Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 20:02, 9 April 2007

Archives

June '06 – March '07

Deletion of Covers of X Japan

Hey, why you have erased my commentaries of discs of X Japan? also why you have erased the covers of I kill you and Orgasm single?, excuse me, but you aren't the owner of wikipedia, I have the same right that you to modify and to collaborate with the encyclopedia. In addition, my sources are reliable, not because you say that they are not it. Shadowxfox

Request for edit summary

Hi. It would be nice if you could use an edit summary a bit more often, and even for minor edits if the changes are subtle and not obvious from a diff why they are done, like here. Thanks. You can reply here if you have comments. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 03:14, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Complete Discography and Videography of X Japan

Guten tag !

Well, as my sources about X Japan are unreliable and sooner or later you erase my commentaries of each one of articles, I propose to you that yourself complete the X Japan's videography with your comments and sources, and I will provide to you the covers with reliable and recognized sources.

PS: http://www.jpophelp.com is a reliable source?

Shadowxfox 04:43, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Sources of my covers

http://www.jpophelp.com/scripts/proddetails.asp?artistORD=X+Japan&dnum=200&majorcategory=visual (jpophelp contains all the covers, although some are in different sections)

http://www.cdjapan.co.jp/search.html?type=AC&restrict=ALL&strict=&word=X+Japan (some covers, specially those of the new collections)

Shadowxfox 04:53, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of I'll Kill You (The Catnip Peddlers song)

An editor has nominated I'll Kill You (The Catnip Peddlers song), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/I'll Kill You (The Catnip Peddlers song) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 20:26, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Providence Marketplace Cleanup

I cleaned up the entire page, removing what seemed to be advertising out of the page. I also set up new references. Hopefully, I will be able to get some inages and better references onto the page. I removed the deletion tag and also the advertisment template. If you disapprove of it, you may place the templates again and explain it on my talk page.--Mxc140 18:03, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

TJ Spyke RfC

After looking over the basic form for an RfC, I'm not sure what I would put as the desired outcome. "I want him to stop doing this type of thing" really doesn't sound that great. Any ideas? -- The Hybrid 03:41, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Actually, I think that I just found a better solution than an RfC. Peace, -- The Hybrid 04:14, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Clamp subcats

I don't think it's worth the effort to rename Category:CLAMP cast members because the category has been tagged for listify-then-delete along with most other "xyz by series" categories. For Category:CLAMP images, what do you think is the best name for the new cat? Category:Clamp (manga group) images ?? -- Neier 08:23, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

I think it's a good idea to keep each other informed. I started trough Category:Japanese albums, and when I hit G∞VER, my head exploded. I think that one is going to need a WP:RM to reach any concensus. Neier 12:07, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

I figured the speedy rename for the Clamp subcats would not be a simple matter. :-(

In a related note, you may want to chime in at Talk:Sci-Fi Harry where "correct" is being argued. Neier 23:49, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Toshimitsu Deyama photo

I deleted Image:Toshimitsu deyama.jpg as a recreation of Image:Toshi22.jpg, which was previously deleted as a replaceable fair use image. Please don't upload any more copyrighted promotional photographs of living people. ˉˉ╦╩ 01:52, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages fair use criteria; see also wikimedia:Resolution:Licensing policy. These links document a general shift in policy that happened early last year. All replaceable fair use photographs are currently being phased out. Thank you for your cooperation, ˉˉ╦╩ 02:08, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but adding a fair use rationale won't change the copyright status of this photograph - it will remain a replaceable fair use image. ˉˉ╦╩ 02:14, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Correct. BTW, is this Deyama? ˉˉ╦╩ 02:34, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

X Japan and popular culture

Hello, this days I was thiking of making an article about X Japan and popular culture, and right now I'm at this User:Darkcat21/X_Japan, it would be cool If you can help me in the article, grammar, finding sources. Thank you. Darkcat21 21:21, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

I understand you, but for example there are bands that have information about covers on the article of the song and on the article about their influence and then the other information it looks better in an article about them and the popular culture rather than in a trivia section. And about solo efforts of certain members do not have anything to do with X Japan's mark in pop culture, oh it's just that in the same page it would cover the info about hide and X Japan. Anyway if you don't like i won't make it, it's ok. Thanks.Darkcat21 13:07, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Talk:X Japan and WP:3O

I saw your request for a third opinion. We've been developing a bit of a backlog, which is unusual.

I have also been a target of insults from the other editor, so I can't personally address this one. ("Third opinions must be neutral. If you have previously had dealings with the article or with the editors… do not offer a third opinion on that dispute." —Providing third opinions.) — Athænara ✉ 20:02, 9 April 2007 (UTC)