Revision as of 10:21, 30 June 2023 editRevelationDirect (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users175,106 edits →Irish trade unionists: lowering the temperature← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:47, 30 June 2023 edit undoBrownHairedGirl (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers2,942,733 edits →Irish trade unionists: ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit → | ||
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
*:In 17 years at CFD, I have never before seen anything remotely like this. ] <small>] • (])</small> 08:34, 30 June 2023 (UTC) | *:In 17 years at CFD, I have never before seen anything remotely like this. ] <small>] • (])</small> 08:34, 30 June 2023 (UTC) | ||
::: {{Ping|BrownHairedGirl}} This is a difference of opinion over the ] ''guideline''; it's not worth throwing out ] with the bath water. And I'm ''also'' trying to do better here; I struck a part of my comment in another nomination that was about you and not the category. (Sorry about that, btw.) Why don't we both lower the temperature? - ] (]) 10:20, 30 June 2023 (UTC) | ::: {{Ping|BrownHairedGirl}} This is a difference of opinion over the ] ''guideline''; it's not worth throwing out ] with the bath water. And I'm ''also'' trying to do better here; I struck a part of my comment in another nomination that was about you and not the category. (Sorry about that, btw.) Why don't we both lower the temperature? - ] (]) 10:20, 30 June 2023 (UTC) | ||
::::No it is not a {{tq|difference of opinion|q=y}}. There has been a systematic efforts by a tag team (in which Oculi is one of the two main players) to radically misrepresent ] and to use that misrepresented guideline vindictively. WP:SMALLCAT is unambiguously restricted (inter alia) to cats which are "Small with no potential for growth", and it is being systematically abused by editors (including you) who wholly ignore the "no potential for growth" part. | |||
::::The way to {{tq|lower the temperature|q=y}} is to stop tag-teaming, and to withdraw the vindictive nominations. I welcome your striking of one of your comments, but I note that on that page you have not even struck your bogus allegation in that discussion that I had {{tq|threatened|q=y}} the closer (an allegation which you also made elsewhere) or you appalling !vote to merge on the grounds that one editor would not commit to populating the nominated categories, or your false allegations of ] disruption. If you ''really'' want to {{tq|lower the temperature|q=y}} then stop pouring petrol on fires and stop enabling the tag team and stop being an attack dog for the tag team. ] <small>] • (])</small> 10:47, 30 June 2023 (UTC) | |||
==== Category:Pathological science ==== | ==== Category:Pathological science ==== |
Revision as of 10:47, 30 June 2023
< June 23 June 25 >June 24
Irish field hockey players
- Merge Category:Field hockey players from County Armagh (0) to Category:Sportspeople from County Armagh (14), Category:Irish field hockey players (30) and Category:Field hockey players from Northern Ireland (12)
- Merge Category:Field hockey players from County Clare (0) to Category:Sportspeople from County Clare (20) and Category:Irish field hockey players
- Merge Category:Field hockey players from County Donegal (0) to Category:Sportspeople from County Donegal (29) and Category:Irish field hockey players
- Merge Category:Field hockey players from County Galway (0) to Category:Sportspeople from County Galway (31) and Category:Irish field hockey players
- Merge Category:Field hockey players from County Kerry (0) to Category:Sportspeople from County Kerry (43) and Category:Irish field hockey players
- Merge Category:Field hockey players from County Kilkenny (0) to Category:Sportspeople from County Kilkenny (21) and Category:Irish field hockey players
- Merge Category:Field hockey players from County Limerick (0) to Category:Sportspeople from County Limerick (20) and Category:Irish field hockey players
- Merge Category:Field hockey players from County Londonderry (0) to Category:Sportspeople from County Londonderry (19) and Category:Irish field hockey players and Category:Field hockey players from Northern Ireland
- Merge Category:Field hockey players from County Louth (0) to Category:Sportspeople from County Louth (21) and Category:Irish field hockey players
- Merge Category:Field hockey players from County Tipperary (0) to Category:Sportspeople from County Tipperary (28) and Category:Irish field hockey players
- Merge Category:Field hockey players from County Tyrone (0) to Category:Sportspeople from County Tyrone (23) and Category:Irish field hockey players and Category:Field hockey players from Northern Ireland
- Merge Category:Field hockey players from County Waterford (0) to Category:Sportspeople from County Waterford (15) and Category:Irish field hockey players
- Merge Category:Field hockey players from County Wexford (0) to Category:Sportspeople from County Wexford (17) and Category:Irish field hockey players
- Merge Category:Field hockey players from County Wicklow (0) to Category:Sportspeople from County Wicklow (27) and Category:Irish field hockey players
- Rationale: There are 124 members in all in Category:Irish field hockey players and 32 counties, ie around 4 per county. Moreover County Dublin has 48 and County Antrim (Belfast) has 17, leaving around 60 to be distributed amongst 30 counties. Clearly that any attempt to split up Irish field hockey players much further by county is doomed (indeed not one other passes user:William Allen Simpson’s stated minimum requirement of 10, County Down leading the way with 8). In addition to the small numbers, Sheelagh Murnaghan, say, is being categorised as a hockey player when the only mention of hockey in her article relates to her student days. Bill Haughton was a hockey player but is again categorised by place of birth (unsourced), contrary to WP:COP-PLACE. (“Haughton played once for Ireland, a first-class match against Glamorgan on 23 May 1953. He was dismissed for a duck in both innings”) Editors populating these categories should take responsibility for their edits rather than relying on ‘Petscan assured me this would be fine’. Oculi (talk) 22:51, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Merge All for Now with no objection to recreating any that reach 5+ articles. It's hard to imagine a tree further from a "large overall accepted sub-categorization scheme" as envisioned in WP:SMALLCAT since fully half have just 1 article. (If it ever gets to the point where just a couple are small, then it would make sense navigationally to complete the set.) - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:50, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:42, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- Merge per nom, simply not enough eligible articles to be split systematically across so many subcats. Crowsus (talk) 17:06, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- 'No objection. That set ended up with a weird distribution: a big cluster in Dublin, then a v long thin tail. Other sets had one or the other, but not both. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:25, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Irish trade unionists
- Merge Category:Trade unionists from County Carlow (1) to Category:Activists from County Carlow (11) and Category:Irish trade unionists (21)
- Merge Category:Trade unionists from County Clare (1) to Category:Activists from County Clare (12) and Category:Irish trade unionists
- Merge Category:Trade unionists from County Kildare (1) to Category:Activists from County Kildare (2) and Category:Irish trade unionists
- Merge Category:Trade unionists from County Laois (1) to Category:Activists from County Laois (1) and Category:Irish trade unionists
- Merge Category:Trade unionists from County Mayo (1) to Category:Activists from County Mayo (2) and Category:Irish trade unionists
- Merge Category:Trade unionists from County Armagh (2) to Category:Activists from County Armagh (2) and Category:Irish trade unionists and Category:Trade unionists from Northern Ireland (3)
- Merge Category:Trade unionists from County Monaghan (2) to Category:Activists from County Monaghan (1) and Category:Irish trade unionists
- Merge Category:Trade unionists from County Roscommon (2) to Category:Activists from County Roscommon (1) and Category:Irish trade unionists
- Merge Category:Trade unionists from County Tyrone (2) to Category:Activists from County Tyrone (2) and Category:Irish trade unionists and Category:Trade unionists from Northern Ireland
- Merge Category:Trade unionists from County Londonderry (3) to Category:Activists from County Londonderry (2) and Category:Irish trade unionists and Category:Trade unionists from Northern Ireland
- Merge Category:Trade unionists from County Waterford (3) to Category:Activists from County Waterford (1) and Category:Irish trade unionists
- Merge Category:Trade unionists from County Wexford (3) to Category:Activists from County Wexford (1) and Category:Irish trade unionists
- Merge Category:Trade unionists from County Wicklow (3) to Category:Activists from County Wicklow (16) and Category:Irish trade unionists
- Merge Category:Trade unionists from County Down (4) to Category:Activists from County Down (3) and Category:Irish trade unionists and Category:Trade unionists from Northern Ireland
- Merge Category:Trade unionists from County Kerry (4) to Category:Activists from County Kerry (2) and Category:Irish trade unionists
- Merge Category:Trade unionists from County Limerick (5) to Category:Activists from County Limerick (1) and Category:Irish trade unionists
- Merge Category:Trade unionists from County Meath (4) to Category:Activists from County Meath (1) and Category:Irish trade unionists
- Merge Category:Trade unionists from County Sligo (4) to Category:Activists from County Sligo (1) and Category:Irish trade unionists
- Merge Category:Trade unionists from County Tipperary (5) to Category:Activists from County Tipperary (1) and Category:Irish trade unionists
- Rationale: There are 218 members in all in Category:Irish trade unionists and 32 counties, ie around 7 per county. Moreover County Dublin has 74, County Antrim (Belfast) has 36 and County Cork has 22, leaving around 66 to be distributed amongst 29 counties. Clearly any attempt to split up trade unionists much further by county is doomed (indeed not one other passes user:William Allen Simpson’s stated minimum requirement of 10, Galway leading the way with 9). In addition to the small numbers, Patricia Ryan (politician), say, is being categorised by place of birth (unsourced), contrary to WP:COP-PLACE. Indeed most of the articles if properly scrutinised do not support the addition of the 'by county' category at all. Oculi (talk) 21:44, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Merge All for Now with no objection to recreating any that reach 5+ articles for people who were labor unionists in that county. (While WP:SMALLCAT does not give a number, 5 articles has been a more common rule of thumb in CFD than 10.) - RevelationDirect (talk) 01:01, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:43, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose for now. This category series is only 9 days old. Ten of the 19 nominated categories have either 3 or 4 pages, meaning that only one more would be needed to reach 5. There is much uncaegorisation of Irish trade unionists, so I expect many more articles to be added to the set in coming weeks and months. Furthermore, I have not yet populated the activist-by-county categories, which will be much bigger, and it will be unhelpful to lose the TU ppl in those larger sets.
Please note that the nominator Oculi has been reminded many times recently that WP:SMALLCAT is for categories which are "Small with no potential for growth", and tat as with many other nominations by Oculi, he makes no attempt to assess the potential for growth, beyond noting the current ally of articles in in Category:Irish trade unionists. There is no consideration of undercategorisation of TU ppl, or of the rate of new articles. This is yet another blatantly bad faith nomination by a highly-experienced editor w persistently refuses to apply te actual guideline WP:SUBCAT, and who is par of a tag team overtly targeting my work i revenge for my opposing some of his nominations. I would be open to a review of these categories, but this is wildly premature.--BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:50, 29 June 2023 (UTC) - Request Please let's focus on the categories rather than other editors, flawed though they may be. - RevelationDirect (talk) 05:03, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- @RevelationDirect: when editors tag-team to abuse the CFD process by systematically misrepresenting guidelines and vindictively targeting the work of other editors, then it is important that this info is presented to the CFD discussion.
- In 17 years at CFD, I have never before seen anything remotely like this. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 08:34, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- @BrownHairedGirl: This is a difference of opinion over the WP:SMALLCAT guideline; it's not worth throwing out WP:5P4 with the bath water. And I'm also trying to do better here; I struck a part of my comment in another nomination that was about you and not the category. (Sorry about that, btw.) Why don't we both lower the temperature? - RevelationDirect (talk) 10:20, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- No it is not a
difference of opinion
. There has been a systematic efforts by a tag team (in which Oculi is one of the two main players) to radically misrepresent WP:SMALLCAT and to use that misrepresented guideline vindictively. WP:SMALLCAT is unambiguously restricted (inter alia) to cats which are "Small with no potential for growth", and it is being systematically abused by editors (including you) who wholly ignore the "no potential for growth" part. - The way to
lower the temperature
is to stop tag-teaming, and to withdraw the vindictive nominations. I welcome your striking of one of your comments, but I note that on that page you have not even struck your bogus allegation in that discussion that I hadthreatened
the closer (an allegation which you also made elsewhere) or you appalling !vote to merge on the grounds that one editor would not commit to populating the nominated categories, or your false allegations of WP:POINT disruption. If you really want tolower the temperature
then stop pouring petrol on fires and stop enabling the tag team and stop being an attack dog for the tag team. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:47, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- No it is not a
- @BrownHairedGirl: This is a difference of opinion over the WP:SMALLCAT guideline; it's not worth throwing out WP:5P4 with the bath water. And I'm also trying to do better here; I struck a part of my comment in another nomination that was about you and not the category. (Sorry about that, btw.) Why don't we both lower the temperature? - RevelationDirect (talk) 10:20, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Category:Pathological science
- Propose merging Category:Pathological science to Category:Pseudoscience
- Nominator's rationale: WP:TRIVIALCAT, WP:SUBJECTIVECAT, basically just means "particularly annoying pseudoscience" - car chasm (talk) 03:02, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment, pathological science seems to be a particular type of pseudoscience. It is not a very defining term though. But I am also not sure if the articles of this category really belong in pseudoscience. Category:Types of scientific fallacy, seems a better merge target, provided that this category is kept, maybe under another name. Marcocapelle (talk) 03:45, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Move to subcategory of Category:Types of scientific fallacy. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:21, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Anachronist: That target category has been nominated for deletion. (No opinion on that outcome.) - RevelationDirect (talk) 01:14, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Too subjective. - RevelationDirect (talk) 01:13, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CLYDE /STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 21:22, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
- Listify. It has a main category called pathological science, so in theory it should be okay. I certainly don't think it's trivial, it can be really dangerous. But as a term, "pathological science" may be somewhat subjective or arbitrary as a classification, also vis-à-vis pseudoscience as said (where does one end and the other begin?). Listify allows us to support each classification with RS. Categorisation does not give us that option. The main article is already full of cited examples, so that seems a logical way to go. If anyone doubts whether calling Foo a pathological science is valid, we can support it with an RS. If we can't, the item Foo can be removed from the list. Seems the best option to me. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 23:08, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, I think this is a good idea in addition to a merge. The nomination reasons are WP:OC-specific policy reasons, not value judgements on the concept itself. Plenty of things can be verifiable and notable but still WP:OC, pathological is certainly peripheral to "pseudoscience" or "discredited" and the fact that we can verify that a WP:RS called it pathological doesn't make their assessment "non-subjective" in the WP:SUBJECTIVECAT sense. - car chasm (talk) 04:13, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah,I guess Listify & Merge is the best option then. Both. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 21:36, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, I think this is a good idea in addition to a merge. The nomination reasons are WP:OC-specific policy reasons, not value judgements on the concept itself. Plenty of things can be verifiable and notable but still WP:OC, pathological is certainly peripheral to "pseudoscience" or "discredited" and the fact that we can verify that a WP:RS called it pathological doesn't make their assessment "non-subjective" in the WP:SUBJECTIVECAT sense. - car chasm (talk) 04:13, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
- See parallel discussion at Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_May_21#Category:Types_of_scientific_fallacy, the discussion now tends to manual split.
I suppose the two nominations should be closed likewise.Marcocapelle (talk) 05:37, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
- The latter may no longer apply as the other discussion tends to deletion. Maybe there is something to salvage here. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:51, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 21:42, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose listifying: the examples that are called pathological science are already in the article and any other examples should not be added to the article because that would be entirely arbitrary. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:35, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
Category:Exploration video games
- Propose renaming Category:Exploration video games to Category:Walking sims
- Nominator's rationale: I am putting this up for a CfD because I know the name can be a touchy topic. However, per the walking simulator article, reliable sources continue to use "walking sim" as the WP:COMMONNAME, therefore I believe this category should be retitled accordingly to match the article. I think it's sufficiently explained that despite its negative origins, it is now seen with ambivalence or support by numerous developers of such games, as shown in Kill Screen. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:05, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Support The industry has secured "walking sim" as a non-derogatory term for these games, compared to when games like Firewatch and Gone Home first came out. Masem (t) 01:08, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- Why not "Walking simulators" to match the parent article? Axem Titanium (talk) 04:10, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- I thought it would be a bit more concise in a list of categories, but if people think it should be a precise match I have no real issue with it. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:20, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- I think there's a strong preference for exact matching. No reason for not including a category redirect of Walking Sims to the full name. Masem (t) 00:26, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
- I thought it would be a bit more concise in a list of categories, but if people think it should be a precise match I have no real issue with it. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:20, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
Category:Lithuanian emigration
- Propose merging Category:Lithuanian emigration to Category:Lithuanian diaspora
- Nominator's rationale: The contents are not about emigration per se as the communities in which they find themselves. Laurel Lodged (talk) 19:20, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Many articles may be moved from Category:American emigration to Category:American diaspora for the same reason. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:47, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
Category:Lists of schools in Nagaland
- Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT. This category has only 1 entry. Estopedist1 (talk) 19:03, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Merging is not needed, the article is adequately categorized already. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:53, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
Category:International Association of Engineers
- Propose merging Category:International Association of Engineers to Category:Engineering societies
- Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT. This category has only 1 entry. Estopedist1 (talk) 18:13, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Dual merge also to Category:International professional associations. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:56, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
Old userspace drafts
- Propose merging Category:Userspace drafts from September 2005 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:Userspace drafts from before 2007
- Propose merging Category:Userspace drafts from January 2006 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:Userspace drafts from before 2007
- Propose merging Category:Userspace drafts from October 2006 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:Userspace drafts from before 2007
- Propose merging Category:Userspace drafts from November 2006 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:Userspace drafts from before 2007
- Propose merging Category:Userspace drafts from January 2007 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:Userspace drafts from 2007
- Propose merging Category:Userspace drafts from February 2007 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:Userspace drafts from 2007
- Propose merging Category:Userspace drafts from March 2007 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:Userspace drafts from 2007
- Propose merging Category:Userspace drafts from May 2007 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:Userspace drafts from 2007
- Propose merging Category:Userspace drafts from June 2007 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:Userspace drafts from 2007
- Propose merging Category:Userspace drafts from August 2007 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:Userspace drafts from 2007
- Propose merging Category:Userspace drafts from September 2007 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:Userspace drafts from 2007
- Propose merging Category:Userspace drafts from October 2007 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:Userspace drafts from 2007
- Propose merging Category:Userspace drafts from November 2007 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:Userspace drafts from 2007
- Propose merging Category:Userspace drafts from December 2007 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:Userspace drafts from 2007
- Nominator's rationale WP:SMALLCATs with between one and three members each and no clear potential for growth. The subcategorization of Category:Userspace drafts is best thought of not as a standard dated maintenance category (and thus a well-established scheme exempt from SMALLCAT deletions), but instead as subcategorization for size management since, unlike dated maintenance categories, a draft's presence in this tree is not requesting any specific action. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:03, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Agree - merge as suggested above. Months are far to small a time frame. --Bduke (talk) 02:40, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom, or keep 2005 and 2006 split as two year categories. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:58, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- The 2005 category would contain only one page, so that seems itself pointless, and I don't want to have to deal with this again if someone dredges up an untagged userspace draft from 2004. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:45, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
Category:Teach For America alumni
- Nominator's rationale: Per WP:NONDEF. Teach for America is a short-term teaching program and not defining for these people, most of whom are politicians and lawyers. It is similar to AmeriCorps VISTA, which was deleted in 2020 and Peace Corps volunteers, which was deleted in April. User:Namiba 17:10, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:PERFCAT and WP:NOT. Most of these articles are about people who are no longer educators who brandish this early work experience to show what a great person they are. And maybe they are great people! But this is Misplaced Pages not LinkedIn. - RevelationDirect (talk) 17:22, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Category:Telecom Italia
- Propose renaming Category:Telecom Italia to Category:TIM Group
- Nominator's rationale: New company name; as the name of the related page: TIM Group. Epicamused (talk) 15:51, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Rename per WP:C2D. This could have been listed at speedy. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:45, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy (leaving Redirect) The main article was renamed with a formal RM so the category should match. - RevelationDirect (talk) 17:25, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Rename. Azuredivay (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Category:Lords of Worb
- Propose merging Category:Lords of Worb to Category:Swiss nobility and Category:People from Worb
- Nominator's rationale: merge per WP:SMALLCAT, only one article. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:39, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Merge both because of the small size per nom and because it doesn't seem defining to the 1 article. - RevelationDirect (talk) 17:28, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
People educated by school in GB
- Rationale: all of the above categories have 1 article at the time of listing. Previous cfds (often nominated by user:Bearcat) have deleted high school alumni categories on WP:SMALLCAT grounds, such as this cfd. In contrast this more recent cfd has stimulated editors to populate most of them, an excellent outcome. A search such as this for Fernhill might find potential additions. When adding an article for an alumnus, the school should be mentioned in the article, preferably sourced. In some cases the school article, linked in the table above, will have a list of illustrious alumni. (The nominator has no obligation to make any attempt to populate any categories created by others. That responsibility lies entirely with the creator of a category, whose first edits post-creation should be to find members, and delete the wretched thing if no more can be found.) Oculi (talk) 12:39, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete if not populated, per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:41, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Support I'm not even going to read this. I'm supporting because I just love the table. Laurel Lodged (talk) 13:34, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete All for Now with no objection to recreation if any reach 5+ articles so they aid navigation. Also, the onus is on the category creator to initially populate their creations. - RevelationDirect (talk) 17:52, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete all, either insufficient for a category or no effort made by creator or others to find enough to make valid, none are new. Crowsus (talk) 17:02, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Irish police officers by county
- Propose upmerging Category:Police officers from County Fermanagh to Category:Irish police officers and merge to Category:People from County Fermanagh
- Propose upmerging Category:Police officers from County Kildare to Category:Irish police officers and merge to Category:People from County Kildare
- Propose upmerging Category:Police officers from County Laois to Category:Irish police officers and merge to Category:People from County Laois
- Propose upmerging Category:Police officers from County Leitrim to Category:Irish police officers and merge to Category:People from County Leitrim
- Propose upmerging Category:Police officers from County Louth to Category:Irish police officers and merge to Category:People from County Louth
- Propose upmerging Category:Police officers from County Meath to Category:Irish police officers and merge to Category:People from County Meath
- Propose upmerging Category:Police officers from County Offaly to Category:Irish police officers and merge to Category:People from County Offaly
- Propose upmerging Category:Police officers from County Waterford to Category:Irish police officers and merge to Category:People from County Waterford
- Propose upmerging Category:Police officers from County Westmeath to Category:Irish police officers and merge to Category:People from County Westmeath
- Propose upmerging Category:Police officers from County Wexford to Category:Irish police officers and merge to Category:People from County Wexford
- Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SmallCat since each of these has less than 4 members. Some are possibly mis-labelled. For example there is only one member each for counties Laois and Offaly: each member died before the creation of the current state so they would not have known their counties by those names; they would have used "Queens's County" and "King's County" respectively. Similarly, the occupants of the Tipperary category were born before the current anschluss; the county names in those days were North Tipperary and South Tipperary. The scope of the remaining categories would also benefit from a note to say that the scope is for people who were born in those counties; like John Cullen (police officer), they may not have served their police careers in their county of birth. Laurel Lodged (talk) 11:29, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Ireland has been notified of this discussion.
- Keep per WP:SMALLCAT, as part of an established series which is still being populated.
- The objection on the basis of the names of the counties is beyond absurd. These categories have no timeframe, and we always name categories by the most recent name. f we were to purge Laos an Offaly categories of articles from before 1922, we'd devastate the categories.
- As to North Tipperary and South Tipperary, that is nonsense. All the categories for North Tipperary and South Tipperary were merged to County Tipperary. There is reason to make police an eception. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:04, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Comment The only rationale offered is WP:SmallCat. The other obiter dicta is offered as a curious by-the-way. Regarding "we always name categories by the most recent name", why was that not applied in the case of Walter Edgeworth-Johnstone who was born, not in County Dublin (which is currently abolished as you know), but in the county of Dún Laoghaire–Rathdown? Laurel Lodged (talk) 12:15, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Laurel Lodged: Go READ WP:SMALLCAT. You don't even need to read the whole paragraph: Its headline is Small with no no potential for growth.
- Do you understand what no potential for growth means?
- You clearly did not do any WP:BEFORE. In the last hour, I added 100 articles to the 31 subcats of Category:Irish police officers by county. If you had made any attempt to examine the possibility of expansion, you would have bee, aware that these categories have potential for growth.
- Category:Irish police officers by county has 31 subcats (30 counties + the city of Belfast). Between them they now contain 278 articles, which is an average of 8.96 articles per category. That is a healthy size, and there is till room for growth.
- Of course, the distribution is not even, but WP:SMALLCAT has always allowed small categories as part of a series, which this is.
- The whole nomination is at best a act of unintended disruption caused by a failure to do WP:BEFORE. However, I find it very hard to believe that after all your years at CFD you are not aware that WP:SMALLCAT is for categories with "no potential for growth", or that it does not apply to established series.
- Please end the disruption by promptly withdrawing this nomination. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:27, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks I would like to offer my thanks to BHG for acknowledging that it was "unintended disruption". It's nice when she assumes that I work in Good Faith. Oh wait...did I just admit to being disruptive. Darn. Sigh. Laurel Lodged (talk) 13:32, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- I assume good faith until the assumption becomes untenable, as it has here.
- But of course it is wholly untrue to say that I was
acknowledging that it was "unintended disruption"
. I said that it is "at best a act of unintended disruption". - Please stop abusing CFD as a platform to publish untruths as part of your taunting games. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:52, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note that as a demonstration of LL's bad faith, LL made no response to the expansion of the categories, or to my comments about how WP:SMALLCAT supports keeping these categories. Instead, they just posted snark.
- A good faith editor would at this stage withdraw the nomination, and apologise both the failure to read WP:SMALLCAT and for their lack of WP:BEFORE, BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:05, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks I would like to offer my thanks to BHG for acknowledging that it was "unintended disruption". It's nice when she assumes that I work in Good Faith. Oh wait...did I just admit to being disruptive. Darn. Sigh. Laurel Lodged (talk) 13:32, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Comment The only rationale offered is WP:SmallCat. The other obiter dicta is offered as a curious by-the-way. Regarding "we always name categories by the most recent name", why was that not applied in the case of Walter Edgeworth-Johnstone who was born, not in County Dublin (which is currently abolished as you know), but in the county of Dún Laoghaire–Rathdown? Laurel Lodged (talk) 12:15, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- If merged, also merge to a "people from county" category. It escapes me what the encyclopedic value of grouping police officers (or any other occupation) by place of birth is. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:59, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks Marco. Good suggestion. I've amended the noms accordingly. Laurel Lodged (talk) 13:29, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Marcocapelle: I agree about the by-county targets, However, any merging should bed one manually, because many of these articles are already in subcats of Category:Irish police officers or in subcats of the relevant "people from county Foo".
- Tho of course per WP:SMALLCAT, no merge should happen.
- As to occupation by place, the Irish categories for "people from County Foo" were unusably big until I started diffusing them 6 weeks ago. Category:People from County Galway had over 900 articles, and Category:People from County Cork had over 800. They were a jumble of wildly different articles, from medieval scribes to Youtubers to Jacobite soldiers to 6th century Abbots.
- I am diffusing them by place and also by occupation ideally both, but rarely by the intersection of town/village and occupation. This diffusion creates more coherent groups of more manageable size which make it easier to find articles. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:45, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Diffusing by place makes sense, by occupation not so much. If they are diffused solely because they are too big then one diffusion criterion should suffice. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:44, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- That's not the only reason. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:51, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Diffusing by place makes sense, by occupation not so much. If they are diffused solely because they are too big then one diffusion criterion should suffice. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:44, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Merge - this is not part of "large overall accepted sub-categorization scheme" being neither large nor accepted; cfd is the place to challenge whether something is 'accepted'. In any case it suffers from WP:NARROWCAT: there is no connection between 'from county' and 'occupation'. This was discussed at length in Architects from Dorset, suggested by user:Johnbod, which was upmerged, nothing to do with smallcat. (It was one of the first appearances of user:Rathfelder's doppelganger user:Bigwig7.) Oculi (talk) 13:55, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Colm Browne's membership of this category is unsourced. Adding unsourced categories is frowned upon. George Kingsmill left Ireland for Canada aged 21 having been in the army; this is categorisation by place of birth, which is discouraged (see WP:COP-PLACE: "The place of birth, although it may be significant from the perspective of local studies, is rarely defining from the perspective of an individual.") So neither of the members of Category:Police officers from County Laois is legitimate, and the category is founded on wishful thinking. Oculi (talk) 14:14, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Sadly, many articles are poorly-sourced. Feel free to add {{fact}} tags, missing refs etc. If the assertion is removed, the category should be remove too.
- WP:COP-PLACE applies only to place of birth, so if someone is born in Derry but raised in Kerry, they should not be be categorised as from Derry. But where the article offers only place of birth, with no assertion of being raised elsewhere, then it is reasonable to assume that they were raised in that place. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:04, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Oculi: if you really believe that there is here is no connection between 'from county' and 'occupation', then nominate all the occupational subcats of Category:People by first-level administrative country subdivision, Category:People by city and occupation so that the principle can be consistently.
- OTOH, if your objection is to subcatting police by county, then at least add the whole of Category:Irish police officers by county.
- But note that WP:NARROWCAT does not apply here. "Similar intersections can be made for related categories" applies here. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:16, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Category:Police officers from County Offaly is the same: none of the 4 is notable as a police person in Ireland (the first 3 are sportspeople in Ireland) and none is sourced apart from the last. This appears to be a desperate attempt to avoid grey-links in the elegant by-county template (Category:AllIrelandByCountyCatNav with over 5 grey links) that adorns these unsupported categories. (This is not my nom. I have added nothing; besides one wishes to avoid a 'huge nom'.) I might well consider a nom similar to this, possibly quite soon, based on grey links; most helpful. Oculi (talk) 14:57, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Oculi, The decision to categorise as cops was not mine; I merely added the by-county cat.. All those I added today were already categorised (not by me) in Category:Garda Síochána officers, and I used a Petscan search to find those not in ay-county cat.
- Calling this a
a desperate attempt to avoid grey-links
is an unfounded assumption of bad faith. It follows a series if unpleasant and/or hostile encounters with you since I challenged your huge nominations in which you offered no evidence of having done any WP:BEFORE, and where you ignored my calls for it to be provided. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:14, 24 June 2023 (UTC)- It's also important to note that the intersection between police and Gaelic games is a notable hot potato: see Rule 21. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:24, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Category:Police officers from County Offaly is the same: none of the 4 is notable as a police person in Ireland (the first 3 are sportspeople in Ireland) and none is sourced apart from the last. This appears to be a desperate attempt to avoid grey-links in the elegant by-county template (Category:AllIrelandByCountyCatNav with over 5 grey links) that adorns these unsupported categories. (This is not my nom. I have added nothing; besides one wishes to avoid a 'huge nom'.) I might well consider a nom similar to this, possibly quite soon, based on grey links; most helpful. Oculi (talk) 14:57, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Colm Browne's membership of this category is unsourced. Adding unsourced categories is frowned upon. George Kingsmill left Ireland for Canada aged 21 having been in the army; this is categorisation by place of birth, which is discouraged (see WP:COP-PLACE: "The place of birth, although it may be significant from the perspective of local studies, is rarely defining from the perspective of an individual.") So neither of the members of Category:Police officers from County Laois is legitimate, and the category is founded on wishful thinking. Oculi (talk) 14:14, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Merge Most for Now with no objection to recreating later if they reach 5+ articles. (Meath & Kildare appear to have reached that threshold during this nomination.) The "large overall accepted sub-categorization scheme" doesn't apply here since so many of the cats are under-populated, although we might eventually reach a tipping point where 1 or 2 cats are small so it makes sense to complete the set to aid navigation. Some of the comments (pro and con) above seem pretty pointed which must be because of issues beyond this nomination, which is pretty mundane. - RevelationDirect (talk) 18:00, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Having Second Thoughts "Diffusing by place makes sense, by occupation not so much". I'm beginning to regret that I did not nominate the entire "by county" tree. Laurel Lodged (talk) 19:23, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Laurel Lodged: Okay, does that mean you're withdrawing this nomination, or just anticipating future ones? - RevelationDirect (talk) 01:42, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- just anticipating future ones Laurel Lodged (talk) 14:55, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Laurel Lodged: Okay, does that mean you're withdrawing this nomination, or just anticipating future ones? - RevelationDirect (talk) 01:42, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
Category:History of political thought journals
- Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT. This category has only 1 entry. Estopedist1 (talk) 10:52, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:48, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Category:Irish astrophysicists
- Populate or merge Category:Irish astrophysicists (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) (6 P, live count) to Category:Irish physicists (57) and Category:Irish astronomers (12) and Category:Astrophysicists
- Nominator's rationale: 1 article (10:43, 24 June 2023). An editor who creates a category has a duty to populate it if possible before moving on to other matters. A category consisting of one article is useless and gives the impression in this case that the Irish are not gifted Astrophysicists. I could populate the category quite easily (eg this elementary google search) but would rather spend my time trying to encourage editors to complete their self-allotted tasks properly. Note also that Astrophysicists are not explicitly gathered together by continent; a sad omission which someone contributing to this category tree might care to address. Oculi (talk) 10:43, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Merge if not populated also to Category:Astrophysicists, per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:49, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Good point. Amended. Oculi (talk) 22:53, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- Merge for Now with no objection to recreating later if 5+ articles are included, per WP:SMALLCAT and WP:CFDSCOPE. - RevelationDirect (talk) 17:50, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Merge as suggested above. --Bduke (talk) 02:36, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
Imperial Chinese government officials by province
- Propose merging Category:Qing dynasty politicians by province to Category:Qing dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Qing dynasty politicians from Anhui to Category:Qing dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Qing dynasty politicians from Beijing to Category:Qing dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Qing dynasty politicians from Chongqing to Category:Qing dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Qing dynasty politicians from Fujian to Category:Qing dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Qing dynasty politicians from Gansu to Category:Qing dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Qing dynasty politicians from Guangdong to Category:Qing dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Qing dynasty politicians from Guangxi to Category:Qing dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Qing dynasty politicians from Guizhou to Category:Qing dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Qing dynasty politicians from Hebei to Category:Qing dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Qing dynasty politicians from Heilongjiang to Category:Qing dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Qing dynasty politicians from Henan to Category:Qing dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Qing dynasty politicians from Hubei to Category:Qing dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Qing dynasty politicians from Hunan to Category:Qing dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Qing dynasty politicians from Jiangsu to Category:Qing dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Qing dynasty politicians from Jiangxi to Category:Qing dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Qing dynasty politicians from Jilin to Category:Qing dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Qing dynasty politicians from Liaoning to Category:Qing dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Qing dynasty politicians from Shandong to Category:Qing dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Qing dynasty politicians from Shanghai to Category:Qing dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Qing dynasty politicians from Shanxi to Category:Qing dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Qing dynasty politicians from Sichuan to Category:Qing dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Qing dynasty politicians from Xinjiang to Category:Qing dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Qing dynasty politicians from Yunnan to Category:Qing dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Qing dynasty politicians from Zhejiang to Category:Qing dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Song dynasty politicians from Anhui to Category:Song dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Song dynasty politicians from Fujian to Category:Song dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Song dynasty politicians from Guangdong to Category:Song dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Song dynasty politicians from Hebei to Category:Song dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Song dynasty politicians from Henan to Category:Song dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Song dynasty politicians from Hubei to Category:Song dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Song dynasty politicians from Jiangsu to Category:Song dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Song dynasty politicians from Jiangxi to Category:Song dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Song dynasty politicians from Shaanxi to Category:Song dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Song dynasty politicians from Shandong to Category:Song dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Song dynasty politicians from Shanghai to Category:Song dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Song dynasty politicians from Shanxi to Category:Song dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Song dynasty politicians from Sichuan to Category:Song dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Song dynasty politicians from Tianjin to Category:Song dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Song dynasty politicians from Zhejiang to Category:Song dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Tang dynasty politicians from Anhui to Category:Tang dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Tang dynasty politicians from Beijing to Category:Tang dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Tang dynasty politicians from Fujian to Category:Tang dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Tang dynasty politicians from Gansu to Category:Tang dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Tang dynasty politicians from Guangdong to Category:Tang dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Tang dynasty politicians from Hebei to Category:Tang dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Tang dynasty politicians from Henan to Category:Tang dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Tang dynasty politicians from Hubei to Category:Tang dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Tang dynasty politicians from Hunan to Category:Tang dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Tang dynasty politicians from Inner Mongolia to Category:Tang dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Tang dynasty politicians from Jiangsu to Category:Tang dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Tang dynasty politicians from Jiangxi to Category:Tang dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Tang dynasty politicians from Jilin to Category:Tang dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Tang dynasty politicians from Liaoning to Category:Tang dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Tang dynasty politicians from Ningxia to Category:Tang dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Tang dynasty politicians from Shaanxi to Category:Tang dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Tang dynasty politicians from Shandong to Category:Tang dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Tang dynasty politicians from Shanxi to Category:Tang dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Tang dynasty politicians from Sichuan to Category:Tang dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Tang dynasty politicians from Xinjiang to Category:Tang dynasty government officials
- Propose merging Category:Tang dynasty politicians from Zhejiang to Category:Tang dynasty government officials
- Nominator's rationale: merge per WP:OCLOCATION, trivial intersection between occupation and province where people grew up. A second merge target is not needed because articles are already categorized by city or county within every province. If these categories are not merged, then at least rename "politicians" to "government officials" per precedent 1 and 2. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:53, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Neutral/Rename if Kept I'll defer to others if these aid navigation but, if kept, they should be renamed to better reflect the contents. - RevelationDirect (talk) 18:06, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Kings of Syria
- Propose merging Category:1st-century BC kings of Syria (1 C, 1 P) to Category:Kings of Syria and Category:1st-century BC monarchs in the Middle East
- Propose merging Category:2nd-century BC kings of Syria (1 C) to Category:Kings of Syria and Category:2nd-century BC monarchs in the Middle East
- Propose merging Category:20th-century kings of Syria (1 P) to Category:Kings of Syria and
Category:20th-century monarchs in AsiaCategory:20th-century monarchs in the Middle East
- Nominator's rationale: merge redundant category layer as we already have categories of Seleucid kings by century. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:14, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Curious as to why Category:20th-century monarchs in the Middle East does not exist. Laurel Lodged (talk) 12:00, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, that is odd. I created the category now. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:09, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Category:Barons of Bernberg
- Propose merging Category:Barons of Bernberg to Category:Nobility in North America
- Nominator's rationale: merge, the category only contains one article, about a landgrave in North Carolina. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:30, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Merge That one article is also the only member of Category:Lords of Worb. - RevelationDirect (talk) 12:26, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Category:Gates in the United Arab Emirates
- Nominator's rationale: Only contains one entry, which is not really a gate. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:17, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, or else merge to Category:Gates. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:17, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination Vyvagaba (talk) 10:11, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Category:Commercial buildings in the United Arab Emirates
- Nominator's rationale: This will only contain one category after the below nomination. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:17, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Merge, irrespective of the outcome of the below discussion, because with only two subcategories it is also a redundant category layer. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:52, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Category:Museums in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi
- Nominator's rationale: Pointless category layer. Contains only two subcategories that can be reached via other paths from all parents. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:17, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Not useful and is already covered by Category:Museums in the United Arab Emirates by city Vyvagaba (talk) 10:16, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, redundant category layer with only two subcategories. There is no need to merge, the content is already in Category:Museums in the United Arab Emirates by city and Category:Buildings and structures in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:02, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep — calling this and other categories on this page "pointless" is denigrating to the creating editors, and other users, to whom the categories are not pointless. These categories match those for several "united" counties such as the UAE, UK, and USA, with sub-regions such as emirates/nations/states. Better reasoning based on Misplaced Pages policy rather than a personal and discourteous opinion is needed. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 15:13, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete for Now for now. Grouping these 2 subcategories doesn't aid navigation but, if there is future growth with direct articles or additional subcats, it may have use later. - RevelationDirect (talk) 01:11, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note — this category included two categories and an article on a museum. There are most likely other museums without an existing article in this category too since the Emirate of Abu Dhabi is far larger than just the cities of Abu Dhabi and Al Ain. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 18:19, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- Is there some reason that article can't just be put directly in Category:Museums in the United Arab Emirates? This is the only "by emirate" subcategory of that, and the parent isn't large enough to need further diffusion. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:21, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Category:Pyramids in Dubai
- Propose merging Category:Pyramids in Dubai to Category:Buildings and structures in Dubai and Category:Pyramids in Asia
- Nominator's rationale: Only one entry. The parent Category:Pyramids in the United Arab Emirates has no other members. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:17, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Merge Hard to see this category ever reaching 5+ articles. - RevelationDirect (talk) 11:48, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Merge It's not even a true pyramid. It's pyramidally or pyramidallic. Donchajustlove neologisms? Laurel Lodged (talk) 12:07, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:03, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Category:Skyscraper hotels in the United Arab Emirates by city
- Nominator's rationale: Pointless category layer. This is the only subcategory of its parent. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:17, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Merge for Now iwth no objection to recreating if any content arises. - RevelationDirect (talk) 12:22, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:04, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Category:Skyscraper office buildings in the United Arab Emirates by city
- Nominator's rationale: Pointless category layer. This is the only subcategory of its parent. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:17, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Merge for Now with no objection to recreation if more content appears later. - RevelationDirect (talk) 12:22, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:05, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Office buildings in the United Arab Emirates
- Nominator's rationale. Pointless category layer. Only content is Category:Skyscraper office buildings in the United Arab Emirates by city and Dubai International Financial Centre, which is not an office building. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:17, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete the Subcats/Neutral on Parent per nom. I'm wondering if the country one is worth keeping though to aid navigation across Category:Office buildings by country. (But there are already more subcats at Category:Skyscraper office buildings by country so maybe not.) - RevelationDirect (talk) 11:45, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Agree if Dubai International Financial Centre is not an office building, otherwise some merging is needed. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:49, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Category:Buildings and structures in Dubai by condition
- Nominator's rationale: Pointless category layer. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:17, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:29, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. "by condition"? Really? Laurel Lodged (talk) 19:25, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- That reminds me: also merge per this precedent: Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_April_7#By_condition. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:12, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
Category:Recipients of the Naguib Mahfouz Medal for Literature
- Propose Deleting Category:Recipients of the Naguib Mahfouz Medal for Literature
- Nominator's rationale: WP:OCAWARD, WP:PERFCAT, WP:NONDEFINING
- The American University in Cairo has an annual project where they pick a worthy book in Arabic, translate it into English, and then publish it through their University Press. The Naguib Mahfouz Medal for Literature definitely fits the school's cross-cultural mission. This category groups authors who wrote the winning books but those biography articles don't treat this award as defining, generally listing it with other honours. The category contents are already listified right here in the main article for any reader interested in the topic. - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:20, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Background We deleted another university award/publishing deal category right here. - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:20, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:35, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Category:Prix Jean Freustié winners
- Propose Deleting Category:Prix Jean Freustié winners
- Nominator's rationale: WP:OCAWARD, WP:NONDEFINING
- The Jean Freustié Prize is a literary award from France given to French-language authors of "prose work: a novel, short story, autobiography, biography or essay". The author articles don't treat this award as defining, generally listing it with other honours. This is one of many French literary award categories created in late 2016/early 2017. The category contents are already listified right here in the main article for any reader interested in the topic. - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:20, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:35, 24 June 2023 (UTC)