Revision as of 19:07, 27 September 2023 editCitation bot (talk | contribs)Bots5,459,928 edits Removed parameters. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | #UCB_CommandLine← Previous edit |
Revision as of 22:08, 28 September 2023 edit undoJ04n (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators162,685 edits Rescuing 5 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.5Tag: IABotManagementConsole [1.3]Next edit → |
Line 30: |
Line 30: |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
'''''Tuglak''''' ({{lang-kn|ತುಗ್ಲಕ್}}) is a 2012 Indian ]-language film directed by ], starring ], ] and Anisha Ummer.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.deccanherald.com/content/253765/its-one-shot-wonder.html|title=It's a one shot wonder|work=]|date=2 June 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.deccanherald.com/content/226091/film-release.html|title=Film release|work=]|date=10 February 2012}}</ref> |
|
'''''Tuglak''''' ({{lang-kn|ತುಗ್ಲಕ್}}) is a 2012 Indian ]-language film directed by ], starring ], ] and Anisha Ummer.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.deccanherald.com/content/253765/its-one-shot-wonder.html|title=It's a one shot wonder|work=]|date=2 June 2012|access-date=28 July 2022|archive-date=28 July 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220728112612/https://www.deccanherald.com/content/253765/its-one-shot-wonder.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.deccanherald.com/content/226091/film-release.html|title=Film release|work=]|date=10 February 2012|access-date=28 July 2022|archive-date=26 July 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220726090927/https://www.deccanherald.com/content/226091/film-release.html|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
==Cast== |
|
==Cast== |
Line 100: |
Line 100: |
|
=== Critical response === |
|
=== Critical response === |
|
|
|
|
|
R G Vijayasarathy of '']'' scored the film at 2.5 out of 5 stars and says "Arjun's music is passable. Camerawork by Manu Apler is a major highlight of the film. The film could have been more engaging and interesting".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.rediff.com/movies/review/south-review-tughlaq-fails-to-engage/20120213.htm|title=Review: Tughlaq is not engaging enough|work=]|date=13 February 2012}}</ref> '']'' wrote "Anisha Umar, in her first Kannada film, is passable and Meghana has just added another film to her list. B Suresha in the role of a don is neither scary or funny. The camerawork and the editing where the cuts are invisible are the plus points of the film. Otherwise, the director should take the blame. Period".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://bangaloremirror.indiatimes.com/entertainment/reviews/thuglak-thuglakian-idea/articleshow/21427868.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst|title=Thuglak : Thuglakian idea|work=]|date=9 February 2012}}</ref> '']'' wrote "“Tuglak” lives up to its title. An effort that holds itself back just short of brilliance, “Tuglak” simplifies the dilemma many face, but leaves the audience dissatisfied. Just as the sultan of yore, perhaps?"<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.deccanherald.com/amp/content/226426/tuglak.html|title=Tuglak|work=]|date=11 February 2012}}</ref> |
|
R G Vijayasarathy of '']'' scored the film at 2.5 out of 5 stars and says "Arjun's music is passable. Camerawork by Manu Apler is a major highlight of the film. The film could have been more engaging and interesting".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.rediff.com/movies/review/south-review-tughlaq-fails-to-engage/20120213.htm|title=Review: Tughlaq is not engaging enough|work=]|date=13 February 2012|access-date=28 July 2022|archive-date=8 April 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220408053356/https://www.rediff.com/movies/review/south-review-tughlaq-fails-to-engage/20120213.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> '']'' wrote "Anisha Umar, in her first Kannada film, is passable and Meghana has just added another film to her list. B Suresha in the role of a don is neither scary or funny. The camerawork and the editing where the cuts are invisible are the plus points of the film. Otherwise, the director should take the blame. Period".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://bangaloremirror.indiatimes.com/entertainment/reviews/thuglak-thuglakian-idea/articleshow/21427868.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst|title=Thuglak : Thuglakian idea|work=]|date=9 February 2012|access-date=28 July 2022|archive-date=28 July 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220728111018/https://bangaloremirror.indiatimes.com/entertainment/reviews/thuglak-thuglakian-idea/articleshow/21427868.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst|url-status=live}}</ref> '']'' wrote "“Tuglak” lives up to its title. An effort that holds itself back just short of brilliance, “Tuglak” simplifies the dilemma many face, but leaves the audience dissatisfied. Just as the sultan of yore, perhaps?"<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.deccanherald.com/amp/content/226426/tuglak.html|title=Tuglak|work=]|date=11 February 2012|access-date=28 July 2022|archive-date=26 July 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220726085543/https://www.deccanherald.com/amp/content/226426/tuglak.html|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
==References== |
|
==References== |