| Revision as of 18:41, 19 January 2024 editAirshipJungleman29 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors45,084 edits GAR noticeTag: New topic← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:56, 20 January 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,311,180 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Hans Adler/Archive 7) (botNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| ] I do not use "talkback" templates, and it rarely if ever makes sense to leave me such templates.<br/>] I could never see the point of the stickers I sometimes got in elementary school. Please do not embarrass me with "awards" or "barnstars" or the like.<br/>] I do not fancy non-consensual ]. | ] I do not use "talkback" templates, and it rarely if ever makes sense to leave me such templates.<br/>] I could never see the point of the stickers I sometimes got in elementary school. Please do not embarrass me with "awards" or "barnstars" or the like.<br/>] I do not fancy non-consensual ]. | ||
| == Respite == | |||
| ] attached to New Holland is in need of German research.]] | |||
| * {{On AFD|Bucket crusher}} | |||
| If you find that you want something entirely unrelated to controversy to work on, there's an article on German buckets that needs some research. ] (]) 14:30, 7 July 2019 (UTC) | |||
| *:Good try, but I remember well how (wow! more than 10 years ago!) led to ], and today I won't let you do this to me! | |||
| *:Reminds me of ], by the way. ] 15:39, 7 July 2019 (UTC) | |||
| Try {{oldid|Forehead|299076199|Forehead}}. ☺ I had actually forgotten the pigeons, and wasn't aware of what happened after AFD. You are not the only person whose spirits I am keeping up in these trying times. See ]. ] (]) 23:01, 7 July 2019 (UTC) | |||
| The best thing is that I now get to do this. ] the Brieftaubefotografie! | |||
| * {{cite newspaper|ref=harv|title=Als die Bilder fliegen lernten|url=https://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/neu-ulm/Als-die-Bilder-fliegen-lernten-id32159992.html|date=2014-11-28|magazine=Augsburger Allgemeine|author1-first=Dagmar|author1-last=Hob}} | |||
| * {{cite magazine|ref=harv|title=„Flieg Taube flieg“ — Geflügelte Pioniere der Luftbild-Fotografie|magazine=]|url=http://berliner-umschau.de/?p=2793|date=2018-04-09|author1-last=Redaktion}} | |||
| * {{cite magazine|ref=harv|title=Diese Fotos zeigen, dass Brieftauben die cooleren Drohnen waren|url=https://www.journal-frankfurt.de/journal_news/Kultur-9/Gefluegelte-Fotografen-aus-Kronberg-Diese-Fotos-zeigen-dass-Brieftauben-die-cooleren-Drohnen-waren-31584.html|magazine=]|date=2018-03-15}} | |||
| * {{cite web|ref=harv|title=Sonderausstellung: Die Brieftaube als Fotograf|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRfIyK0a03o|date=2018-03-21|publisher=]|author=Deutsches Technikmuseum}} | |||
| * {{cite web|ref=harv|publisher=Stiftung Deutsches Technikmuseum Berlin|title=Die Brieftaube als Fotograf|date=2018|url=https://sdtb.de/technikmuseum/ausstellungen/die-brieftaube-als-fotograf/}} | |||
| * https://www.webstagram.one/media/BibuURhHOuB | |||
| * https://analoguestories.wordpress.com/2018/10/05/book-the-pigeon-photographer/ | |||
| * {{cite book|ref=harv|title=The Pigeon Photographer: By Julius Neubronner & His Pigeons|author1-first=Nicoló|author1-last=Degiorgis|author2-first=Audrey|author2-last=Solomon|publisher=Rorhof|year=2017|isbn=9788894881073|url=http://www.rorhof.com/books/the-pigeon-photographer}} | |||
| ] (]) 18:13, 8 July 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == German philosophy == | |||
| * {{On AFD|Agnes Taubert}} | |||
| It may all end in tears, but enjoy this in the meantime. ] (]) 11:55, 14 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process == | == A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process == | ||
Revision as of 16:56, 20 January 2024
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
In the near future I may not read my talk page as frequently and reliably as I used to do. For urgent or important matters, it may be better to use email. I am actually completely inactive nowadays. If you leave a message here, don't rely on getting an answer in less than a couple of years.
I do not use "talkback" templates, and it rarely if ever makes sense to leave me such templates.
I could never see the point of the stickers I sometimes got in elementary school. Please do not embarrass me with "awards" or "barnstars" or the like.
I do not fancy non-consensual templated "WikiLove".
A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process
Hello!
The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.
Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.
The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.
Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Court piece
Hi Hans Adler, according to this source court piece and troefcall are not exactly the same games. Troefcall has probably been derived form court piece. See also here: "It has some similarity to the Indian game Court Piece". I think you'd better change the article of court piece yourself, because you added it there. Thanks! Ymnes (talk) 12:25, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks! I guess you found my very old (2011) redirect from troefcall to court piece. As I remember it, at the time there were dozens of stubs and sub-stubs for various very similar games, many under several names, and often also under several spelling variants per name. None of them had a proper source. I will slightly rephrase the court piece article to make it clear that troefcall is a related game and likely derivative, not the same game. In the long run we should probably have a section on it that explains the difference, but I am not sure that I will find the time to write it myself. Depending on how substantial these differences are, a separate article might make sense, but I don't really expect that this will be necessary (or useful). Hans Adler 16:13, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for your change in the article. Well it's expected to be a derivative, but also it has similarities with belote and hearts (which are very popular among Dutch). So it may after all be a mix of several worlds. It's quite a developed card game among Surinamese meanwhile. Since I have researched quite a lot in order to write the Dutch language article, I just decided to write an English version as well. See troefcall. Have a nice day! Ymnes (talk) 16:47, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks, as you clearly know this game well I trust you know what you are doing. Of course you are free to correct the court piece article yourself if more is required. There is no article ownership. Hans Adler 09:21, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for your change in the article. Well it's expected to be a derivative, but also it has similarities with belote and hearts (which are very popular among Dutch). So it may after all be a mix of several worlds. It's quite a developed card game among Surinamese meanwhile. Since I have researched quite a lot in order to write the Dutch language article, I just decided to write an English version as well. See troefcall. Have a nice day! Ymnes (talk) 16:47, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago
 | |
| Ten years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:05, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Jass
A tag has been placed on Category:Jass indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz 21:20, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Apothecaries' system
Apothecaries' system has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:41, 19 January 2024 (UTC)