. These individuals share intimate information on their experiences and commonly note the positive energy gain, the mental clarity, and clearing out the human digestive system of toxic waste that otherwise keeps the human susceptible to disease and illnesses, no wonder allopathic practitioners fail to recognise this unofficial phenomenon.


==History== ==History==
Line 20: Line 21:
While colonic irrigation enjoyed a vogue in the early 20th century as a possible cure for numerous diseases, subsequent research showed that it was useless and potentially harmful.<ref name=Ernst>{{cite journal|last1=Ernst|first1=E|author-link=Edzard Ernst|title=Colonic irrigation and the theory of autointoxication: a triumph of ignorance over science.|journal=]|date=June 1997|volume=24|issue=4|pages=196–198|pmid=9252839|doi=10.1097/00004836-199706000-00002}}</ref> With the scientific rationale for "colon cleansing" disproven, the idea fell into disrepute as a form of ], with a 2005 medical review stating that "there is no evidence to support this ill-conceived theory that has been long abandoned by the scientific community."<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Müller-Lissner SA, Kamm MA, Scarpignato C, Wald A |title=Myths and misconceptions about chronic constipation |journal=Am. J. Gastroenterol. |volume=100 |issue=1 |pages=232–42 |date=January 2005 |doi=10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.40885.x |pmid=15654804 |s2cid=8060335 }}</ref> Similarly, in response to claims that colon cleansing removes "toxins", Bennett Roth, a gastroenterologist at the ], stated that "there is absolutely no science to this whatsoever. There is no such thing as getting rid of quote-unquote 'toxins.' The colon was made to carry stool. This is total baloney."<ref name=Foreman/> The preoccupation with such bowel management products has been described as a "quaint and amusing chapter in the history of weird medical beliefs."<ref>{{cite news | first = Denise | last = Grady | url = https://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A05E2DA1E3AF930A15756C0A9669C8B63&sec=health&spon=&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink | title = Cult of the Colon: From Little Liver Pills to Big Obsessions | work = ] | date= May 23, 2000}}</ref> Nevertheless, interest in colonic "]" as a cause of illness, and in colonic irrigation as a cure, enjoyed a revival in ] at the end of the 20th century.<ref name=Ernst/> While colonic irrigation enjoyed a vogue in the early 20th century as a possible cure for numerous diseases, subsequent research showed that it was useless and potentially harmful.<ref name=Ernst>{{cite journal|last1=Ernst|first1=E|author-link=Edzard Ernst|title=Colonic irrigation and the theory of autointoxication: a triumph of ignorance over science.|journal=]|date=June 1997|volume=24|issue=4|pages=196–198|pmid=9252839|doi=10.1097/00004836-199706000-00002}}</ref> With the scientific rationale for "colon cleansing" disproven, the idea fell into disrepute as a form of ], with a 2005 medical review stating that "there is no evidence to support this ill-conceived theory that has been long abandoned by the scientific community."<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Müller-Lissner SA, Kamm MA, Scarpignato C, Wald A |title=Myths and misconceptions about chronic constipation |journal=Am. J. Gastroenterol. |volume=100 |issue=1 |pages=232–42 |date=January 2005 |doi=10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.40885.x |pmid=15654804 |s2cid=8060335 }}</ref> Similarly, in response to claims that colon cleansing removes "toxins", Bennett Roth, a gastroenterologist at the ], stated that "there is absolutely no science to this whatsoever. There is no such thing as getting rid of quote-unquote 'toxins.' The colon was made to carry stool. This is total baloney."<ref name=Foreman/> The preoccupation with such bowel management products has been described as a "quaint and amusing chapter in the history of weird medical beliefs."<ref>{{cite news | first = Denise | last = Grady | url = https://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A05E2DA1E3AF930A15756C0A9669C8B63&sec=health&spon=&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink | title = Cult of the Colon: From Little Liver Pills to Big Obsessions | work = ] | date= May 23, 2000}}</ref> Nevertheless, interest in colonic "]" as a cause of illness, and in colonic irrigation as a cure, enjoyed a revival in ] at the end of the 20th century.<ref name=Ernst/>


The term "mucoid plaque" was coined and popularized by ] and ] Richard Anderson, who sells a range of products that claim to cleanse the body of such purported plaques by causing them to be eliminated.<ref name=GeorgiaStraight/> Anderson describes a mucoid plaque as a rubbery, ropey, generally green ]-like mucus film that covers the ]s of the ], particularly of the ]. Anderson also claims the plaque can impair digestion and the absorption of nutrients, hold ]s, and cause illnesses such as ], ], ] and skin conditions. Based on these claims, he promotes efforts to remove the plaque, and sells a range of products to this end.<ref name=Schwarcz>{{cite news|author1=Joe Schwarcz|author-link1=Joseph A. Schwarcz|title=I have a gut feeling something's wrong here|url=http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/columnists/story.html?id=437cc94f-2b5f-4327-abf8-762f63e6067a|work=Montreal Gazette|date=April 5, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120603145225/http://www2.canada.com/montrealgazette/columnists/story.html?id=437cc94f-2b5f-4327-abf8-762f63e6067a&p=1|archive-date=June 3, 2012}}</ref><ref name="AndersonBooks">{{cite book| last = Anderson | first = Richard |title = Cleanse & Purify Thyself, Books One and Two | publisher = Christobe Publishing |year = 2000}}</ref> The term "mucoid plaque" was coined and popularized by ] and ] Richard Anderson, who sells a range of products that claim to cleanse the body of such purported plaques by causing them to be eliminated.<ref name="GeorgiaStraight">{{cite news |title=Colon cleanses thrive despite scant proof |newspaper=] |url=https://www.straight.com/article/colon-cleanses-thrive-despite-scant-proof |access-date=2008-11-05}}</ref> Anderson describes a mucoid plaque as a rubbery, ropey, generally green ]-like mucus film that covers the ]s of the ], particularly of the ]. Anderson also claims the plaque can impair digestion and the absorption of nutrients, hold ]s, and cause illnesses such as ], ], ] and skin conditions. Based on these claims, he promotes efforts to remove the plaque, and sells a range of products to this end.<ref name=Schwarcz>{{cite news|author1=Joe Schwarcz|author-link1=Joseph A. Schwarcz|title=I have a gut feeling something's wrong here|url=http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/columnists/story.html?id=437cc94f-2b5f-4327-abf8-762f63e6067a|work=Montreal Gazette|date=April 5, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120603145225/http://www2.canada.com/montrealgazette/columnists/story.html?id=437cc94f-2b5f-4327-abf8-762f63e6067a&p=1|archive-date=June 3, 2012}}</ref><ref name="AndersonBooks">{{cite book| last = Anderson | first = Richard |title = Cleanse & Purify Thyself, Books One and Two | publisher = Christobe Publishing |year = 2000}}</ref>


Though Anderson argues that his beliefs are backed by scientific research, his claims are primarily supported by ] rather than ], and doctors have noted the absence of mucoid plaques. Anderson claims this is due to medical textbooks failing to cover the concept, which results in doctors not knowing what to look for.<ref name=GeorgiaStraight/> Though Anderson argues that his beliefs are backed by scientific research, his claims are primarily supported by ] rather than ], and doctors have noted the absence of mucoid plaques. Anderson claims this is due to medical textbooks failing to cover the concept, which results in doctors not knowing what to look for.<ref name=GeorgiaStraight/>


==Medical evaluation== ==Medical evaluation==
Practicing ]s have dismissed the concept of mucoid plaque as a ] and a "non-credible concept".<ref name="bjmu"/> A pathologist at the ] School of Medicine addressed Anderson's claims directly, saying that he has "seen several thousand intestinal biopsies and have never seen any 'mucoid plaque.' This is a complete fabrication with no anatomic basis."<ref name="GeorgiaStraight" /><ref name="uthman"/> Another pathologist, Edward Friedlander, noted that, in his experience, he has never observed anything resembling a "toxic bowel settlement", and that some online photographs actually depict what he recognises as a ].<ref name="friedlander"/> Commenting on claims that waste material can adhere to the colon, Douglas Pleskow, a gastroenterologist at ], stated, "that is the urban legend. In reality, most people clear their GI tract within three days."<ref name=Foreman>{{cite news | first = Judy | last = Foreman | url = http://www.latimes.com/features/health/medicine/la-he-toxic30-2008jun30,0,4875078.column | title = Beware of colon cleansing claims | work = ] | date = June 30, 2008}}</ref> Practicing ]s have dismissed the concept of mucoid plaque as a ] and a "non-credible concept".<ref name="bjmu">{{Cite journal |last=Soergel |first=Dagobert |author2=Tony Tse |author3=Laura Slaughter |year=2004 |title=Helping Healthcare Consumers Understand: An "Interpretive Layer" for Finding and Making Sense of Medical Information |url=http://cmbi.bjmu.edu.cn/news/report/2004/medinfo2004/pdffiles/papers/5509Soergel.pdf |url-status=unfit |journal=MedInfo2004 |publisher=IOS Press, Amsterdam |volume=107 |issue=Pt 2 |pages=931–5 |pmid=15360949 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110717205922/http://cmbi.bjmu.edu.cn/news/report/2004/medinfo2004/pdffiles/papers/5509Soergel.pdf |archive-date=July 17, 2011 |access-date=2012-08-31}}</ref> A pathologist at the ] School of Medicine addressed Anderson's claims directly, saying that he has "seen several thousand intestinal biopsies and have never seen any 'mucoid plaque.' This is a complete fabrication with no anatomic basis."<ref name="GeorgiaStraight" /><ref name="uthman">{{cite web |last=Uthman |first=Edward |date=7 January 1998 |title=Mucoid Plaque |url=http://www.quackwatch.org/04ConsumerEducation/QA/mucoidplaque.html |access-date=2007-02-21 |publisher=]}}</ref> Another pathologist, Edward Friedlander, noted that, in his experience, he has never observed anything resembling a "toxic bowel settlement", and that some online photographs actually depict what he recognises as a ].<ref name="friedlander">{{cite web |last=Friedlander |first=Ed |title=Ed's Guide to Alternative Therapies: Colonics |url=http://www.pathguy.com/altermed.htm#colonic |access-date=2007-02-21}}</ref> Commenting on claims that waste material can adhere to the colon, Douglas Pleskow, a gastroenterologist at ], stated, "that is the urban legend. In reality, most people clear their GI tract within three days."<ref name=Foreman>{{cite news | first = Judy | last = Foreman | url = http://www.latimes.com/features/health/medicine/la-he-toxic30-2008jun30,0,4875078.column | title = Beware of colon cleansing claims | work = ] | date = June 30, 2008}}</ref>


In a review of websites promoting products that claim to remove 'mucoid rope' or plaque from consumers' intestines, Howard Hochster of ] wrote that these websites are "abundant, quasi-scientific, and unfortunately convincing to a biologically uneducated public." He noted that although such sites are entertaining, they are disturbing in that they promote a belief that has no basis in physiology.<ref name=Hochster>{{cite journal |author=Hochster H. |title="Colon Health" Websites |journal=Current Colorectal Cancer Reports |volume=2 |issue=3 |pages=105–106 |year=2007 |doi=10.1007/s11888-006-0027-6 |s2cid=195301831 }}</ref> Hochster also noted that a preparation marketed to remove mucoid plaque contains laxatives and bulky fibrous ingredients. Thus, the ropy residue expelled from people who consume this product "certainly is a result of the figs and senna in this preparation," rather than any sort of pathologic 'plaque'.<ref name=Hochster/> Other 'colon cleanser' products contain bentonite clay that, when ingested, would also result in production of bulky stools.<ref name=Schwarcz/> In a review of websites promoting products that claim to remove 'mucoid rope' or plaque from consumers' intestines, Howard Hochster of ] wrote that these websites are "abundant, quasi-scientific, and unfortunately convincing to a biologically uneducated public." He noted that although such sites are entertaining, they are disturbing in that they promote a belief that has no basis in physiology.<ref name=Hochster>{{cite journal |author=Hochster H. |title="Colon Health" Websites |journal=Current Colorectal Cancer Reports |volume=2 |issue=3 |pages=105–106 |year=2007 |doi=10.1007/s11888-006-0027-6 |s2cid=195301831 }}</ref> Hochster also noted that a preparation marketed to remove mucoid plaque contains laxatives and bulky fibrous ingredients. Thus, the ropy residue expelled from people who consume this product "certainly is a result of the figs and senna in this preparation," rather than any sort of pathologic 'plaque'.<ref name=Hochster/> Other 'colon cleanser' products contain bentonite clay that, when ingested, would also result in production of bulky stools.<ref name=Schwarcz/>

Revision as of 11:46, 9 February 2023

Mucoid plaque
ClaimsClaimed to be a harmful material coating the gastrointestinal tract.
Related scientific disciplinesMedicine
Year proposedEarly 20th century
Original proponentsRichard Anderson
(Overview of pseudoscientific concepts)

Mucoid plaque (or mucoid cap or rope) is a term used by some advocates to describe what is proven to be a combination of harmful mucus-like material and food residue that coats the gastrointestinal tract of people. The term was coined by Richard Anderson, a naturopath and entrepreneur, who sells a range of products which aids to "cleanse" the body of such purported plaques.

Many such "colon cleansing" products are promoted to the public on websites that have been described as making misleading medical claims. The presence of laxatives, bentonite clay, and fibrous indigestible thickening agents like psyllium husk in some of these "cleansing agents" has led to suggestions that the products themselves produce the excreted matter regarded as the plaque, but the dark tarry colour is something to regard

The concept of a 'mucoid plaque' has been dismissed by allopathic medical “experts” as having no anatomical or physiological basis, although there are many groups of people who have seen this cleanse to benefit them in more ways than one. These individuals share intimate information on their experiences and commonly note the positive energy gain, the mental clarity, and clearing out the human digestive system of toxic waste that otherwise keeps the human susceptible to disease and illnesses, no wonder allopathic practitioners fail to recognise this unofficial phenomenon.

History

Various forms of colon cleansing were popular in the 19th and early 20th century. In 1932, Bastedo wrote in the Journal of the American Medical Association about his observation of mucus masses being removed during a colon irrigation procedure: "When one sees the dirty gray, brown or blackish sheets, strings and rolled up wormlike masses of tough mucus with a rotten or dead-fish odor that are obtained by colon irrigations, one does not wonder that these patients feel ill and that they obtain relief and show improvement as the result of the irrigation."

While colonic irrigation enjoyed a vogue in the early 20th century as a possible cure for numerous diseases, subsequent research showed that it was useless and potentially harmful. With the scientific rationale for "colon cleansing" disproven, the idea fell into disrepute as a form of quackery, with a 2005 medical review stating that "there is no evidence to support this ill-conceived theory that has been long abandoned by the scientific community." Similarly, in response to claims that colon cleansing removes "toxins", Bennett Roth, a gastroenterologist at the University of California, stated that "there is absolutely no science to this whatsoever. There is no such thing as getting rid of quote-unquote 'toxins.' The colon was made to carry stool. This is total baloney." The preoccupation with such bowel management products has been described as a "quaint and amusing chapter in the history of weird medical beliefs." Nevertheless, interest in colonic "autointoxication" as a cause of illness, and in colonic irrigation as a cure, enjoyed a revival in alternative medicine at the end of the 20th century.

The term "mucoid plaque" was coined and popularized by naturopath and entrepreneur Richard Anderson, who sells a range of products that claim to cleanse the body of such purported plaques by causing them to be eliminated. Anderson describes a mucoid plaque as a rubbery, ropey, generally green gel-like mucus film that covers the epithelial cells of the hollow organs, particularly of the alimentary canal. Anderson also claims the plaque can impair digestion and the absorption of nutrients, hold pathogens, and cause illnesses such as diarrhea, bowel cancer, allergies and skin conditions. Based on these claims, he promotes efforts to remove the plaque, and sells a range of products to this end.

Though Anderson argues that his beliefs are backed by scientific research, his claims are primarily supported by anecdotal evidence rather than empirical data, and doctors have noted the absence of mucoid plaques. Anderson claims this is due to medical textbooks failing to cover the concept, which results in doctors not knowing what to look for.

Medical evaluation

Practicing physicians have dismissed the concept of mucoid plaque as a hoax and a "non-credible concept". A pathologist at the University of Texas School of Medicine addressed Anderson's claims directly, saying that he has "seen several thousand intestinal biopsies and have never seen any 'mucoid plaque.' This is a complete fabrication with no anatomic basis." Another pathologist, Edward Friedlander, noted that, in his experience, he has never observed anything resembling a "toxic bowel settlement", and that some online photographs actually depict what he recognises as a blood clot. Commenting on claims that waste material can adhere to the colon, Douglas Pleskow, a gastroenterologist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, stated, "that is the urban legend. In reality, most people clear their GI tract within three days."

In a review of websites promoting products that claim to remove 'mucoid rope' or plaque from consumers' intestines, Howard Hochster of New York University wrote that these websites are "abundant, quasi-scientific, and unfortunately convincing to a biologically uneducated public." He noted that although such sites are entertaining, they are disturbing in that they promote a belief that has no basis in physiology. Hochster also noted that a preparation marketed to remove mucoid plaque contains laxatives and bulky fibrous ingredients. Thus, the ropy residue expelled from people who consume this product "certainly is a result of the figs and senna in this preparation," rather than any sort of pathologic 'plaque'. Other 'colon cleanser' products contain bentonite clay that, when ingested, would also result in production of bulky stools.

In many cases, customers purchase products that are said to help the body excrete the so-called 'mucoid plaque'. The customer may consume a number of pills, and then within 12–48 hours, will produce a hollow intestine-shaped object after their subsequent bowel movement. This object is said to be the 'mucoid plaque'; however, analysis of the item consumed by the customer shows that the active ingredient is very similar to that of clumping feline litter, and takes a negative mould of the intestine which is shed and excreted during the customer's next bowel movement.

References

  1. Sullivan-Fowler M (July 1995). "Doubtful theories, drastic therapies: autointoxication and faddism in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries". J Hist Med Allied Sci. 50 (3): 364–90. doi:10.1093/jhmas/50.3.364. PMID 7665877.
  2. Bastedo WA (1932). "Colonic irrigations: their administration, therapeutic application and dangers". 98. JAMA: 736. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  3. ^ Ernst, E (June 1997). "Colonic irrigation and the theory of autointoxication: a triumph of ignorance over science". Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. 24 (4): 196–198. doi:10.1097/00004836-199706000-00002. PMID 9252839.
  4. Müller-Lissner SA, Kamm MA, Scarpignato C, Wald A (January 2005). "Myths and misconceptions about chronic constipation". Am. J. Gastroenterol. 100 (1): 232–42. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.40885.x. PMID 15654804. S2CID 8060335.
  5. ^ Foreman, Judy (June 30, 2008). "Beware of colon cleansing claims". Los Angeles Times.
  6. Grady, Denise (May 23, 2000). "Cult of the Colon: From Little Liver Pills to Big Obsessions". New York Times.
  7. ^ "Colon cleanses thrive despite scant proof". The Georgia Straight. Retrieved 2008-11-05.
  8. ^ Joe Schwarcz (April 5, 2008). "I have a gut feeling something's wrong here". Montreal Gazette. Archived from the original on June 3, 2012.
  9. Anderson, Richard (2000). Cleanse & Purify Thyself, Books One and Two. Christobe Publishing.
  10. Soergel, Dagobert; Tony Tse; Laura Slaughter (2004). "Helping Healthcare Consumers Understand: An "Interpretive Layer" for Finding and Making Sense of Medical Information" (PDF). MedInfo2004. 107 (Pt 2). IOS Press, Amsterdam: 931–5. PMID 15360949. Archived from the original on July 17, 2011. Retrieved 2012-08-31.
  11. Uthman, Edward (7 January 1998). "Mucoid Plaque". Quackwatch. Retrieved 2007-02-21.
  12. Friedlander, Ed. "Ed's Guide to Alternative Therapies: Colonics". Retrieved 2007-02-21.
  13. ^ Hochster H. (2007). ""Colon Health" Websites". Current Colorectal Cancer Reports. 2 (3): 105–106. doi:10.1007/s11888-006-0027-6. S2CID 195301831.
  14. "The Detoxification Myth".
Naturopathy
Practices
Naturopaths
Beliefs
Critics
Related
Pseudoscience
List of topics characterized as pseudoscience
Terminology
Topics
characterized as
pseudoscience
Medicine
Social science
Physics
Other
Promoters of
pseudoscience
Related topics
Resources
Categories:
Mucoid plaque: Difference between revisions Add topic