| Revision as of 16:36, 14 January 2024 editTitan2456 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,540 edits →Drive-by nominations: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:59, 27 January 2024 edit undoCremastra (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers23,790 edits →GA: new sectionTag: New topicNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| :I was a unaware of that rule, Thank you for alerting me. ] (]) 16:36, 14 January 2024 (UTC) | :I was a unaware of that rule, Thank you for alerting me. ] (]) 16:36, 14 January 2024 (UTC) | ||
| == GA == | |||
| I would really, strongly, advise you to withdraw your nomination for ]. It is a long way from GA. It has bare urls, non-standard formatting, and needs a vigorous copyedit. I haven't looked at the sourcing quality, but there are several unreferenced claims. I urge your to quietly withdraw it and gain experience with the GA criteria, rather than have it quick-failed, which is liable to happen. ] (]) 17:59, 27 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:59, 27 January 2024
January 2024
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Thomas L. Kennedy Secondary School, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 21:47, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- My apologies, I will try to find a citation or a source and edit it a later time, Thank you. Titan2456 (talk) 21:56, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Drive-by nominations
Please stop nominating articles you have no contributions to for GA. This is against the rules and all drive-by nominations have been reverted. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 16:03, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- I was a unaware of that rule, Thank you for alerting me. Titan2456 (talk) 16:36, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
GA
I would really, strongly, advise you to withdraw your nomination for Treaty of Saadabad. It is a long way from GA. It has bare urls, non-standard formatting, and needs a vigorous copyedit. I haven't looked at the sourcing quality, but there are several unreferenced claims. I urge your to quietly withdraw it and gain experience with the GA criteria, rather than have it quick-failed, which is liable to happen. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 17:59, 27 January 2024 (UTC)