Misplaced Pages

User talk:Majash2020: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:52, 19 April 2023 editSs112 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers723,864 edits Please follow what Template:Music ratings says← Previous edit Revision as of 05:12, 20 April 2023 edit undoMajash2020 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers30,288 edits Please follow what Template:Music ratings says: ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit →
Line 299: Line 299:
Hello Majash2020. Per ], do not use ] for publications that do not award stars. Please do not make automated edits like where you remove the star rating for '']'', which gives a star rating out of 10, and add it for '']'', which does not give a star rating and states at the bottom "4/5" with no stars in sight. You are directly going against what the template recommends doing, so please stop making these sorts of automated replacement edits until you fix the problem. Please go back through your recent edits and undo where you've replaced proper ratings with star templates. Thank you. <b>]<small>]</small></b> 14:38, 19 April 2023 (UTC) Hello Majash2020. Per ], do not use ] for publications that do not award stars. Please do not make automated edits like where you remove the star rating for '']'', which gives a star rating out of 10, and add it for '']'', which does not give a star rating and states at the bottom "4/5" with no stars in sight. You are directly going against what the template recommends doing, so please stop making these sorts of automated replacement edits until you fix the problem. Please go back through your recent edits and undo where you've replaced proper ratings with star templates. Thank you. <b>]<small>]</small></b> 14:38, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
:Letting you know now, if you make any more of these automated replacement edits where you introduce the rating template for a site that doesn't use it or remove it where the website does, I will go to ] because this is already taxing to revert. <b>]<small>]</small></b> 14:51, 19 April 2023 (UTC) :Letting you know now, if you make any more of these automated replacement edits where you introduce the rating template for a site that doesn't use it or remove it where the website does, I will go to ] because this is already taxing to revert. <b>]<small>]</small></b> 14:51, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
:Hi Ss112, thanks for letting me know of this. I'll be removing the automated edits for the ratings and fixing my previous edits. Sorry for the inconvenience ] (]) 05:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:12, 20 April 2023

Archives
  1. User talk:Mjs1991/Archive 2
  2. User talk:Mjs1991/Archive 3
  3. User talk:Mjs1991/Archive 4
  4. User talk:Mjs1991/Archive 5
  5. User talk:Mjs1991/Archive 6
  6. User talk:Mjs1991/Archive 7
  7. User talk:Mjs1991/Archive 8
  8. User talk:Mjs1991/Archive 9
  9. User talk:Mjs1991/Archive 10
  10. User talk:Mjs1991/Archive 11
  11. User talk:Mjs1991/Archive 12
  12. User talk:Mjs1991/Archive 13
  13. User talk:Mjs1991/Archive 14
  14. User talk:Mjs1991/Archive 15
  15. User talk:Mjs1991/Archive 16
  16. User talk:Mjs1991/Archive 17
  17. User talk:Mjs1991/Archive 18
  18. User talk:Mjs1991/Archive 19
  19. User talk:Mjs1991/Archive 20
  20. User talk:Mjs1991/Archive 21
  21. User talk:Mjs1991/Archive 22
  22. User talk:Mjs1991/Archive 23
  23. User talk:Mjs1991/Archive 24
  24. User talk:Mjs1991/Archive 25
  25. User talk:Mjs1991/Archive 26
  26. User talk:Mjs1991/Archive 27
  27. User talk:Mjs1991/Archive 28
  28. User talk:Mjs1991/Archive 29
  29. User talk:Mjs1991/Archive 30
  30. User talk:Mjs1991/Archive 31
  31. User talk:Mjs1991/Archive 32
  32. User talk:Mjs1991/Archive 33
  33. User talk:Mjs1991/Archive 34

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.
Da best director has given you a fresh pie! Pies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a fresh pie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Bon appétit!

Thanks for the welcome chart! You will always be my sweet nectrine pie. Spread WikiLove (and mine too).

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation


Hello Majash2020! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.


You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

== Michael Mingay - User:Michael Mingay (talk) 2 June 2020

Hi there,

I am working on the Alice cooper album page Detroit Stories and was wondering what kind of information you had sourced on release and information surrounding the conception of the album, as I have found it particularly difficult to find information in this field. Any help is much appreciated, thanks

Michael Mingay.

Peter Cooper - Concert PianistRozarella (talk) 23:13, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi there,

I submitted the Peter Cooper article on behalf of my father who was a lose friend. He has asked me to send you the following:

There are numerous entries to Peter in Google they should look at. I ought to have mentioned that he is the author of a book entitled 'Style in Piano Playing' (ISBN 0 7145 3512 5) published by John Calder in 1975. That edition was in hardback and is out of print but the paperback is still available I believe. I don't have its ISBN but could get hold of it if Misplaced Pages insist. I have a few concert programmes and could supply photocopies as I am not keen to let them have originals and also a recording of a 60 minute radio programme on Peter's life and work transmitted by N.Z. Radio several years ago. Incidentally, it includes my dulcet tones!

I hope this helps.

Kind Regards

Ros Coward

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2013

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 6, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2013
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2013, the project has:


Content


Project Navigation To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

AFC Backlog Drive

Happy New Year Mjs1991!

Happy New Year! Mjs1991,
Have a prosperous, productive and wonderful New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Misplaced Pages.

Join the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!

[REDACTED]

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

  • Overall winner
    • 1st - $500
    • 2nd - $200
    • 3rd - $100
  • Diversity winner - $100
  • Gender-gap fillers - $100
  • Language Winners - up to $100*

We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Welcome to the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!

[REDACTED]

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project core team is happy to inform you that the Months of African Cinema Contest is happening again this year in October and November. We invite Wikipedians all over the world to join in improving content related to African cinema on Misplaced Pages!

Please list your username under the participants’ section of the contest page to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. The term "African" in the context of this contest, includes people of African descent from all over the world, which includes the diaspora and the Caribbean.

The following prizes would be recognized at the end of the contest:

  • Overall winner
    • 1st - $500
    • 2nd - $200
    • 3rd - $100
  • Diversity winner - $100
  • Gender-gap fillers - $100
  • Language Winners - up to $100*

Also look out for local prizes from affiliates in your countries or communities! For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. We look forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:20, 30th September 2021 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022

Hello Majash2020,

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

NPP backlog May – October 15, 2022

Suggestions:

  • There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
  • Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
  • Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
  • This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

Reminders
  • Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
  • If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
  • Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
  • If you are no longer very active on Misplaced Pages or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
  • To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023

Hello Majash2020,

New Page Review queue December 2022
Backlog

The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.

2022 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!

Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)

New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js

Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.

Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.

Reminders
  • Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
  • There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
  • Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
  • If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
  • To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Guild of Copy Editors March 2023 Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors March 2023 Newsletter


Hello and welcome to the March 2023 newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since December and our Annual Report for 2022. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. We extend a warm welcome to all of our new members, including those who have signed up for our current March Backlog Elimination Drive. We wish you all happy copy-editing.

Election results: In our December 2022 coordinator election, Reidgreg and Tenryuu stepped down as coordinators; we thank them for their service. Incumbents Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Zippybonzo were returned as coordinators until 1 July. For the second time, no lead coordinator was chosen. Nominations for our mid-year Election of Coordinators open on 1 June (UTC).

Drive: 21 editors signed up for our January Backlog Elimination Drive, 14 of whom claimed at least one copy-edit. Between them, they copy-edited 170 articles totaling 389,737 words. Barnstars awarded are here.

Blitz: Our February Copy Editing Blitz focused on October and November 2022 requests, and the March and April 2022 backlogs. Of the 14 editors who signed up, nine claimed at least one copy-edit; and between them, they copy-edited 39,150 words in 22 articles. Barnstars awarded are here.

Drive: Sign up now for our month-long March Backlog Elimination Drive. Barnstars awarded will be posted here after the drive closes.

Progress report: As of 12:08, 19 March 2023 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 73 requests since 1 January 2023, all but five of them from 2022, and the backlog stands at 1,872 articles.

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Zippybonzo.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Draft:2022 Memphis 901 FC season

Hey Majash2020, Thanks for your review and input on 2022 Memphis 901 FC season. I was wondering if I could get some clarification on what is "confusing" about the page as well as what contributed to the your "essay" comment. This is my first large submission with plans to do more - so I just want to create a perfect "template" for season reviews. I understand that the submission is more complex than 2021 Memphis 901 FC season, but I did that on purpose to make it a more informative season review. I used 2022 Orlando City SC season as a example to build the 2022 Memphis page after. You can see that it matches a lot of the detail in the Orlando City page in stats and player detail. Just wanted to let you know where the page setup came from to see if it helps.

Like I said, please let me know what I can do to the page to avoid confusion and the essay note.

Trevor O Tivo15 (talk) 13:50, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Bwana Kheri

Hello Majash2020. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Bwana Kheri, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: clearly claims significance. Generally speaking, people who are written about 100+ years after their death can be presumed sufficiently significant to pass A7. Thank you. SoWhy 08:33, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Draft: Peter Mark

Hi there Majash2020,

Thank you for reviewing a new submission on the opera conductor Peter Mark, I am a recent contributor to Misplaced Pages so thank you for bearing with me. Having created a new version with only the most factual and biographical of details, and that version being further rejected, I would value more targeted feedback on the offending sentences. With reference to your comment: Majority of the sources aren't independent sources about the topic, but are mostly passing mentions, I am interested in questioning this.

For example, there are several key biographical fact drawing from the Concise Oxford Dictionary of Music - certainly independent and something I've used in my academic work on Music history for reference.

Peter's contributions in terms of performances are a matter for public record and have linked to the performance archives of the BBC, Metropolitan Opera, Virginia Opera, with cross reference to the performance archive of the Publisher of the Music Works in question.

Regarding the reference to details in the programme notes of Music Scores, for the ease of reading of the reader's behalf, I have linked to their existence on the Publisher's website, but each of these live in the fully published copies that have ISBN nos. Would amending them to the books rather than the website satisfy any of your issue with the entry?

I concede that there are two biographical points I am still looking to find electronic reference two, those being his professorship at the University of California and the RNCM, both which I know to be factual.

Otherwise, i see no reason why the content of this submission any different from similar entries on other opera conductors including Martyn Brabbins or Edward Gardner (conductor).

Thank you in advance for your clarification.

Twlebrocq (talk) 14:59, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Draft: SMPTE ST 2067

Hi Majash2020,

Thanks for the second review on this draft. I've added several new references and citations in hopes the page will qualify for publication. As a newer contributor, is it permissible to ask for another re-review while this article is still fresh in your mind? If not, I can wait my turn again.

I will note that a closely related page I contributed, Interoperable Master Format (published), includes many of the same references and citations, and I hope this interconnection of topic pages can help get the 2067 draft across the finish line.

Any further suggestions to help qualify the article would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! Lord Myric (talk) 01:47, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Submission declined

Hello, I'm referring the article "Junaid akram" which you recently declined due to lack of significant coverage. ARE YOU COMPLETELY SURE THAT YOU CHECKED ALL THE REFERENCES BY YOURSELF? Because you need to re-evaluate the references provided. I added all the news references from the top news sources in Pakistan. Robertglan (talk) 08:36, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Please follow what Template:Music ratings says

Hello Majash2020. Per Template:Music ratings, do not use Template:Rating for publications that do not award stars. Please do not make automated edits like this where you remove the star rating for Gigwise, which gives a star rating out of 10, and add it for Kerrang!, which does not give a star rating and states at the bottom "4/5" with no stars in sight. You are directly going against what the template recommends doing, so please stop making these sorts of automated replacement edits until you fix the problem. Please go back through your recent edits and undo where you've replaced proper ratings with star templates. Thank you. Ss112 14:38, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Letting you know now, if you make any more of these automated replacement edits where you introduce the rating template for a site that doesn't use it or remove it where the website does, I will go to WP:AN because this is already taxing to revert. Ss112 14:51, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi Ss112, thanks for letting me know of this. I'll be removing the automated edits for the ratings and fixing my previous edits. Sorry for the inconvenience Majash2020 (talk) 05:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
User talk:Majash2020: Difference between revisions Add topic