| Revision as of 00:01, 6 January 2025 editThe Bushranger (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators157,902 edits →January 2025: No← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:03, 6 January 2025 edit undo2601:182:e7e:23b0:d522:620:51d6:24bd (talk) →January 2025: ReplyTags: possible vandalism ReplyNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| :Discospinster, I understand your concerns, but my edits have indeed been constructive. It's evident that the page you've revived, ], shares substantial ] with ], and as such was rightfully redirected. Further redirects were corrected and updated, with clarifying improvements using the redirect shell - any reversal without evidence (you did not provide any edit summary nor additional references/citations) will be considered vandalism and abuse of editing tools. ] (]) 23:58, 5 January 2025 (UTC) | :Discospinster, I understand your concerns, but my edits have indeed been constructive. It's evident that the page you've revived, ], shares substantial ] with ], and as such was rightfully redirected. Further redirects were corrected and updated, with clarifying improvements using the redirect shell - any reversal without evidence (you did not provide any edit summary nor additional references/citations) will be considered vandalism and abuse of editing tools. ] (]) 23:58, 5 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| ::The blocks and page protection will continue until you stop evading your . - ] <sub>]</sub> 00:01, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | ::The blocks and page protection will continue until you stop evading your . - ] <sub>]</sub> 00:01, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| ::@], seeing as how you're new to this topic I'll summarize: Take a look at ] and you'll see that NO ONE actually responded to any legitimate conversation regarding the merge proposal, except for one user who actually pointed out the obvious WP:OVERLAP. Despite their pleas to other editors to actually respond on-topic, the whole discussion was wrongfully shut down by a gang of editors (including Bushranger) who abuse their power and do not allow quality edits, with correct and verified reliable sources. | |||
| ::The redirects stand. ] (]) 00:03, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| {{Block indent|''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider ] for yourself or ] so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''}}<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | {{Block indent|''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider ] for yourself or ] so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''}}<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | ||
Revision as of 00:03, 6 January 2025
January 2025
Hello, I'm Discospinster. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ... discospinster talk 23:55, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Discospinster, I understand your concerns, but my edits have indeed been constructive. It's evident that the page you've revived, Storrs, Connecticut, shares substantial WP:OVERLAP with Mansfield, Connecticut, and as such was rightfully redirected. Further redirects were corrected and updated, with clarifying improvements using the redirect shell - any reversal without evidence (you did not provide any edit summary nor additional references/citations) will be considered vandalism and abuse of editing tools. 2601:182:E7E:23B0:D522:620:51D6:24BD (talk) 23:58, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- The blocks and page protection will continue until you stop evading your indefinite block. - The Bushranger One ping only 00:01, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Discospinster, seeing as how you're new to this topic I'll summarize: Take a look at Talk:Storrs, Connecticut and you'll see that NO ONE actually responded to any legitimate conversation regarding the merge proposal, except for one user who actually pointed out the obvious WP:OVERLAP. Despite their pleas to other editors to actually respond on-topic, the whole discussion was wrongfully shut down by a gang of editors (including Bushranger) who abuse their power and do not allow quality edits, with correct and verified reliable sources.
- The redirects stand. 2601:182:E7E:23B0:D522:620:51D6:24BD (talk) 00:03, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Bushranger One ping only 23:56, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.