Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
:I'd take that to ] if you think it needs a mass revert. But it looks like they're just complying with ] to me. Your comment on their user page doesn't really accord with how we use those words in the UK. ]] 11:47, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
:I'd take that to ] if you think it needs a mass revert. But it looks like they're just complying with ] to me. Your comment on their user page doesn't really accord with how we use those words in the UK. ]] 11:47, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
== Multiple unregistered users vandalizing numerical data ==
Hello! I just caught word from a user post on the Brazil Wikiproject that several unregistered IP users are making minor vandalization edits to Brazilian population data and I'm not sure how to handle this. Some of these users include ], ], ], and ] (The rest can be seen in the ]). Why don't these kinds of edits get caught by the anti-vandalism systems we have in place? Also, how can i go I about warning these users and/or preventing them from continuing to vandalize if they continue? ] (]) 23:39, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Revision as of 23:39, 11 November 2023
IRC CHANNEL: #wikipedia-cvu
Before posting your message, please make sure you are in the right place:
Hi there, I noticed a user has made a large number of disruptive edits but they don't appear to be intentional vandalism. Who would I go to to report this to be mass undo'd?
I'd take that to WP:AN if you think it needs a mass revert. But it looks like they're just complying with WP:ENGVAR to me. Your comment on their user page doesn't really accord with how we use those words in the UK. WaggersTALK11:47, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Multiple unregistered users vandalizing numerical data
Hello! I just caught word from a user post on the Brazil Wikiproject that several unregistered IP users are making minor vandalization edits to Brazilian population data and I'm not sure how to handle this. Some of these users include 168.0.48.88, 168.0.48.91, 45.173.185.4, and 168.0.50.64 (The rest can be seen in the edits reverted by Qmwnebrvtcyxuz). Why don't these kinds of edits get caught by the anti-vandalism systems we have in place? Also, how can i go I about warning these users and/or preventing them from continuing to vandalize if they continue? BaduFerreira (talk) 23:39, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
The redirect Counter-Vandalism Unit has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 26 § Counter-Vandalism Unit until a consensus is reached. #prodraxis 19:50, 26 August 2023 (UTC)