Misplaced Pages

Talk:White phosphorus munition: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:37, 3 November 2024 editPamD (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers206,749 edits →White phosphorus munition or munitions?: ce← Previous edit Latest revision as of 13:41, 14 November 2024 edit undoOne cookie (talk | contribs)329 edits →Better copy of photo available: new sectionTag: New topic 
Line 60: Line 60:


:Not seeing any outstanding exception to ] for weapons, e.g., in ], ], ], ], ], etc. ] (]) 23:23, 3 November 2024 (UTC) :Not seeing any outstanding exception to ] for weapons, e.g., in ], ], ], ], ], etc. ] (]) 23:23, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

== Better copy of photo available ==

Would someone with edit privileges be able to swap the first photo under ''World War I, the inter-war period and World War II'' (https://commons.wikimedia.org/File:Phosphorus_explosion.gif) with the higher-res version available at https://commons.wikimedia.org/File:Night_attack_with_phosphorus_bombs_in_maneuvers._First_Corps_School._Gondrecourt,_France._-_NARA_-_530741.tif? ]<span style="display:inline-block;rotate:305deg;">🍪</span>] 13:41, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:41, 14 November 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the White phosphorus munition article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Technology / Weaponry Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.
B checklist
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
  1. Referencing and citation: criterion not met
  2. Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met
  3. Structure: criterion met
  4. Grammar and style: criterion not met
  5. Supporting materials: criterion met
Associated task forces:
/ 
Taskforce icon
Military science, technology, and theory task force
Taskforce icon
Weaponry task force
Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

  • You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
  • You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
  1. Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
  2. Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

  • Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
  • Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!
White phosphorus munition was a History good article, but it was removed from the list as it no longer met the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.
Review: November 20, 2007. (Reviewed version).
Archiving icon
Archives

2005: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2007: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2008: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2009: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2010: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2012: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2013: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2014: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2023: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2024: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec


This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

White phosphorus munition or munitions?

I see that this page was moved from the plural to the singular in August 2024, with no explanation given, and there seems to be nothing in the talk page about it.

I think the plural title is better English, and it's the form used in the text of the article.

As this article seems to be very controversial and highly protected, I hesitate to boldly move it. Could someone explain to me why the singular is the better title? Pinging @Hyphenation Expert: who moved it. PamD 23:14, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Not seeing any outstanding exception to WP:SINGULAR for weapons, e.g., in Category:Incendiary weapons, Precision-guided munition, Loitering munition, Cluster munition, Atomic demolition munition, etc. Hyphenation Expert (talk) 23:23, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Better copy of photo available

Would someone with edit privileges be able to swap the first photo under World War I, the inter-war period and World War II (https://commons.wikimedia.org/File:Phosphorus_explosion.gif) with the higher-res version available at https://commons.wikimedia.org/File:Night_attack_with_phosphorus_bombs_in_maneuvers._First_Corps_School._Gondrecourt,_France._-_NARA_-_530741.tif? one🍪cookie 13:41, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Categories:
Talk:White phosphorus munition: Difference between revisions Add topic