Misplaced Pages

Talk:The Rolling Stones/to do: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Talk:The Rolling Stones Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:50, 4 April 2007 editHisSpaceResearch (talk | contribs)Rollbackers14,814 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 22:08, 9 April 2007 edit undo72.240.44.202 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 6: Line 6:
*Fannish tone. *Fannish tone.
*After cleanup, improve to good article status. *After cleanup, improve to good article status.
*Eat Lunch

Revision as of 22:08, 9 April 2007

  • the entire article needs to be sectionalized (try more headings and subheadings); it doesn't look or read like a summary.
  • all images need sources and fair use rationales.
  • The section titles are not written with an encyclopedic tone
  • the sections themselves are extremely long. It seems like they could be reorganized so that instead of a chronology of the band, each section focused on one element of the band and how it changed throught the band's history.
  • Lead should be a summary of the articles content, and is rather brief considering the length of the article and the 40+ years the band have existed
  • Fannish tone.
  • After cleanup, improve to good article status.
  • Eat Lunch
Talk:The Rolling Stones/to do: Difference between revisions Add topic