Misplaced Pages

User talk:Tonymetz: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:35, 27 February 2024 editTonymetz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users970 edits Undid revision 1210522528 by Tonymetz (talk)Tag: Undo← Previous edit Revision as of 01:37, 27 February 2024 edit undoTonymetz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users970 edits collapse old sectionNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}} {{Talk header}}


{{cot|title=Old content}}
== Your submission at ]: ] (May 18) == == Your submission at ]: ] (May 18) ==
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> ]Your recent article submission to ] has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason<!-- pluralize "reason" --><!--empty--> left by KJP1 was: <div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> ]Your recent article submission to ] has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason<!-- pluralize "reason" --><!--empty--> left by KJP1 was:
Line 16: Line 17:


] (]) 05:12, 18 May 2018 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc decline--> ] (]) 05:12, 18 May 2018 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc decline-->
{{cob}}


== What part of.... == == What part of.... ==

Revision as of 01:37, 27 February 2024

This is Tonymetz's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.
Archives: 1
Old content

Your submission at Articles for creation: Earny (May 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was: This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Misplaced Pages's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Misplaced Pages, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. The comment the reviewer left was: Blatant advert by a paid contributor. Nothing like the Notability required for companies. Tagging for deletion. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. KJP1 (talk) 05:12, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

What part of....

"I won't be partaking" did you not understand? Fred Zepelin (talk) 00:40, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

the low quality citations have not yet been addressed. I pointed out the issues with both. I'm aiming to keep the bar high for citations. If the claim is endorsed by facts, we should have no problem finding high quality sources. Tonymetz (talk) 00:48, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
@Fred Zepelin I raised this on Misplaced Pages:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Joe Kent
Are we being objective on the quality of these citations? Perhaps we should work with a disinterested party? Tonymetz (talk) 00:57, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
This tone and approach is out of line . Let's stay on topic WP:TALK#OBJECTIVE Tonymetz (talk) 01:13, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
User talk:Tonymetz: Difference between revisions Add topic