Revision as of 17:50, 17 January 2025 editFlightTime (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors157,956 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:01, 18 January 2025 edit undoLiz (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators770,983 edits Misuse of rollbackTag: RevertedNext edit → | ||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
<!------------------------ New Sections Starts Here --------------> | <!------------------------ New Sections Starts Here --------------> | ||
==Misuse of rollback== | |||
Hello, FlightTime, | |||
I think you are using rollback to handle edits in mass and not examining them individually. Why was rollbacked? It was an editor replying on their own talk page, it was not vandalism. You should only use rollback for unambiguous vandalism, you should be using to rollback all of an editor's edits just because you have questions about one or two of them. You seem to be editing very zealously today and going after editors who are not remotely being disruptive. Please dial it back and assume good faith. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 02:01, 18 January 2025 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:01, 18 January 2025
Skip to table of contents |
Status: (Around)
FlightTime Phone ( talk · contribs · count · uploads · logs · rights)
FlightTime Public ( talk · contribs · count · uploads · logs · rights){{ping|FlightTime}}
with your message. Thank you
If you feel that I have reverted an edit or issued a warning in error, please Click Here and let me know. I am human, and I do make mistakes. Please don't interpret an error on my part as a personal attack on you. It's not, I promise. I ask you to simply bring it to my attention; I am always open to civil discussion. To keep discussions coherent, I will usually answer in the talk page where the first message was placed. If I left you a message on another talk page, please answer there: I will have it on my watch list. Thank you. | [REDACTED] |
No RfXs since 17:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC).—Talk to my owner:Online |
Alternate talk page | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Welcome To My Alternate Talk Page FlightTime ( talk · contribs · count · accounts · move log · global rename log · uploads · logs · rights) Click here to leave a new messageIf you're here, then my main talk page is protected. I do occasionally check this page, but to be sure I'm aware of your post please include {{ping|FlightTime}} with your message. Thank you FlightTime
It is 1:01 PM where this user lives in the Mojave Desert.
|
Welcome to my talk page.
Archives Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
This talk page is automatically archived by lowercase sigmabot III. Any threads with no replies in 14 days may be automatically moved. Threads with fewer than two timestamps (no replies) are not archived. |
Misuse of rollback
Hello, FlightTime,
I think you are using rollback to handle edits in mass and not examining them individually. Why was this edit rollbacked? It was an editor replying on their own talk page, it was not vandalism. You should only use rollback for unambiguous vandalism, you should be using to rollback all of an editor's edits just because you have questions about one or two of them. You seem to be editing very zealously today and going after editors who are not remotely being disruptive. Please dial it back and assume good faith. Liz 02:01, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Categories: