| Revision as of 23:24, 27 October 2024 editZimZalaBim (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers47,921 edits →WP:PULLQUOTE: reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:52, 28 October 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,310,684 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:ZimZalaBim/Archive 12) (botNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| | minthreadsleft = 5 | | minthreadsleft = 5 | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == ] == | |||
| {{edit conflict}} I'm trying to restore the page on mobile last 5 hours ago. I've also sent a thanks button. ] (] | ]) 12:21, 28 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for October 16 == | ==Disambiguation link notification for October 16 == | ||
Revision as of 17:52, 28 October 2024
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Disambiguation link notification for October 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aftershock Festival, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Inquiry
Do you mind telling me which LTA these two accounts were used by? We should probably be checking their other habitual targets. 184.152.68.190 (talk) 17:19, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- I only noticed activity on Recent Changes today. Don't have any additional info. --ZimZalaBim 17:21, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Alright thanks, I guess I'll look into it later if I have time. 184.152.68.190 (talk) 17:24, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Just FYI, it's WP:LTA/UAK, interests are varied but I may have time to do a quick peruse anyway to check for anything else obvious that got missed; makes for easy multitasking. Probably some others I should check in on too. 184.152.68.190 (talk) 00:52, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Rekom UK
Misplaced Pages is not being used as a directory however the locations of the company are being listed for reference purposes and should NOT have been removed. 2A02:C7C:70CF:4B00:D83B:AF8B:9EDE:CB62 (talk) 13:03, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- "locations of the company are being listed for reference purposes" is precisely what Misplaced Pages is not: we are not a directory. --ZimZalaBim 14:02, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
WP:PULLQUOTE
Re: your recent deletion, this is quoting a source at length, while a WP:PULLQUOTE is repeating the article itself for emphasis. You can object to the quote on other grounds (NPOV, UNDUE, etc), but IMHO it's a compact and accurate summary of a common viewpoint. Jpatokal (talk) 22:30, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- The thrust of the policy is the choice to highlight one source as "a compact and accurate summary of a common viewpoint" is itself an NPOV/UNDUE determination. Just let the article's text and sources speak for themselves; we don't need to cherrypick and highlight. --ZimZalaBim 23:24, 27 October 2024 (UTC)