| Revision as of 05:51, 17 January 2025 editHariboneagle927 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users134,756 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:56, 17 January 2025 edit undoHariboneagle927 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users134,756 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| |status=Not passed | |status=Not passed | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| The '''Religious Instruction Bill''' also known as the '''Cuenco Bill''' was a ] sponsored by ] member ]. It was filed as House Bill No. 13043.<ref>{{cite web |title=Papers on the Cuenco Bill (H. no. 13043) |url=https://tuklas.up.edu.ph/Record/UP-99796217604404913?sid=6562942 |website=Tuklas |publisher=University Library, University of the Philippines Diliman |access-date=17 January 2025 |date=1965}}</ref> | The '''Religious Instruction Bill''' also known as the '''Cuenco Bill''' was a ] sponsored by ] member ]. It was filed as House Bill No. 13043 during the ].<ref>{{cite web |title=Papers on the Cuenco Bill (H. no. 13043) |url=https://tuklas.up.edu.ph/Record/UP-99796217604404913?sid=6562942 |website=Tuklas |publisher=University Library, University of the Philippines Diliman |access-date=17 January 2025 |date=1965}}</ref> | ||
| The ] has backed the institutionalizing of optional education of its catechism in public schools in the 1950s. The ] has allowed instructors supplied from the church before. In 1965, Miguel Cuenco filed a bill which would allow public school teachers to teach religion. This bill was likewise backed by the Catholic Church who branded the bill's critics as "enemies of the church".<ref name=sociologicalanalysis>{{cite journal |last1=Rivera |first1=Roberto E. N. |title=Philippine Catholicism as Disruptive Public Religion: A Sociological Analysis of Philippine Catholic Bishops’ Statements, 1946 to 2000 |journal=Philippine Sociological Review |date=2010 |volume=58 |pages=85-86|url=https://pssc.org.ph/wp-content/pssc-archives/Philippine%20Sociological%20Review/2010/Philippine%20Catholicism%20as%20Disruptive%20Public%20Religion.pdf |access-date=17 January 2025}}</ref> | The ] has backed the institutionalizing of optional education of its catechism in public schools in the 1950s. The ] has allowed instructors supplied from the church before. In 1965, Miguel Cuenco filed a bill which would allow public school teachers to teach religion. This bill was likewise backed by the Catholic Church who branded the bill's critics as "enemies of the church".<ref name=sociologicalanalysis>{{cite journal |last1=Rivera |first1=Roberto E. N. |title=Philippine Catholicism as Disruptive Public Religion: A Sociological Analysis of Philippine Catholic Bishops’ Statements, 1946 to 2000 |journal=Philippine Sociological Review |date=2010 |volume=58 |pages=85-86|url=https://pssc.org.ph/wp-content/pssc-archives/Philippine%20Sociological%20Review/2010/Philippine%20Catholicism%20as%20Disruptive%20Public%20Religion.pdf |access-date=17 January 2025}}</ref> | ||
Revision as of 05:56, 17 January 2025
| Religious Instruction Bill | |
|---|---|
| Congress of the Philippines | |
| Bill citation | House Bill No. 13043 |
| Introduced by | Representative Miguel Cuenco |
| Status: Not passed | |
The Religious Instruction Bill also known as the Cuenco Bill was a proposed legislation sponsored by House of Representatives member Miguel Cuenco. It was filed as House Bill No. 13043 during the 5th Congress.
The Roman Catholic Church has backed the institutionalizing of optional education of its catechism in public schools in the 1950s. The Department of Education has allowed instructors supplied from the church before. In 1965, Miguel Cuenco filed a bill which would allow public school teachers to teach religion. This bill was likewise backed by the Catholic Church who branded the bill's critics as "enemies of the church". Archbishop Julio Rosales of Cebu has urged president Diosdado Macapagal to endorse the bill a the Senate special session.
Noted opposition to the bill was the Christian denomination Iglesia ni Cristo who views that the Roman Catholic church could have a monopoly in religious instruction in public education. The INC's opposition was dramatized in the film, Ipakipaglaban ang Pananampalataya.
The bill did not pass.
References
- "Papers on the Cuenco Bill (H. no. 13043)". Tuklas. University Library, University of the Philippines Diliman. 1965. Retrieved 17 January 2025.
- ^ Rivera, Roberto E. N. (2010). "Philippine Catholicism as Disruptive Public Religion: A Sociological Analysis of Philippine Catholic Bishops' Statements, 1946 to 2000" (PDF). Philippine Sociological Review. 58: 85–86. Retrieved 17 January 2025.
- "Filipino Bishops Support Religious Education Bill". The Catholic Transcript. LXVIII (9): 21. 24 June 1965. Retrieved 17 January 2025.
- "History of Davao - Iglesia's influence-peddling circa 1965". Edge Davao. 14 December 2015. Retrieved 17 January 2025.
- Mayo, Stephanie (11 January 2025). "INC's faith and unity in cinema". Daily Tribune. Retrieved 17 January 2025.