Misplaced Pages

Talk:Gulf of Mexico: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:34, 20 January 2025 view sourceAnother Believer (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers639,000 edits Gulf of America comment: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit Revision as of 17:35, 20 January 2025 view source Pigsonthewing (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors266,646 edits Executive order renaming to gulf of America: merging sections; work in progressNext edit →
Line 109: Line 109:
The final portion of the "History" section about d'Iberville's 1697 expedition needs to be cleaned up. As it is written it makes very little sense. There is a paragraph long run-on sentence which never manages to conclude a thought. ] (]) 01:04, 13 January 2025 (UTC) The final portion of the "History" section about d'Iberville's 1697 expedition needs to be cleaned up. As it is written it makes very little sense. There is a paragraph long run-on sentence which never manages to conclude a thought. ] (]) 01:04, 13 January 2025 (UTC)


== Executive order renaming to gulf of America == === Executive order renaming to gulf of America ===


Will be signed today, as per CNN reporting. ] (]) 15:10, 20 January 2025 (UTC) Will be signed today, as per CNN reporting. ] (]) 15:10, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:35, 20 January 2025

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gulf of Mexico article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 28 days 
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
WikiProject iconAlabama
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Alabama, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Alabama on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlabamaWikipedia:WikiProject AlabamaTemplate:WikiProject AlabamaAlabama
WikiProject iconFlorida High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconGeography High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconGeology High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMexico High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconNorth America High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject North AmericaNorth America
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject iconOceans High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Oceans, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of oceans, seas, and bays on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OceansWikipedia:WikiProject OceansTemplate:WikiProject OceansOceans
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Oceans To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconUnited States: Louisiana / Mississippi / Texas Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Louisiana (assessed as High-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Mississippi (assessed as High-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as High-importance).

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 September 2021 and 22 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): MakoEcho, Ambrilla, Wykdsurfr, TheOceanFish, FJoelson62, FrancisB1, Maso2345, Eleanor Dampier, Save-The-Butter, JKommer07, Kyemckeown55, Nbutler37, Achou05.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 August 2020 and 20 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kctolan, James092702, Sshaibi1, Jreyes92.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:51, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Images in the Geology section

Why are two images, one of ships and oil rigs and the other ostensibly of the Cantarell Field, stuck willy-nilly at the head of the Geology section, with no explanation or reference to either of them in the text? A reader would have no idea why we're showing these here, or what the "Cantarell Field" could possibly be (there is nothing, other than this name, in the caption). The other image in here, captioned "Sediment in the Gulf of Mexico", is equally out of place, but at least it shows part of the Gulf and landforms bordering the north of it. rowley (talk) 20:30, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

'Gulf of Mexico' to be renamed 'Gulf of America'

Unless it actually comes into fruition, not happening. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 23:03, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Per President Donald J. Trump. CheckbitD (talk) 18:51, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

And cue the troubles. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 18:55, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
All bluster until the United States Board on Geographic Names says different. Aresef (talk) 20:23, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
+1 — this doesn't even deserve a mention in the article unless and until something actually happens, this is just a sudden idea that popped up into his head in an impromptu press conference. Not every random firing of neurons from the future president's brain is notable, even if the 24 hour news cycle is more than happy to give attention to these sorts of comments.  Vanilla  Wizard 💙 20:54, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Not only that (which might inevitably befit another article in the near-future), but he also claims that the US should capture Greenland, Panama, Canada and so forth. In one incoherent minute. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 20:58, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
off-topic WP:FORUM - remove this ^, please. Bring Reliable Sources for discussion ONLY. 2603:6080:2100:5674:9C82:D642:E678:EC5F (talk) 22:57, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Rightly... Would it hurt not to do so if there really isn't any real imminent possibility of his incoming administration doing that? 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 23:02, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
And moveover, it's clear at least one particular congressperson is dead serious. Dead as in DOA. Unless he likes that (which is very likely). But yea, it ain't renaming anytime soon if the namesake country has anything to say about it. Or some excellent "expert" on history in the great region. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 21:36, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
I believe the article would retain its current link, with perhaps the new name added in addendum and as a redirect. Until the change is made official, if it ever is, the article should remain as it is. 2601:541:101:D4D0:CC1E:1B05:87C5:48C7 (talk) 21:58, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Turns out there is already that redirect. And would rather remove it as unnecessary. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 22:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

References

  1. Chambers, Francesca (January 7, 2025). "Gulf of America? Trump says he'll change name of 'Gulf of Mexico'". USA TODAY. Retrieved January 7, 2025.

Semi-protected edit request on 8 January 2025

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Name change

On January 7th, 2025, United States president-elect Donald Trump announced during a fit of dementia that "pretty soon in the future" his administration will change the name of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America, stating that "we do most of the work there." 66.8.225.138 (talk) 03:22, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

 Not done: see to get consensus and this version lacks WP:NPOV. Skynxnex (talk) 04:43, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
I feel like a small section should be dedicated to this, maybe a section on the origin of its name could be included. Trump seemed serious during his remark and MTG already stated she would be willing to draft the bill. Although I also think that the phrase "during a fit of dementia" should be omitted as it is too politically charged and a baseless claim. 2600:1700:CD8:5740:34E5:BB1E:C46E:FF59 (talk) 03:45, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I think at this point it'd be, at the most, WP:DUE to include on perhaps Trump's article or Second presidential transition of Donald Trump and/or Taylor Greene's (although it looks like no one has even tried yet, probably for the best). But not here as a bit of verbage about renaming the Gulf doesn't really have any encyclopedic value about the Gulf itself. Maybe in a few weeks/months/years. Skynxnex (talk) 15:26, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I disagree, normally I would agree, however with the amount of influence Trump has, it is likely people will begin calling it "The gulf of America" regardless of the fact that no action has been taken to formally change the name yet, if 80 million Americans (which is a pretty conservative guess) start referring to the gulf of Mexico as the gulf of America, that is worth putting in this article to let people know, that way they don't get confused when someone refers to it as this. I've already heard people refer it as such. Juju376 (talk) 17:34, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
This is a modern version of the Freedom fries jingoism, having nothing to do with geography and everything to do with politics. We have the same sort of thing as a perennial complaint with British Isles from a series of Irish editors. This nothing new or special, and can be documented on its own and with simple passing mention in the article if and when it becomes more than a sound bite at a news conference. See British Isles naming dispute, Sea of Japan naming dispute, Persian Gulf naming dispute... Politicians do this sort of thing all the time. Acroterion (talk) 17:47, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

References

  1. https://www.forbes.com/sites/saradorn/2025/01/07/gulf-of-america-trump-says-hell-rename-gulf-of-mexico/
  2. https://apnews.com/article/trump-gulf-of-mexico-bc438f4feca1234475a1adef99344da7

Per WP:COMMONNAME the article name would not change even if on of the countries in the region unilaterally started using a different name. Even in the unlikely event that other countries started using the alternative name Misplaced Pages policy is clear that WP:OFFICIALNAMES should not be used just because they are official. 2A04:4A43:898F:FB21:9898:E0B7:34F8:59FE (talk) 07:37, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 8 January 2025

This is minor, but in the history section there is the following sentence. "As early as the Maya civilization, the Gulf of Mexico was used as a trade route off the coast of the Yucatán Peninsula and present-day Veracruz." "Trade route" links to the page "Trade in the Maya civilization". However, there is a far more relevant article "Maritime trade in the Maya civilization", and the general "Trade in the Maya Civilization" hardly discusses Mayan use of the Gulf of Mexico for maritime trade at all. I suggest changing that link to the more relevant article accordingly. I also suggest fleshing out that section a little bit more maybe. In fact the whole history section should probably expand beyond Spanish exploration. 2601:801:300:8230:F901:E2B4:E056:5A72 (talk) 08:25, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Partly  Done. I made the suggested change in the link. The last part of the request is too vague for action here. If you desire, you can make more specific requests, supported by references to reliable sources as needed. Otherwise, further editing will be dependent on editors with the interest, time, and access to appropriate sources. We will hopefully be able to lift the editing restrictions on this article in a short while, and you will then be able to help improve the article yourself. Donald Albury 14:51, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

"Gulf of America" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Gulf of America has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 8 § Gulf of America until a consensus is reached. Drmies (talk) 14:55, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Gulf of America comment

Should Trump’s proposal to rename the Gulf of Mexico be mentioned somewhere? Hurricane Clyde 🌀 03:34, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Support - yes I believe it should believe it should be mentioned, as it has become a large topic of discussion globally relating to the the gulf, I believe a subcategory called “Trump name change proposal” would be appropriate and in that briefly summarise what he said in the press conference and following, the Mexican presidents reaction and wider international and national reaction, it could also be prudent to mention that there is debate whether the President of the United States has the authority to rename the gulf as many news outlets have been covering that aspect to it in the wake of the press conference @Hurricane Clyde Knowledgework69 (talk) 06:52, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Please note that the above is a question and not an RfC, and bolded supports or opposes are premature. As has been noted above, the question of where and when the renaming proposal should be mentioned in any Misplaced Pages article needs further discussion. Donald Albury 15:44, 10 January 2025 (UTC) Edited. 15:46, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
My apologies, but it should now be added, as of 9 January 2025 MAGA Republicans in the United States Congress, have introduced a bill to rename the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America (Spearheaded by Rep Marjorie Taylor Greene) supporting President Elect Trumps proposal to rename the Gulf: The Hill, The Well News, Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene Press Release
As previously mentioned Trumps proposal has drawn international coverage and has been responded to by the Mexican President
@Donald Albury@Hurricane Clyde Knowledgework69 (talk) 18:47, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Here are links to H.R.276 of the 119th Congress introduced by Congresswoman Greene of the State of Georgia, Co-Sponsored by 14 other congressional members congress.gov Gulf of America Act (Pre introduction as H.R.276) Knowledgework69 (talk) 18:54, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
I’ll second that by saying that the AP has also mentioned it too. There are certainly reliable sources. Hurricane Clyde 🌀 19:23, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
USA Today has also mentioned it as well. Hurricane Clyde 🌀 19:23, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
I would say if it touches anything with the current Congress or the United States Board on Geographic Names. – The Grid (talk) 21:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Direct link to H.R. 276, but the proposed language won't appear until next week. – The Grid (talk) 21:34, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
In my opinion @The Grid, regardless of whether or not Congress actually takes up the issue; I think just the reaction internationally is notable enough for at least a mention somewhere; whether here, or on one of the Donald Trump articles, or both. Hurricane Clyde 🌀 21:53, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
I agree that it has reached the threshold for notability, I think the most appropriate would be to add mention to the name change proposal in this article and the second trump presidency article Knowledgework69 (talk) 13:02, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Yes. I was surprised to see this is not mentioned. ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:34, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Renamed to Gulf of America

WP:SNOW. Unless it actually happens (and there's been nothing serious on this since that comment made days ago), no, it will not be renamed here; nor shall his name for the Gulf be mentioned. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 12:43, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This body of water was renamed "Gulf of America" effective January 20, 2025. Trinitydeclaration (talk) 04:47, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

No it wasn’t @Trinitydeclaration. Just because they’re proposing legislation doesn’t mean that it’ll be renamed. Hurricane Clyde 🌀 06:10, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Moreover, per the policy at Misplaced Pages:Article titles#Use commonly recognizable names, we use the common name of a place. Even if the United States Government uses a different name, it is not the only country bordering on the Gulf of Mexico, and I think it unlikely that most reliable sources will stop calling it the Gulf of Mexico. And remember, this is the English language Misplaced Pages, not the United States Misplaced Pages. Donald Albury 15:37, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
And you’re exactly right @Donald Albury. COMMONNAME would still apply. Hurricane Clyde 🌀 21:44, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Per WP:COMMONNAME the article name would not change even if on of the countries in the region unilaterally started using a different name. Even in the unlikely event that other countries started using the alternative name Misplaced Pages policy is clear that WP:OFFICIALNAMES should not be used just because they are official. 2A04:4A43:898F:FB21:F1BC:A7CA:D59E:5632 (talk) 21:27, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Exactly IP, a perfect example is Rio Grande, we don’t call it Río Bravo. Hurricane Clyde 🌀 17:38, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
As an aside, consider the history of Cape Kennedy, in which a president changed the name of a prominent geographical feature by proclamation. The change endured a little less than ten years, and is now barely mentioned in Misplaced Pages. Donald Albury 18:13, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

History section needs some work

The final portion of the "History" section about d'Iberville's 1697 expedition needs to be cleaned up. As it is written it makes very little sense. There is a paragraph long run-on sentence which never manages to conclude a thought. 2600:1700:D40:1D80:EA26:FF67:5B4D:8B3 (talk) 01:04, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Executive order renaming to gulf of America

Will be signed today, as per CNN reporting. 99.227.156.90 (talk) 15:10, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

The US is only one of the 88 countries and territories in which English is an official, administrative, or cultural language. If the adoption of the new name becomes widespread among English speakers, then yes, otherwise it should remain as Gulf of Mexico. No offense, but Misplaced Pages is not the American government. See WP:COMMONAME. Accuratelibrarian (talk) 15:37, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Sure, but the information is relevant in the article. There are multiple sources discussing already. USA Today, The Independent, US New and World Report. Valereee (talk) 15:46, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Some alternatives, once the executive order has been signed, are "also called" in the lead sentence, an explanatory footnote, or a "Name" section. Any other suggestions? Donald Albury 16:19, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
I think something like (if he does actually do it), "Donald Trump made an attempt by executive order to change the name to 'Gulf of America' on (date)" with reaction from Mexico etc. would probably be good enough for now. We can note later when the US official maps get changed, wait to see how many other countries change their official maps. Valereee (talk) 16:39, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Once (and if) it happens, I do think we will need to discuss how prominent in the article this should be. I would like it to be a section or a footnote, but I expect to see supporters for putting it in the lead. Donald Albury 16:51, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Oh, and again, I would like to point interested readers to the history of Cape Kennedy. Donald Albury 16:52, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
The best analogue is probably Sea of Japan where there is a dominant English-language name for a body of water in which the two countries claiming that it should be named after itself. There, it has a name section, and a link to the section from the top. -- Patar knight - /contributions 17:14, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Stand by for an incoming spate of vandalism... Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:32, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Categories:
Talk:Gulf of Mexico: Difference between revisions Add topic