Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Poeticoda: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:36, 22 September 2023 editCourcelles (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators434,776 edits Suspected sockpuppets: and another... this keeps going deeper← Previous edit Revision as of 18:42, 22 September 2023 edit undoCourcelles (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators434,776 edits Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments: ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit →
Line 15: Line 15:
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== ====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====
*Added Wifruit. ] (]) 18:33, 22 September 2023 (UTC) *Added Wifruit. ] (]) 18:33, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
*:Ended up adding a bunch. I can confirm Dashfree, Wifruit, Poet, Stoic, and East West. There's a technical chain linking all five of those accounts. The same chain does not ensnare INF or Dpkpdr, but that's not necessarily a reason not to block them. Throwing down the queue for a behavior check. ] (]) 18:42, 22 September 2023 (UTC)


----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> ----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->

Revision as of 18:42, 22 September 2023

Dpkpdr

Dpkpdr (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

This case was moved to Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Dpkpdr from Poeticoda (talk · contribs). Future cases should be placed there.


20 September 2023

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

Suspected sockpuppets

Three WP:SPA (first sock declared WP:COI) having a summary conversation with themselves on Talk:Dominic Ng before proceeding to a WP:BLP content dispute on the article page. See history at Dominic Ng. This appears to be an attempt to simulate a consensus for a COI editor. If CU doesn't indicate socks, please consider action per WP:MEAT. JFHJr () 04:56, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

This may be relevant. CurryCity (talk) 06:05, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


Categories:
Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Poeticoda: Difference between revisions Add topic