Misplaced Pages

British Rail Class 390: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:06, 28 January 2005 editBobblewik (talk | contribs)66,026 editsm units← Previous edit Revision as of 15:17, 7 February 2005 edit undoDan100 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users29,137 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
] at ] on 24th September 2003 with a service to ]. These units now work the majority of ] services.]] ] at ] on 24th September 2003 with a service to ]. These units now work the majority of ] services.]]
] on 27th August 2004, whilst forming a ] to ] express. This unit is painted in the latest ] silver and red livery.]] ] on 27th August 2004, whilst forming a ] to ] express. This unit is painted in the latest ] silver and red livery.]]
The ] '''Class 390 ]''' ]s are ]s built by ], but utilising ] tilt systems. Fifty-three 9-car units were built for ] from ]-], and were introduced on the ]. These trains were the last to be built at Alstom's ] plant before its closure in ]. The ] '''Class 390 ]''' ]s are ]s built by ] utilising ] tilt systems. Fifty-three 9-car units were built for ] from ]-], and were introduced on the ]. These trains were the last to be built at Alstom's ] plant before its closure in ].


==Description== ==Description==
Line 8: Line 8:
Tilting trains were nothing new for the ]. Twenty years previously, ] had developed the revolutionary, but ultimately unsuccessful ] ] (APT). Despite their failure in revenue earning service, much of the technology was used in later designs of tilting train, so the Class 390 could be considered the de-facto successor to the APT. Tilting trains were nothing new for the ]. Twenty years previously, ] had developed the revolutionary, but ultimately unsuccessful ] ] (APT). Despite their failure in revenue earning service, much of the technology was used in later designs of tilting train, so the Class 390 could be considered the de-facto successor to the APT.


The new trains were originally intended to run at 140 mph (225 km/h). However, the West Coast Mainline modernisation programme, which was an upgrade to the infrastructure to allow faster line speeds, went massively overbudget. Consequently, plans were scaled back resulting in the maximum line speed now being designated at only 125 mph (200 km/h). Since the construction of the fleet, hardware modifications have subsequently been performed to reflect this lower speed, so the trains are now physically limited to 125 mph (200 km/h) passenger running. This compares to the maximum speed of 125 mph (200 km/h) for the APT in passenger service, although one set reached 162 mph (261 km/h) in tests. The new trains were originally intended to run at 140 mph (225 km/h). However, the West Coast Mainline modernisation programme, which was an upgrade to the infrastructure to allow faster line speeds, ran overbudget. Consequently, plans were scaled back resulting in the maximum line speed now being restricted to only 125 mph (200 km/h). Since the construction of the fleet, hardware modifications have subsequently been performed to reflect this lower speed, so the trains are now physically limited to 125 mph (200 km/h) passenger running. This equals the maximum speed of 125 mph (200 km/h) for the APT in passenger service, although one APT set reached 162 mph (261 km/h) in tests.


Fifty-three units were built, numbered 390001-390053. Each unit is formed of nine vehicles, however, the first 34 sets were built as 8-car units, with the ninth vehicle built later and retro-fitted into the unit during ]. The unit formation is described in the table below, with vehicles listed in the order they are formed in the unit. Fifty-three units were built, numbered 390001-390053. Each unit is formed of nine vehicles, however the first 34 sets were built as 8-car units, with the ninth vehicle built later and retro-fitted into the unit during ]. The unit formation is described in the table below, with vehicles listed in the order they are formed in the unit.
{| border="1" cellpadding="2" {| border="1" cellpadding="2"
!rowspan=2|Vehicle numbers !rowspan=2|Vehicle numbers

Revision as of 15:17, 7 February 2005

Class 390, no. 390029 "City of Stoke-on-Trent" at Birmingham New Street on 24th September 2003 with a service to Wolverhampton. These units now work the majority of Virgin West Coast services.
Class 390, no. 390045 "Virgin Valiant" at Carlisle on 27th August 2004, whilst forming a Glasgow Central to London Euston express. This unit is painted in the latest Virgin Trains silver and red livery.

The British Rail Class 390 "Pendolino" electrical multiple units are tilting trains built by Alstom utilising Fiat tilt systems. Fifty-three 9-car units were built for Virgin Trains from 2001-2004, and were introduced on the West Coast Main Line. These trains were the last to be built at Alstom's Washwood Heath plant before its closure in 2005.

Description

In 1997, when Virgin Trains won the InterCity West Coast franchise, they were obligated to replace the ageing train fleet they inherited with new trains. The old fleet consisted of an assortment of Classes 86, 87 and 90 electric locomotives, which operated in push-pull mode with Mk.2 and Mk.3 coaching stock. Therefore, in order to replace these trains, Virgin placed an order with Alstom/Fiat for the construction of new tilting trains.

Tilting trains were nothing new for the West Coast Main Line. Twenty years previously, British Rail had developed the revolutionary, but ultimately unsuccessful Class 370 Advanced Passenger Train (APT). Despite their failure in revenue earning service, much of the technology was used in later designs of tilting train, so the Class 390 could be considered the de-facto successor to the APT.

The new trains were originally intended to run at 140 mph (225 km/h). However, the West Coast Mainline modernisation programme, which was an upgrade to the infrastructure to allow faster line speeds, ran overbudget. Consequently, plans were scaled back resulting in the maximum line speed now being restricted to only 125 mph (200 km/h). Since the construction of the fleet, hardware modifications have subsequently been performed to reflect this lower speed, so the trains are now physically limited to 125 mph (200 km/h) passenger running. This equals the maximum speed of 125 mph (200 km/h) for the APT in passenger service, although one APT set reached 162 mph (261 km/h) in tests.

Fifty-three units were built, numbered 390001-390053. Each unit is formed of nine vehicles, however the first 34 sets were built as 8-car units, with the ninth vehicle built later and retro-fitted into the unit during 2004. The unit formation is described in the table below, with vehicles listed in the order they are formed in the unit.

Vehicle numbers Type Description Seating
1st 2nd Toilets
69101-69153 DMRFO Driving motor: first-class open with restaurant 18 - -
69401-69453 MFOD Intermediate motor: first-class open (with disabled seating) 39 - 1(D)
69501-69553 PTFO Intermediate Trailer fitted with pantograph: first-class open 44 - 1
69601-69653 MFO Intermediate motor: first-class open 46 - 1
68801-68853 TSO Intermediate trailer: second-class open - 76 1
69701-69753 MSO Intermediate motor: second-class open (with disabled seating) - 66 1(D)
69801-69853 PTSRMB Intermediate trailer fitted with pantograph: second-class with shop/buffet - 48 -
69901-69953 MSO Intermediate motor: second-class open (with disabled seating) - 64 1(D)
69201-69253 DMSO Driving motor: second-class open - 46 1

The train includes priority seating for wheelchair users, a small shop and a buffet counter.

Current operations

The fleet was introduced onto passenger services from London Euston to Manchester Piccadilly in mid-2002 to coincide with the opening of the 2002 Commonwealth Games in Manchester. Over the next few months they began to monopolise the Manchester services, and were soon introduced onto other routes to Liverpool Lime Street, Birmingham New Street, Wolverhampton and Preston. By the late-2003 the last of the elderly Class 86 locomotives had been withdrawn due to the introduction of the Pendolinos.

2004 saw their sphere of operation expand further. The units started to operate services to Glasgow Central, and by the end of summer, in theory at least all services north of Preston were worked by Class 390 units. This allowed the final Class 90 locomotives to be withdrawn, and inroads were made into the main Class 87 fleet. It was expected that all locomotive hauled trains would have been replaced by the end of 2004, but the Pendolinos suffered from several technical problems, thus giving the Class 87s a stay of execution. By January 2005, only eight locomotives remained, however, used on peak London Euston-Birmingham New Street services. It is expected they will be retained for a few months whilst the Pendolinos undergo modifications to increase reliability.

Another development in 2004 was the clearing of the units for the North Wales Coast Line to Holyhead. Although this line is not electrified, Virgin's fleet of Class 57/3 diesel locomotives have special coupling adaptors to allow them to haul the electric units. Therefore, services to Holyhead work under electric power to Crewe, where a Class 57 is attached to the front to haul to train onwards.

Virgin Trains have named their entire fleet of unit. Most carry promotional names such as "Virgin Valiant", "Virgin Crusader" or "Virgin King". However, some have received traditional names such "City of London" or "City of Manchester". Names are carried on the MFO (696xx) vehicle.

External links

Electric multiple units of Great Britain
AC units
(300–399)
AC units
DC units
(700–899)
AC units
(pre-TOPS)
DC units
(400–599)
DC units
(original TOPS)
DC units
(pre-TOPS)
Battery units
Hydrogen units
Southern Railway
designations
Miscellaneous units
Families
Notes
  • 1: Renumbered as Class 332
  • 2: Renumbered as Class 325
  • 3: Renumbered as Class 701
  • 4: Renumbered as Class 720/6
  • 5: Bi- or tri-mode unit
  • 6: Renumbered as Class 802/2
  • 7: Renumbered as Class 810
  • 8: Grouping of different rolling stock types built to loading gauge of London Underground deep tube lines

Categories:
British Rail Class 390: Difference between revisions Add topic