Revision as of 18:45, 13 March 2023 editPofka (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,563 editsm use dedicated talk pages for discussing contentTag: Manual revert← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:10, 13 March 2023 edit undoHJ Mitchell (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators122,032 edits →Marcelus: new sectionTag: New topicNext edit → | ||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
<span style="background-color: blue">] ]</span> 12:29, 13 March 2023 (UTC) | <span style="background-color: blue">] ]</span> 12:29, 13 March 2023 (UTC) | ||
== Marcelus == | |||
As you are no doubt aware, I am the admin who sanctioned Marcelus. I wish to clarify first that the sanction was explicitly for edit warring and not for any other conduct, and second that he is at liberty to edit the topic within the bounds of his restriction. There is no need for you to bring his sanction up in unrelated discussions. In fact doing so, and in particular, are suggestive of a ]. Marcelus has explicitly asked for no sanctions against you so I don't intend to take this any further but please focus more on content and less on contributors. Thank you, ] | ] 20:10, 13 March 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:10, 13 March 2023
This user has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian on 16 April 2022.A barnstar for you!
The Editor's Barnstar | |
Gotteswerder Castle is a very good article. Well done. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 16:35, 3 February 2023 (UTC) |
- @BoyTheKingCanDance: Thanks. -- Pofka (talk) 16:37, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Dovydas Giedraitis moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Dovydas Giedraitis, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG, neither does routine sports coverage.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Misplaced Pages). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Misplaced Pages's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 12:25, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Grammatica Litvanica
On 16 February 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Grammatica Litvanica, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Daniel Klein's Grammatica Litvanica (pictured), the first printed grammar of the Lithuanian language, introduced the distinctive Lithuanian letter Ė? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Grammatica Litvanica. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Grammatica Litvanica), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
my daily stories |
Thank you for an interesting DYK! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:15, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt: I am glad that you like it. Thank you for your kind words. :) -- Pofka (talk) 14:17, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- music today: the regional festival - DYK of 13 years ago ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:26, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- My story on 24 February is about Artemy Vedel (TFA by Amitchell235), and I made a suggestion for more peace, - what do you think? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:50, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt: Hi, it is an interesting information I was not familiar with before. Thanks. However, I have not participated in discussions about such infoboxes problematism, so I don't have strong opinion regarding this question. -- Pofka (talk) 17:04, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- understand, - lucky you! - today: two women whose birthday we celebrate today, 99 and 90! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:04, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt: Wow, just one year until 100. Impressive jubilee is approaching! -- Pofka (talk) 16:13, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- understand, - lucky you! - today: two women whose birthday we celebrate today, 99 and 90! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:04, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt: Hi, it is an interesting information I was not familiar with before. Thanks. However, I have not participated in discussions about such infoboxes problematism, so I don't have strong opinion regarding this question. -- Pofka (talk) 17:04, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Gediminas
Hello,
I've recently done some work editing Gediminas to make it more WP:NPOV (mostly getting rid of MOS:PUFFERY. In fact, I think the article may be sufficiently NPOV enough by now. If possible, can I remove the NPOV template from the article? If not, are there any additional edits I need to make to make the article more NPOV?
Below are the diffs of the revisions I made:
And here are the diffs of the subsequent revisions that occurred after I made the edits:
I decided to notify you as although I have already posted in Talk:Gediminas and Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Lithuania about this, as I haven't been getting responses to my questions. I want to reach a WP:CONSENSUS before I remove the NPOV dispute template on the article. I thought you might be a good person to reach out regarding this topic as you have far more editing experience than me (I only joined a week ago) and you seem familiar with the topic at hand judging from your contribs.
Shadow of the Starlit Sky (talk) 12:29, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Marcelus
As you are no doubt aware, I am the admin who sanctioned Marcelus. I wish to clarify first that the sanction was explicitly for edit warring and not for any other conduct, and second that he is at liberty to edit the topic within the bounds of his restriction. There is no need for you to bring his sanction up in unrelated discussions. In fact doing so, and this comment in particular, are suggestive of a battleground mentality. Marcelus has explicitly asked for no sanctions against you so I don't intend to take this any further but please focus more on content and less on contributors. Thank you, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:10, 13 March 2023 (UTC)