Revision as of 18:36, 22 September 2023 editCourcelles (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators434,776 edits →Suspected sockpuppets: and another... this keeps going deeper← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:42, 22 September 2023 edit undoCourcelles (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators434,776 edits →Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments: ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit → | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== | ====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== | ||
*Added Wifruit. ] (]) 18:33, 22 September 2023 (UTC) | *Added Wifruit. ] (]) 18:33, 22 September 2023 (UTC) | ||
*:Ended up adding a bunch. I can confirm Dashfree, Wifruit, Poet, Stoic, and East West. There's a technical chain linking all five of those accounts. The same chain does not ensnare INF or Dpkpdr, but that's not necessarily a reason not to block them. Throwing down the queue for a behavior check. ] (]) 18:42, 22 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> | ----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
Revision as of 18:42, 22 September 2023
Dpkpdr
Dpkpdr (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
This case was moved to Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Dpkpdr from Poeticoda (talk · contribs). Future cases should be placed there.
20 September 2023
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
Suspected sockpuppets
- INFjorder (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Dashfree (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Wifruit (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Poeticoda (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- StoicAurelius (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- East West AOT (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
Three WP:SPA (first sock declared WP:COI) having a summary conversation with themselves on Talk:Dominic Ng before proceeding to a WP:BLP content dispute on the article page. See history at Dominic Ng. This appears to be an attempt to simulate a consensus for a COI editor. If CU doesn't indicate socks, please consider action per WP:MEAT. JFHJr (㊟) 04:56, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
This may be relevant. CurryCity (talk) 06:05, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Added Wifruit. Courcelles (talk) 18:33, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- Ended up adding a bunch. I can confirm Dashfree, Wifruit, Poet, Stoic, and East West. There's a technical chain linking all five of those accounts. The same chain does not ensnare INF or Dpkpdr, but that's not necessarily a reason not to block them. Throwing down the queue for a behavior check. Courcelles (talk) 18:42, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Categories: