| Revision as of 08:21, 27 May 2023 editPartyParrot42 (talk | contribs)110 edits →Personal Attacks: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:29, 27 May 2023 edit undoUnbiased6969 (talk | contribs)397 edits →Personal Attacks: ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| - ] (]) 08:21, 27 May 2023 (UTC) | - ] (]) 08:21, 27 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
| :Oh you sweet child. You don't know how to comprehend sentences. You think you had something, but you don't. | |||
| :"Something the study already proved, even though its widely known and you likely hold the same sentiment." | |||
| :The meaning of this statement is that the study proved that society today views pitbulls as a black person's dog. I am saying you likely hold the same sentiment as the study proived. | |||
| :Thinking a pitbull is a black persons dog is not racist? Unless you are saying you associate anything black to be bad? Weird. | |||
| :I own pits, I know they're perceived as a black dog. Its not a bad thing. Its not something there is shame in, and holding that sentiment isn't racism. Next you're going to say that associating Hip-hop with black culture is racist lmao. Isomorphic symbols are real and they exist. Pointing them out doesn't make someone racist. Using them to create action like, creating policy, or excluding dog breeds from areas, that's racist. Grasping at straws here badly. ] (]) 15:29, 27 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:29, 27 May 2023
Personal Attacks
Including this here because you said to. I'm tired with your WP:NOPA attacks, both on my talk page and the pit bull talk page. Once again, please stop.
On another user's page:
On my page:
- Accusations of intellectual dishonesty
- Baseless accusations of dishonesty, disruptive language
- Insulting language, accusations of racism PartyParrot42 (talk) 08:21, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oh you sweet child. You don't know how to comprehend sentences. You think you had something, but you don't.
- "Something the study already proved, even though its widely known and you likely hold the same sentiment."
- The meaning of this statement is that the study proved that society today views pitbulls as a black person's dog. I am saying you likely hold the same sentiment as the study proived.
- Thinking a pitbull is a black persons dog is not racist? Unless you are saying you associate anything black to be bad? Weird.
- I own pits, I know they're perceived as a black dog. Its not a bad thing. Its not something there is shame in, and holding that sentiment isn't racism. Next you're going to say that associating Hip-hop with black culture is racist lmao. Isomorphic symbols are real and they exist. Pointing them out doesn't make someone racist. Using them to create action like, creating policy, or excluding dog breeds from areas, that's racist. Grasping at straws here badly. Unbiased6969 (talk) 15:29, 27 May 2023 (UTC)